Polymerization and shrinkage stress formation of experimental resin composites doped with nano- vs. micron-sized bioactive glasses.

This study investigated the effect of adding bioactive glass 45S5 (BG) of different particle sizes to dental composite on resin polymerization and shrinkage stress formation. Commercial flowable composite was mixed with either 15 wt% BG fillers (nanometric, micrometric, or hybrid BG) or inert barium glass. Real-time linear polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress were recorded, and the degree of conversion was measured using FTIR spectroscopy. The commercial (unmodified) composite developed significantly higher linear shrinkage and shrinkage stress than the groups with 15 wt% added inert or BG fillers. After adding inert barium glass, the composite showed significantly higher linear shrinkage than when micrometric BG was added. The addition of bioactive or inert glass fillers did not affect the degree of conversion. Shrinkage stress can be reduced by adding inert or bioactive fillers (nano- and/or microparticulate BG) without affecting monomer conversion.

[1]  R. Hickel,et al.  Polymerization kinetics of experimental bioactive composites containing bioactive glass. , 2018, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  T. Attin,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force kinetics of high- and low-viscosity dimethacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk-fill resin composites , 2018, Odontology.

[3]  P. Usai,et al.  The role of adhesive materials and oral biofilm in the failure of adhesive resin restorations. , 2017, American journal of dentistry.

[4]  T. Attin,et al.  Genotoxic potential of dental bulk-fill resin composites. , 2017, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  W. Stark,et al.  Bioactive glass containing silicone composites for left ventricular assist device drivelines: role of Bioglass 45S5® particle size on mechanical properties and cytocompatibility , 2017, Journal of Materials Science.

[6]  T. Attin,et al.  Enamel wear by antagonistic restorative materials under erosive conditions , 2017, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[7]  W. Stark,et al.  Incorporation of particulate bioactive glasses into a dental root canal sealer , 2016 .

[8]  J. Kruzic,et al.  Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  T. Attin,et al.  Pre-heating of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: effects on shrinkage force and monomer conversion. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  T. Attin,et al.  Monomer conversion and shrinkage force kinetics of low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites , 2015, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[11]  In-Nam Hwang,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites and highly filled flowable resin. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[12]  T. Attin,et al.  Functionalizing a dentin bonding resin to become bioactive. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  T. Attin,et al.  Effect of modulated photo-activation on polymerization shrinkage behavior of dental restorative resin composites. , 2014, European journal of oral sciences.

[14]  M. Zehnder,et al.  Shrinkage of backfill gutta-percha upon cooling , 2014, BDJ.

[15]  J. Kruzic,et al.  Mechanical performance of novel bioactive glass containing dental restorative composites. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  T. Attin,et al.  Durability of the anti-erosive effect of surfaces sealants under erosive abrasive conditions , 2013, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[17]  T. Attin,et al.  The effects of internal tooth bleaching regimens on composite-to-composite bond strength. , 2012, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[18]  Terry Yuan-Fang Chen,et al.  Contraction behaviors of dental composite restorations--finite element investigation with DIC validation. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[19]  Antheunis Versluis,et al.  Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques. , 2011, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[20]  T. Attin,et al.  Influence of the interaction of light- and self-polymerization on subsurface hardening of a dual-cured core build-up resin composite , 2011, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[21]  Y. Kawano,et al.  Contraction stress related to composite inorganic content. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[23]  R. Moraes,et al.  Impact of immediate and delayed light activation on self-polymerization of dual-cured dental resin luting agents. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  F. Paqué,et al.  Fine-tuning of Bioactive Glass for Root Canal Disinfection , 2009, Journal of dental research.

[25]  J. Ferracane,et al.  How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  W. Stark,et al.  Do bioactive glasses convey a disinfecting mechanism beyond a mere increase in pH? , 2008, International endodontic journal.

[27]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Contraction stress and physical properties development of a resin-based composite irradiated using modulated curing methods at two C-factor levels. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[28]  V. Jain,et al.  Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations. , 2008, Operative dentistry.

[29]  Robert N Grass,et al.  Remineralization of human dentin using ultrafine bioactive glass particles. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  D. Zero,et al.  A New in vitro Model to Study the Relationship of Gap Size and Secondary Caries , 2007, Caries Research.

[31]  W J Stark,et al.  Antimicrobial Effect of Nanometric Bioactive Glass 45S5 , 2007, Journal of dental research.

[32]  B. Leroux,et al.  Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[33]  F. Trachtenberg,et al.  The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[34]  W. Stark,et al.  Glass and bioglass nanopowders by flame synthesis. , 2006, Chemical communications.

[35]  Albert J Feilzer,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[36]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[37]  R. Hickel,et al.  Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.

[38]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. , 2004, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[39]  W. Johnston,et al.  Linear displacement and force induced by polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[40]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[41]  Michael T. Wilson,et al.  Antibacterial activity of particulate bioglass against supra- and subgingival bacteria. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[42]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Soft-start polymerization and marginal gap formation in vitro. , 2001, American journal of dentistry.

[43]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[44]  J. Ferracane,et al.  The Effects of Adhesive Thickness on Polymerization Contraction Stress of Composite , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[45]  J E Moorhead,et al.  Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice , 2000, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[46]  K. Hiller,et al.  Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". , 2000, Operative dentistry.

[47]  R. Lakes,et al.  Interferometric Measurements of Cusp Deformation of Teeth Restored with Composites , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[48]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[49]  V. Qvist.  Correlation between marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations and bacterial growth in cavities. , 1980, Scandinavian journal of dental research.