Impaired visual size-discrimination in children with movement disorders

Multisensory integration of spatial information occurs late in childhood, at around eight years (Gori, Del Viva, Sandini, & Burr, 2008). For younger children, the haptic system dominates size discrimination and vision dominates orientation discrimination: the dominance may reflect sensory calibration, and could have direct consequences on children born with specific sensory disabilities. Here we measure thresholds for visual discrimination of orientation and size in children with movement disorders of upper limbs. Visual orientation discrimination was very similar to the age-matched typical children, but visual size discrimination thresholds were far worse, in all eight individuals with early-onset movement disorder. This surprising and counterintuitive result is readily explained by the cross-sensory calibration hypothesis: when the haptic sense is unavailable for manipulation, it cannot be readily used to estimate size, and hence to calibrate the visual experience of size: visual discrimination is subsequently impaired. This complements a previous study showing that non-sighted children have reduced acuity for haptic orientation, but not haptic size, discriminations (Gori, Sandini, Martinoli, & Burr, 2010). Together these studies show that when either vision or haptic manipulation is impaired, the impairment also impacts on complementary sensory systems that are calibrated by that one.

[1]  C. S. Harris Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. , 1965, Psychological review.

[2]  M S Landy,et al.  Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Maria Concetta Morrone,et al.  Brain Development: Critical Periods for Cross-Sensory Plasticity , 2010, Current Biology.

[4]  Franco Lepore,et al.  Tactile acuity in the blind: A closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  G. Sandini,et al.  Poor Haptic Orientation Discrimination in Nonsighted Children May Reflect Disruption of Cross-Sensory Calibration , 2010, Current Biology.

[6]  G. Berkeley Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision , 2004 .

[7]  David C. Burr,et al.  Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information , 2008, Current Biology.

[8]  D. Henriques,et al.  Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  David R. Wozny,et al.  Recalibration of Auditory Space following Milliseconds of Cross-Modal Discrepancy , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[11]  M. Ernst,et al.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[12]  Albert Postma,et al.  The Influence of Visual Experience on Visual and Spatial Imagery , 2007, Perception.

[13]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[14]  H. Nakata,et al.  Indirect Tactual Discrimination of Heights by Blind and Blindfolded Sighted Subjects , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  G. Sandini,et al.  Direct and Indirect Haptic Calibration of Visual Size Judgments , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  D. Angelaki,et al.  Multisensory Calibration Is Independent of Cue Reliability , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Computational models of sensorimotor integration , 1997 .

[19]  J. Rauschecker Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  G. Cioni,et al.  Movement disorder-childhood rating scale: reliability and validity. , 2008, Pediatric neurology.

[21]  J. Saunders,et al.  Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? , 2003, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Landy,et al.  Ideal-Observer Models of Cue Integration , 2012 .

[23]  M. Landy,et al.  CHAPTER 1 Ideal-Observer Models of Cue Integration , 2011 .

[24]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[26]  D. Burr,et al.  Multisensory Integration Develops Late in Humans , 2012 .

[27]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Combining Priors and Noisy Visual Cues in a Rapid Pointing Task , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[29]  M. Paré,et al.  Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects , 1998, Nature.

[30]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans , 1999, Nature.

[32]  D Regan,et al.  Orientation-tuned spatial filters for texture-defined form , 1998, Vision Research.

[33]  Melvyn A Goodale,et al.  Motor Force Field Learning Influences Visual Processing of Target Motion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  C Muchnik,et al.  Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. , 1991, Scandinavian audiology.

[35]  Fiona N. Newell,et al.  The role of visual experience on the representation and updating of novel haptic scenes , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Sensitive Period for a Multimodal Response in Human Visual Motion Area MT/MST , 2010, Current Biology.

[37]  A. Kappers,et al.  Haptic orientation perception benefits from visual experience: Evidence from early-blind, late-blind, and sighted people , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Ione Fine,et al.  Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.