Gender Matters: The Impact of Animated Agents on Students' Affect, Behavior and Learning

We report on the reactions of males and females to the presence of animated agents that provided emotional or motivational feedback. One hundred (100) high school students used agents embedded in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Mathematics and randomized controlled evaluations compared students with and without learning companions. Positive results indicate that affective pedagogical agents can improve affective outcomes of students in general and particularly so for female students, who reported being more frustrated and less confident while solving math problems prior to using the tutoring system. We discuss issues of incorporating gender into user models and of generating responses tailored to gender.

[1]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Emotions and Learning with AutoTutor , 2007, AIED.

[2]  Sophia Catsambis The Path to Math: Gender and Racial-Ethnic Differences in Mathematics Participation from Middle School to High School. , 1994 .

[3]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[4]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Emotion Sensors Go To School , 2009, AIED.

[5]  Martha Carr,et al.  Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use : Social and metacognitive influences , 1997 .

[6]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Evaluating a Probabilistic Model of Student Affect , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[7]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[8]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Affective learning companions: strategies for empathetic agents with real-time multimodal affective sensing to foster meta-cognitive and meta-affective approaches to learning, motivation, and perseverance , 2006 .

[9]  C. Beal Boys and Girls: The Development of Gender Roles , 1993 .

[10]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Sensors Model Student Self Concept in the Classroom , 2009, UMAP.

[11]  James C. Lester,et al.  Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[12]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Affective Gendered Learning Companions , 2009, AIED.

[13]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[14]  Sophia Catsambis,et al.  Gender Differences in Mathematics: The Gender Gap in Mathematics: Merely a Step Function? , 2004 .

[15]  L. Sax,et al.  Why Gender Matters: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know About the Emerging Science of Sex Differences , 2005 .

[16]  J. Eccles,et al.  Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. , 1993, Child development.

[17]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Toward an Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[18]  W PicardRosalind,et al.  Toward an Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor , 2007 .

[19]  I. Arroyo,et al.  Addressing Cognitive Differences and Gender During Problem Solving , 2006 .

[20]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Gender Differences in Young Children’s Mathematical Thinking , 1998 .

[21]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system" , 2004, CHI.

[22]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  Gender Differences in Mathematics , 2005 .

[23]  Janna Siegel Robertson,et al.  Is Attribution Training a Worthwhile Classroom Intervention For K–12 Students with Learning Difficulties? , 2000 .

[24]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Inferring learning and attitudes from a Bayesian Network of log file data , 2005, AIED.