Empirical formulation and parameterization of cation–π interactions for protein modeling

Cation–π interaction is comparable and as important as other main molecular interaction types, such as hydrogen bond, electrostatic interaction, van der Waals interaction, and hydrophobic interaction. Cation–π interactions frequently occur in protein structures, because six (Phe, Tyr, Trp, Arg, Lys, and His) of 20 natural amino acids and all metallic cations could be involved in cation–π interaction. Cation–π interactions arise from complex physicochemical nature and possess unique interaction behaviors, which cannot be modeled and evaluated by existing empirical equations and force field parameters that are widely used in the molecular dynamics. In this study, the authors present an empirical approach for cation–π interaction energy calculations in protein interactions. The accurate cation–π interaction energies of aromatic amino acids (Phe, Tyr, and Try) with protonated amino acids (Arg and Lys) and metallic cations (Li+, Na+, K+, and Ca2+) are calculated using B3LYP/6‐311+G(d,p) method as the benchmark for the empirical formulization and parameterization. Then, the empirical equations are built and the parameters are optimized based on the benchmark calculations. The cation–π interactions are distance and orientation dependent. Correspondingly, the empirical equations of cation–π interactions are functions of two variables, the distance r and the orientation angle θ. Two types of empirical equations of cation–π interactions are proposed. One is a modified distance and orientation dependent Lennard–Jones equation. The second is a polynomial function of two variables r and θ. The amino acid‐based empirical equations and parameters provide simple and useful tools for evaluations of cation–π interaction energies in protein interactions. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem , 2011

[1]  Marianne Rooman,et al.  Cation-pi/H-bond stair motifs at protein-DNA interfaces. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  K. Burke,et al.  Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations , 1996 .

[3]  K. Dunbar,et al.  Anion-pi interactions. , 2008, Chemical Society reviews.

[4]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  A polarizable model of water for molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2006 .

[5]  Kwang Soo Kim,et al.  Molecular Clusters of pi-Systems: Theoretical Studies of Structures, Spectra, and Origin of Interaction Energies. , 2000, Chemical reviews.

[6]  C. Strader,et al.  Amino–aromatic interaction between histidine 197 of the neurokinin-1 receptor and CP 96345 , 1993, Nature.

[7]  Adel Golovin,et al.  Cation–π interactions in protein–protein interfaces , 2005 .

[8]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  Cation-π interactions in structural biology , 1999 .

[9]  M. Rooman,et al.  Contribution of cation-pi interactions to the stability of protein-DNA complexes. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Kenneth D. Jordan,et al.  Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer , 1994 .

[11]  D. Brenner,et al.  Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. , 1990, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[12]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[13]  G A Petsko,et al.  Amino‐aromatic interactions in proteins , 1986, FEBS letters.

[14]  Y. Kai,et al.  Novel cation‐π interaction revealed by crystal structure of thermoalkalophilic lipase , 2007, Proteins.

[15]  A. Warshel,et al.  What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.

[16]  J. Thornton,et al.  Amino/aromatic interactions in proteins: is the evidence stacked against hydrogen bonding? , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  R. Bartlett,et al.  A full coupled‐cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triples , 1982 .

[18]  J. Ponder,et al.  Force fields for protein simulations. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.

[19]  A. Becke A New Mixing of Hartree-Fock and Local Density-Functional Theories , 1993 .

[20]  M. Levitt,et al.  Aromatic Rings Act as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors , 2022 .

[21]  Da-qi Wang,et al.  Dinickel(II) Complexes of Bis(N-heterocyclic carbene) Ligands Containing [Ni2(μ-OH)] Cores as Highly Efficient Catalysts for the Coupling of Aryl Chlorides , 2008 .

[22]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  Cation−π Interactions in Proteins: Can Simple Models Provide an Accurate Description? , 1999 .

[23]  Julia E. Rice,et al.  An efficient closed-shell singles and doubles coupled-cluster method , 1988 .

[24]  N S Scrutton,et al.  Cation-pi bonding and amino-aromatic interactions in the biomolecular recognition of substituted ammonium ligands. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[25]  H. Lester,et al.  A Cation-π Interaction in the Binding Site of the Glycine Receptor Is Mediated by a Phenylalanine Residue , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Leckband,et al.  Intermolecular forces in biology , 2001, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[27]  G. Scuseria,et al.  Is coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) more computationally intensive than quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD) , 1989 .

[28]  D. Dougherty Cation-pi interactions involving aromatic amino acids. , 2007, The Journal of nutrition.

[29]  Keehyoung Joo,et al.  Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side‐chain accuracy in homology modeling: Four approaches that performed well in CASP8 , 2009, Proteins.

[30]  Marianne Rooman,et al.  Free-energy calculations of protein-ligand cation-pi and amino-pi interactions: from vacuum to proteinlike environments. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  Mark E. Tuckerman,et al.  Molecular dynamics algorithm for multiple time scales: Systems with long range forces , 1991 .

[32]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  The Cationminus signpi Interaction. , 1997, Chemical reviews.

[33]  Max F. Perutz,et al.  Hemoglobin as a receptor of drugs and peptides: x-ray studies of the stereochemistry of binding , 1986 .

[34]  F. Diederich,et al.  Interactions with aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[35]  S L Mowbray,et al.  Planar stacking interactions of arginine and aromatic side-chains in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Modeling electrostatic effects in proteins. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[37]  Christoph Janiak,et al.  A critical account on π–π stacking in metal complexes with aromatic nitrogen-containing ligands , 2000 .

[38]  J. Glover,et al.  Recognition of 5'-YpG-3' sequences by coupled stacking/hydrogen bonding interactions with amino acid residues. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II Protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[40]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  Cation-π Interactions in Chemistry and Biology: A New View of Benzene, Phe, Tyr, and Trp , 1996, Science.

[41]  Curtis L. Janssen,et al.  An efficient reformulation of the closed‐shell coupled cluster single and double excitation (CCSD) equations , 1988 .

[42]  M. Levitt,et al.  Computer simulation of protein folding , 1975, Nature.