Enhanced Quality of Life and Smart Living

Before an intelligent machine can be of help, it has to understand us. There is nothing more frustrating than negotiating with a machine that does not recognize our request, or that misunderstands our intent. Machine learning models and algorithms depend upon data analytics. Data analytics is biased toward dominant patterns, not outliers. People with disabilities and other minorities are outliers. Artificial intelligence has been heralded as a promising technology to assist individuals with disabilities. Intelligent machines have been envisioned as personal assistants, companions and smart environments to remind, prompt, guide, alert to risk and assist with daily functions. More urgently, intelligent machines are making a host of important decisions that affect our lives from predicting loan and credit worthiness, academic potential, terrorist intent, to future employment performance. Before the promise can be fully realized, and the prejudice averted, we must train our machines to be inclusive. This will benefit everyone. Intelligence that understands diversity and stretches to encompass the outliers is better at predicting risk and opportunity, more capable of processing the unexpected, more adaptable, and more dynamically resilient. Machine Learning for Image Processing in Healthcare

[1]  M Mokhtari,et al.  New Trends to Support Independence in Persons with Mild Dementia – A Mini-Review , 2012, Gerontology.

[2]  M P Lawton,et al.  Scales to measure competence in everyday activities. , 1988, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[3]  Polona Vilar Usability Engineering: Process, Products and Examples , 2010 .

[4]  Akira Ito,et al.  Artificial emotion expression for a robot by dynamic color change , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[5]  S. Katz,et al.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. , 1963, JAMA.

[6]  Aaron Marcus,et al.  Dare we define user-interface design? , 2002, INTR.

[7]  Simon A. Dobson,et al.  Situation identification techniques in pervasive computing: A review , 2012, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[8]  Klaus David,et al.  Improved activity recognition by using grouped activities , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[9]  Mukhtiar Memon,et al.  Ambient Assisted Living Healthcare Frameworks, Platforms, Standards, and Quality Attributes , 2014, Sensors.

[10]  Andrei Tolstikov,et al.  Activity Recognition in Assisted Living Facilities with Incremental, Approximate Ground Truth , 2015, ICOST.

[11]  Diane J. Cook,et al.  Learning Setting-Generalized Activity Models for Smart Spaces , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[12]  Pau-Choo Chung,et al.  A daily behavior enabled hidden Markov model for human behavior understanding , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Ayman Atia,et al.  An Experimental Comparison Between Seven Classification Algorithms for Activity Recognition , 2015, AISI.

[14]  Timo Jokela,et al.  Methods for quantitative usability requirements: a case study on the development of the user interface of a mobile phone , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[15]  Kenneth S. Hurst,et al.  Engineering Design Principles , 1999 .

[16]  Harry Budi Santoso,et al.  Measuring User Experience of the Student-Centered e-Learning Environment , 2016 .

[17]  Sylvain Giroux,et al.  Semantic Matching Framework for handicap situation detection in smart environments , 2009, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[18]  Holger Storf,et al.  An Approach to and Evaluations of Assisted Living Systems Using Ambient Intelligence for Emergency Monitoring and Prevention , 2009, HCI.

[19]  Raymond J. Mooney,et al.  Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[20]  Yasir Malik,et al.  Review of Challenges, Requirements, and Approaches of Pervasive Computing System Evaluation , 2012 .

[21]  V. Basili Software modeling and measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm , 1992 .

[22]  Yuval Shahar,et al.  The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines , 1998, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[23]  H T Waaler,et al.  Bayes' Theorem , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[24]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction , 2008 .

[25]  Blase Ur,et al.  Practical trigger-action programming in the smart home , 2014, CHI.

[26]  Martin Schrepp,et al.  Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire , 2008, USAB.

[27]  Timo Jokela,et al.  The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11 , 2003, CLIHC '03.

[28]  Gerda G. Fillenbaum,et al.  Multidimensional Functional Assessment of Older Adults: The Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures , 1988 .