Responsive Systems Comparison Method: Case Study in Assessing Future Designs in the Presence of Change

In this short paper, the Responsive Systems Comparison (RSC) method is introduced. RSC is a structured method for collecting information and conducting analysis to characterize a wide variety of possible futures in order to enable the comparison of the performance of proposed systems in those futures. A case study uses the RSC to analyze a satellite radar system. The needs and expectations of a user community for such a system, the context it will operate in, and its technical basis are determined both at the present time, and with possible changes over the next 15 years. This information is used to set up an analysis that should be able to highlight systems that will deliver value under a wide variety of future situations. The case study illustrates the practicality of the method, and provides lessons for improvement and implementation.

[1]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  A Framework for Incorporating "ilities" in Tradespace Studies , 2007 .

[2]  Adam Michael Ross,et al.  Managing unarticulated value : changeability in multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2006 .

[3]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Scenario planning in dynamic multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2009, 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[4]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[5]  Maurice Martin,et al.  TechSat 21 and Revolutionizing Space Missions using Microsatellites , 2001 .

[6]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Anticipatory capacity: Leveraging model-based approaches to design systems for dynamic futures , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Model-Based Systems Engineering.

[7]  Hugh McManus,et al.  A framework for understanding uncertainty and its mitigation and exploitation in complex systems , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS: ENGINEERING PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT , 1990 .

[9]  Daniel P. Thunnissen,et al.  Uncertainty Classification for the Design and Development of Complex Systems , 2003 .

[10]  D.H. Rhodes,et al.  Architecting Systems for Value Robustness: Research Motivations and Progress , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[11]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm , 2005 .

[12]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  A Practical Method for Tradespace Exploration of Systems of Systems , 2009 .

[13]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[14]  M.E. Davis,et al.  Space based radar technology challenges , 2005, 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference.