The Quantum Nature of Identity in Human Thought: Bose-Einstein Statistics for Conceptual Indistinguishability

Increasing experimental evidence shows that humans combine concepts in a way that violates the rules of classical logic and probability theory. On the other hand, mathematical models inspired by the formalism of quantum theory are in accordance with data on concepts and their combinations. In this paper, we investigate a new connection between concepts and quantum entities, namely the way both behave with respect to ‘identity’ and ‘indistinguishability’. We do this by considering conceptual entities of the type Eleven Animals, were a number is combined with a noun. In the combination Eleven Animals, indeed the ‘animals’ are identical and indistinguishable, and our investigation aims at identifying the nature of this conceptual identity and indistinguishability. We perform experiments on human subjects and find significant evidence of deviation from the predictions of classical statistical theories, more specifically deviations with respect to Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics. This deviation is of the ‘same type’ of the deviation of quantum mechanical from classical mechanical statistics, due to indistinguishability of microscopic quantum particles, i.e we find convincing evidence of the presence of Bose-Einstein statistics. We also present preliminary promising evidence of this phenomenon in a web-based study.

[1]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[2]  S. French,et al.  Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis , 2006 .

[3]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[4]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[5]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Entanglement in Concept Combinations , 2013, ArXiv.

[6]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Concepts and Their Dynamics: A Quantum-Theoretic Modeling of Human Thought , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[7]  D. Dürr,et al.  A survey of Bohmian mechanics , 1995 .

[8]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Quantum Models for Psychological Measurements: An Unsolved Problem , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Physics: A General Realistic and Operational Approach , 2001, quant-ph/0105109.

[10]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[11]  Sandro Sozzo,et al.  A Quantum Probability Explanation in Fock Space for Borderline Contradictions , 2013, 1311.6050.

[12]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Quantum-Like Tunnelling and Levels of Arbitrage , 2013 .

[13]  Elena Castellani Interpreting bodies : classical and quantum objects in modern physics , 1998 .

[14]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition: Why and How Concepts Are Entangled , 2011, QI.

[15]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[16]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A theory of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties , 2005 .

[17]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[18]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities: A Possible Explanatory Framework for Quantum Theory , 2009, 1004.2530.

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgments of and by Representativeness , 1981 .

[20]  J. Hampton Overextension of Conjunctive Concepts: Evidence for a Unitary Model of Concept Typicality and Class Inclusion , 1988 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty , 1992 .

[22]  J. Hampton,et al.  Disjunction of natural concepts , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[23]  J. Myrheim,et al.  On the theory of identical particles , 1977 .

[24]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  Identical Quantum Particles and Weak Discernibility , 2008 .

[25]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Identifying Quantum Structures in the Ellsberg Paradox , 2013, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[26]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  An Application of the Theory of Open Quantum Systems to Model the Dynamics of Party Governance in the US Political System , 2014 .

[27]  L. Infeld Quantum Theory of Fields , 1949, Nature.

[28]  Charles Wallis,et al.  Computation and cognition , 2003, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[29]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structure and human thought. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[30]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  The Potential of Quantum Probability for Modeling Cognitive Processes , 2011, CogSci.

[31]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[32]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Meaning-Focused and Quantum-Inspired Information Retrieval , 2013, QI.

[33]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations II: A Hilbert Space Representation , 2004 .