Carcinogenic Risk Assessment in the United States and Great Britain: The Case of Aldrin/Dieldrin
暂无分享,去创建一个
R. Johnston | B Gillespie | D Eva | R Johnston | B. Gillespie | D. Eva
[1] T. Maugh. Chemical carcinogens: the scientific basis for regulation. , 1978, Science.
[2] Ron Johnston,et al. The Development of Specialties in Industrialised Science , 1977 .
[3] R. Rettig. Cancer Crusade: The Story of the National Cancer Act of 1971 , 1977 .
[4] U. Saffiotti. Editorial: Comments on the scientific basis for the "Delaney Clause". , 1973, Preventive medicine.
[5] Weaver Ph. Regulation, social policy, and class conflict. , 1978 .
[6] John B. Shoven,et al. I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.
[7] J. Davies. The Politics of Pollution , 1975 .
[8] D. E. Stevenson,et al. The toxicology of dieldrin (HEOD). I. Long-term oral toxicity studies in mice. , 1973, Food and cosmetics toxicology.
[9] J. M. Barnes,et al. Carcinogenic hazards from pesticide residues. , 1966, Residue reviews.
[10] O. Fitzhugh,et al. Tumorigenic potential of aldrin and dieldrin for mice. , 1962, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.
[11] R. Johnston,et al. The Role of Cognitive and Occupational Differentiation in Scientific Controversies , 1976 .
[12] H. Nowotny. SCIENTIFIC PURITY AND NUCLEAR DANGER The Case of Risk-Assessment , 1977 .
[13] Stuart S. Blume. Toward a political sociology of science , 1974 .
[14] P. Weaver. Regulation, social policy, and class conflict. , 1978, The Public interest.
[15] A. Rip,et al. Science Policy Advisory Councils in France, The Netherlands and the United States, 1957-77 , 1979, Social studies of science.