Texture‐etched ZnO as a versatile base for optical back reflectors with well‐designed surface morphologies for application in thin film solar cells

ZnO layers with a wide range of surface morphologies were studied for applications in thin film silicon solar cells. The texture of ZnO layers, achieved by chemical etching, was measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and statistically analyzed in terms of the roughness, the crater depth, the crater diameter, and the crater opening angle. We present a method to independently tune the lateral and vertical dimensions of the etched crater structures by combined variations of ZnO layer thickness and etching time. The optical scattering properties of the textured ZnO layers are investigated. The effects of these morphologies on the performance of the solar cells, prepared in both p–i–n and n–i–p configurations are analyzed. For the latter cell type the roughness is introduced at the back side, thus the cell does not sense ZnO absorption and conductivity of the different morphologies. The link between the morphology, the optical properties of ZnO layers, and the solar cell performance is discussed.

[1]  V. Smirnov,et al.  Window layer development for microcrystalline silicon solar cells in n-i-p configuration , 2010 .

[2]  J. Müller,et al.  Modified Thornton model for magnetron sputtered zinc oxide: film structure and etching behaviour , 2003 .

[3]  Helmut Stiebig,et al.  Thin-film silicon solar cells with efficient periodic light trapping texture , 2007 .

[4]  M. Schulte,et al.  Modeling of light scattering properties from surface profile in thin-film solar cells by Fourier transform techniques , 2011 .

[5]  H. E. Bennett,et al.  Relation between Surface Roughness and Specular Reflectance at Normal Incidence , 1961 .

[6]  M. Ferenets,et al.  Thin Solid Films , 2010 .

[7]  J. Springer,et al.  Light trapping and optical losses in microcrystalline silicon pin solar cells deposited on surface-textured glass/ZnO substrates , 2004 .

[8]  M. Zeman,et al.  Optical modeling of a-Si:H solar cells with rough interfaces: Effect of back contact and interface roughness , 2000 .

[9]  M. Zeman,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of ZnO:Al films on light scattering in hydrogenated amorphous silicon solar cells , 2003 .

[10]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[11]  V. Terrazzoni-Daudrix,et al.  Optimization of amorphous silicon thin film solar cells for flexible photovoltaics , 2008 .

[12]  Karsten Bittkau,et al.  Ray tracing for the optics at nano‐textured ZnO–air and ZnO–silicon interfaces , 2011 .

[13]  J. Hüpkes,et al.  Chemical Etching of Zinc Oxide for Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells , 2011, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[14]  Michio Kondo,et al.  Effect of self-orderly textured back reflectors on light trapping in thin-film microcrystalline silicon solar cells , 2009 .

[15]  Hiroaki Okamoto,et al.  Influence of substrate texture on microstructure and photovoltaic performances of thin film polycrystalline silicon solar cells , 2002 .

[16]  S. Guha,et al.  Triple-junction amorphous silicon alloy solar cell with 14.6% initial and 13.0% stable conversion efficiencies , 1997 .