Small Landers and Separable Sub-Spacecraft for Near-term Solar Sails

Following the successful PHILAE landing with ESA's ROSETTA probe and the launch of the MINERVA rovers and the Mobile Asteroid Surface Scout, MASCOT, aboard the JAXA space probe, HAYABUSA2, to asteroid (162173) Ryugu, small landers have found increasing interest. Integrated at the instrument level in their mothership they support small solar system body studies. With efficient capabilities, resource-friendly design and inherent robustness they are an attractive exploration mission element. We discuss advantages and constraints of small sub-spacecraft, focusing on emerging areas of activity such as asteroid diversity studies, planetary defence, and asteroid mining, on the background of our projects PHILAE, MASCOT, MASCOT2, the JAXA-DLR Solar Power Sail Lander Design Study, and others. The GOSSAMER-1 solar sail deployment concept also involves independent separable sub-spacecraft operating synchronized to deploy the sail. Small spacecraft require big changes in the way we do things and occasionally a little more effort than would be anticipated based on a traditional large spacecraft approach. In a Constraints-Driven Engineering environment we apply Concurrent Design and Engineering (CD/CE), Concurrent Assembly, Integration and Verification (CAIV) and Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). Near-term solar sails will likely be small spacecraft which we expect to harmonize well with nano-scale separable instrument payload packages.

[1]  Mark B. Boslough,et al.  Low-altitude airbursts and the impact threat. , 2007 .

[2]  Peter Lebedew,et al.  Untersuchungen über die Druckkräfte des Lichtes , 1901 .

[3]  Hartmut Müller,et al.  A space-based mission to characterize the IEO population , 2013 .

[4]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Gossamer Roadmap Technology Reference Study for a Solar Polar Mission , 2014 .

[5]  Christian Grimm,et al.  Going Beyond the Possible, Going Beyond the “Standard” of Spacecraft Integration and Testing! , 2015 .

[6]  Bernd Dachwald,et al.  Gossamer Roadmap Technology Reference Study for a Multiple NEO Rendezvous Mission , 2014 .

[7]  Mark B. Boslough Impact decision support diagrams , 2014 .

[8]  Stephan Ulamec,et al.  Spacecraft for Hypervelocity Impact Research – An Overview of Capabilities, Constraints and the Challenges of Getting There , 2015 .

[9]  H. Müller,et al.  Implementation of concurrent engineering to Phase B space system design , 2011 .

[10]  Peter S. Gural,et al.  Chelyabinsk Airburst, Damage Assessment, Meteorite Recovery, and Characterization , 2013, Science.

[11]  Karsten Scheibe,et al.  AsteroidFinder - a German Mission for the Search of IEOs , 2009 .

[12]  Hajime Yano,et al.  A Small Asteroid Lander Mission to Accompany Hayabusa-II , 2012 .

[13]  Michael Lange,et al.  MASCOT - Structures design and qualification of an "organic" mobile pander platform for low gravity bodies , 2014 .

[14]  Bong Wie,et al.  GPU-Based Optical Navigation and Terminal Guidance Simulation of a Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle ( HAIV ) , 2013 .

[15]  David A. Kring,et al.  Guidebook to the geology of Barringer Meteorite Crater, Arizona (a k a Meteor Crater) , 2007 .

[16]  Stephan Ulamec,et al.  One Shot to an Asteroid- MASCOT and the Design of an Exclusively Primary Battery Powered Small Spacecraft in Hardware Design Examples and Operations Considerations , 2014 .

[17]  Luca Celotti,et al.  MASCOT thermal subsystem design challenges and solutionfor contrasting requirements , 2015 .

[18]  M. Ceriotti,et al.  Solar Sail Trajectory Design for a Multiple Near-Earth Asteroid Rendezvous Mission , 2016 .

[19]  S. P. Worden,et al.  The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth , 2002, Nature.

[20]  Martin E. Zander,et al.  Gossamer-1: Mission concept and technology for a controlled deployment of gossamer spacecraft , 2017 .

[21]  Akira Fujiwara,et al.  Hayabusa—Its technology and science accomplishment summary and Hayabusa-2 , 2006 .

[22]  Bernd Dachwald,et al.  Gossamer Roadmap Technology Reference Study for a Sub-L1 Space Weather Mission , 2014 .

[23]  Jan Thimo Grundmann,et al.  Verification Testing of the Gossamer-1 Deployment Demonstrator , 2016 .

[24]  Bernd Dachwald,et al.  Head-On Impact Deflection of NEAs: A Case Study for 99942 Apophis , 2007 .

[25]  Franz Lura,et al.  The 3-step DLR–ESA Gossamer road to solar sailing , 2011 .

[26]  M. Rayman The successful conclusion of the Deep Space 1 Mission: important results without a flashy title , 2002 .

[27]  Andy Braukhane,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE NEW CONCURRENT ENGINEERING FACILITY AT DLR , 2008 .

[28]  D. Plettemeier,et al.  Properties of the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko interior revealed by CONSERT radar , 2015, Science.

[29]  Mark B. Boslough Airburst warning and response , 2014 .

[30]  Carl Sagan,et al.  Dangers of asteroid deflection , 1994, Nature.

[31]  Jens Biele,et al.  Philae (Rosetta Lander): Experiment status after commissioning , 2006 .

[32]  Michael Lange,et al.  MASCOT—The Mobile Asteroid Surface Scout Onboard the Hayabusa2 Mission , 2017 .

[33]  Stephan Ulamec,et al.  MAGIC - Mobile Autonomous Generic Insstrument Carrier for the in-situ investigation of NEO surfaces and interior , 2011 .

[34]  Vincent Hamm,et al.  Calibration of MicrOmega Hayabusa-2 Flight Model — First Results , 2016 .

[35]  Michael Lange,et al.  MASCOT- A Lightweight Multi-Purpose Lander Platform , 2012 .

[36]  Jens Biele,et al.  Rosetta Lander - Landing and operations on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2016 .

[37]  Wolfgang Seboldt,et al.  Ground-Based Demonstration of Solar Sail Technology , 2000 .

[38]  Christian Grimm,et al.  DLR MASCOT on HAYABUSA-II, A Mission That May Change Your Idea of Life: AIV Challenges in a Fast Paced and High Performance Deep Space Project , 2013 .

[39]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  The Rosetta Mission: Flying Towards the Origin of the Solar System , 2007 .

[40]  David H. Lehman,et al.  Results from the Deep Space 1 technology validation mission , 2000 .

[41]  Michael,et al.  Rosetta Lander - after seven years of cruise, prepared for hibernation , 2012 .

[42]  S. Dlr Koeln Ulamec,et al.  RoLand, a Lander System for an Active Comet , 1995 .

[43]  Jeffrey Hendrikse,et al.  Concurrent AIV and Dynamic Model Strategy in Response to the New Normal of so called Death March Projects: The Engineering Venture as Experienced in the DLR MASCOT and Hayabusa-2 Project , 2014 .

[44]  J. Knollenberg,et al.  The MASCOT Radiometer MARA for the Hayabusa 2 Mission , 2013 .

[45]  F. Scholten,et al.  The landing(s) of Philae and inferences about comet surface mechanical properties , 2015, Science.

[46]  J. Borovička,et al.  A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors , 2013, Nature.

[47]  Patric Seefeldt,et al.  Qualification Testing of the Gossamer-1 Deployment Technology , 2016 .

[48]  K. Wittmann,et al.  Handbook of Space Technology , 2009 .

[49]  Volodymyr Baturkin,et al.  Small satellites for big science: the challenges of high-density design in the DLR Kompaktsatellit AsteroidFinder/SSB , 2010 .

[50]  S. Ulamec,et al.  Relevance of PHILAE and MASCOT In-Situ Investigations for Planetary Defense , 2015 .

[51]  John L. Hubisz Rain of Iron and Ice: The Very Real Threat of Comet and Asteroid Bombardment, by John S. Lewis , 2000 .

[52]  N·克里桑多斯 Analysis of flight data , 2013 .

[53]  Jeffrey Hendrikse,et al.  TECHNOLOGY AND KNOWLEDGE REUSE CONCEPTS TO ENABLE RESPONSIVE NEO CHARACTERIZATION MISSIONS BASED ON THE MASCOT LANDER , 2015 .