Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants.

In this chapter we examine the organisation of group behaviour at the level of the individual, and discuss the extent and significance of individual behavioural specialisation to group success. Studies of ants in which the behaviour of individuals as well as the group is recorded often reveal a high degree of individual specialisation in the absence of either age or morphological caste differences. Typically referred to as examples of elitism, idiosyncracy or specialisation, we incorporate these examples into a new classification, the key individual concept. This concept defines specialised individuals on the basis of their functional relationship to the behaviour of the group as a whole and indicates that a number of different organisational principles can underlie group behaviour. Some key individuals (catalysts) act to increase the activity level of other group members, whereas other key individuals (organisers) serve to ensure group cohesion and task completion. The demonstration that even large-scale process such as nest emigration can be organised by a subgroup of highly active individuals suggests that studies of group action might benefit from simultaneous analysis at both the individual and group level. Individuals may not always be behaviourally interchangeable, and individual behavioural specialisation, in the absence of age or caste differences, can be a significant component of group organisation.

[1]  Jörg Eder,et al.  Chemistry and biology of social insects. , 1987 .

[2]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Information Processing in Social Insects , 1999, Birkhäuser Basel.

[3]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Communication and orientation during foraging and emigration in the antFormica fusca , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[4]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[5]  D. Clayton,et al.  Socially Facilitated Behavior , 1978, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[6]  Ecologie des insectes sociaux , 1980 .

[7]  Shisan C. Chen The Leaders and Followers among the Ants in Nest-Building , 1937, Physiological Zoology.

[8]  C. Urbani Phytogeny and behavioural evolution in ants, with a discussion of the role of behaviour in evolutionary processes , 1989 .

[9]  G. Robinson Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[10]  S. Beshers,et al.  Maximization of foraging efficiency and resource defense by group retrieval in the ant Formica schaufussi , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  James F. A. Traniello,et al.  Trail and Territorial Communication in Social Insects , 1995 .

[12]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Role and variability of response thresholds in the regulation of division of labor in insect societies , 1999 .

[13]  D. Gordon The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[14]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[15]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective patterns and decision-making , 1989 .

[16]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Polyéthisme et Répartition des Niveaux d'Activité chez la Fourmi Lasius niger L. , 1983 .

[17]  Michael Möglich,et al.  Social Carrying Behavior and Division of Labor During Nest Moving in Ants , 1974 .

[18]  J. Herbers,et al.  Reliability theory and foraging by ants , 1981 .

[19]  Jeffrey W. Harris,et al.  Effects of stress, age, season, and source colony on levels of octopamine, dopamine and serotonin in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) brain , 1992 .

[20]  B. Cole,et al.  Mobile Cellular Automata Models of Ant Behavior: Movement Activity of Leptothorax allardycei , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[21]  R. Jeanne Evolution of Social Behavior in the Vespidae , 1980 .

[22]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Social responses to variation in food supply and nest suitability in ants (Tapinoma erraticum) , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  I. Karsai,et al.  Comb Building in Social Wasps: Self-organization and Stigmergic Script , 1993 .

[24]  X. Cerdá,et al.  A behavioural study of transporter workers in Cataglyphis iberica ant colonies (Hymenoptera Formicidae) , 1992 .

[25]  Jay E. Mittenthal,et al.  Response thresholds and division of labor in insect colonies. , 1999 .

[26]  W. M. Wheeler Ants; their structure, development and behavior, by William Morton Wheeler ... , 1910 .

[27]  J. Wenzel Behavioral Homology and Phylogeny , 1992 .

[28]  Social Modifications of Work Efficiency in Digging by the Ant, Formica (Formica) yessensis Forel (With 6 Text-figures and 1 Table) , 1982 .

[29]  W. M. Wheeler,et al.  Ants : their structure, development and behavior , 1960 .

[30]  S. Sakagami,et al.  Work efficiency in heterospecific ant groups composed of hosts and their labour parasites , 1962 .

[31]  E. Wilson,et al.  Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  From individual to collective behavior in social insects , 1987 .

[33]  The absence of social enhancement of digging in pairs of ants (formica lemani bondroit) , 1972 .

[34]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Self-organization in social insects. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Shisan C. Chen Social Modification of the Activity of Ants in Nest-Building , 1937, Physiological Zoology.

[36]  G. Robinson,et al.  Honeybee colony integration: worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Eto,et al.  effect of stress on levels of octopamine, dopamine and serotonin in the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana L.) , 1993 .