An Unsupervised Classification Method for Hyperspectral Image Using Spectra Clustering

Matched filtering method is successfully used in classification for hyperspectral image. However, it is hard to extract the low reflectance ground object due to atmospheric influence. In this paper, an improved unsupervised classification method was introduced. It can extract the low reflectance object such as vegetation in shadowed region and water from the hyperspectral image effectively. Firstly, using pixel purity index (PPI) to find the endmembers from hyperspectral image and computing the spectral angle between the pixel spectrum and each endmember spectrum, the pixel was classified into the endmember class with the smallest spectral angle. Then, the endmember spectra were clustered using K-mean algorithm. Finally, classes were merged according to the K-mean algorithm result and the final classification result was projected and outputted. Comparing the result with the original image and the field data, they are consistent with each other. This method can produce the objective result without artificial interference.

[1]  Andreas T. Ernst,et al.  ICE: a statistical approach to identifying endmembers in hyperspectral images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  A F Goetz,et al.  Imaging Spectrometry for Earth Remote Sensing , 1985, Science.

[3]  J. Boardman,et al.  Mapping target signatures via partial unmixing of AVIRIS data: in Summaries , 1995 .

[4]  J. Boardman,et al.  Discrimination among semi-arid landscape endmembers using the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) algorithm , 1992 .

[5]  P. M. van Dijk,et al.  Spectral characterization of ophiolite lithologies in the Troodos Ophiolite complex of Cyprus and its potential in prospecting for massive sulphide deposits , 1997 .

[6]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .

[7]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[8]  Paul E. Lewis,et al.  FLAASH, a MODTRAN4-based atmospheric correction algorithm, its application and validation , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[9]  Robert O. Green,et al.  On-orbit radiometric and spectral calibration characteristics of EO-1 Hyperion derived with an underflight of AVIRIS and in situ measurements at Salar de Arizaro, Argentina , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Effects of Sample Size in Classifier Design , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  E. L. Hunter,et al.  An assessment of two classification methods for mapping Thames Estuary intertidal habitats using CASI data , 2002 .

[12]  J. Boardman Automating spectral unmixing of AVIRIS data using convex geometry concepts , 1993 .

[13]  Freek D. van der Meer,et al.  Indicator kriging applied to absorption band analysis in hyperspectral imagery: A case study from the Rodalquilar epithermal gold mining area, SE Spain , 2006 .

[14]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[15]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[16]  J W Schwarz,et al.  Adaptive Threshold for Spectral Matching of Hyperspectral Data , 2001 .

[17]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  Quantitative geochemical mapping of ammonium minerals in the southern Cedar Mountains, Nevada, using the airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS) , 1998 .

[18]  G. F. Hughes,et al.  On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  F. Meer The effectiveness of spectral similarity measures for the analysis of hyperspectral imagery , 2006 .