Whole-Slide Imaging and Automated Image Analysis

Digital pathology, the practice of pathology using digitized images of pathologic specimens, has been transformed in recent years by the development of whole-slide imaging systems, which allow for the evaluation and interpretation of digital images of entire histologic sections. Applications of whole-slide imaging include rapid transmission of pathologic data for consultations and collaborations, standardization and distribution of pathologic materials for education, tissue specimen archiving, and image analysis of histologic specimens. Histologic image analysis allows for the acquisition of objective measurements of histomorphologic, histochemical, and immunohistochemical properties of tissue sections, increasing both the quantity and quality of data obtained from histologic assessments. Currently, numerous histologic image analysis software solutions are commercially available. Choosing the appropriate solution is dependent on considerations of the investigative question, computer programming and image analysis expertise, and cost. However, all studies using histologic image analysis require careful consideration of preanalytical variables, such as tissue collection, fixation, and processing, and experimental design, including sample selection, controls, reference standards, and the variables being measured. The fields of digital pathology and histologic image analysis are continuing to evolve, and their potential impact on pathology is still growing. These methodologies will increasingly transform the practice of pathology, allowing it to mature toward a quantitative science. However, this maturation requires pathologists to be at the forefront of the process, ensuring their appropriate application and the validity of their results. Therefore, histologic image analysis and the field of pathology should co-evolve, creating a symbiotic relationship that results in high-quality reproducible, objective data.

[1]  Shaimaa Al-Janabi,et al.  Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives , 2012, Histopathology.

[2]  Steven J Potts,et al.  The role and impact of quantitative discovery pathology. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[3]  Laoighse Mulrane,et al.  Automated image analysis in histopathology: a valuable tool in medical diagnostics , 2008, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[4]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Telepathology for Intraoperative Neuropathologic Consultations at an Academic Medical Center: A 5-Year Report , 2007, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[5]  Paul J Tadrous,et al.  On the concept of objectivity in digital image analysis in pathology , 2010, Pathology.

[6]  T. Monticello,et al.  Modern Imaging Technologies in Toxicologic Pathology: An Overview , 2006, Toxicologic pathology.

[7]  Susan L Makris,et al.  Continuing Education Course #3 , 2011, Toxicologic pathology.

[8]  Paul Fontelo,et al.  Digital Pathology – Implementation Challenges in Low-Resource Countries , 2012, Analytical cellular pathology.

[9]  A. Jara-Lazaro,et al.  Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice , 2010, Pathology.

[10]  Mathias Uhlén,et al.  Tumour-specific HMG-CoAR is an independent predictor of recurrence free survival in epithelial ovarian cancer , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[11]  R. M. Simpson,et al.  Quantifying histological features of cancer biospecimens for biobanking quality assurance using automated morphometric pattern recognition image analysis algorithms. , 2011, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[12]  R. Dunstan,et al.  The Use of Immunohistochemistry for Biomarker Assessment—Can It Compete with Other Technologies? , 2011, Toxicologic pathology.

[13]  Rafael Jimenez,et al.  Use and validation of epithelial recognition and fields of view algorithms on virtual slides to guide TMA construction. , 2009, BioTechniques.

[14]  Aliyah R. Sohani,et al.  Static Digital Telepathology: A Model for Diagnostic and Educational Support to Pathologists in the Developing World , 2012, Analytical cellular pathology.

[15]  Béla Molnár,et al.  Validation of diagnostic accuracy using digital slides in routine histopathology , 2012, Diagnostic Pathology.

[16]  E. Weibel,et al.  American Thoracic Society Documents An Official Research Policy Statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: Standards for Quantitative Assessment of Lung Structure , 2010 .

[17]  Gloria Bueno,et al.  Review of imaging solutions for integrated quantitative immunohistochemistry in the Pathology daily practice. , 2010, Folia histochemica et cytobiologica.

[18]  J A Beliën,et al.  Origins of ... image analysis in clinical pathology. , 1997, Journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  Cleopatra Kozlowski,et al.  An entirely automated method to score DSS-induced colitis in mice by digital image analysis of pathology slides , 2013, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[20]  Vladislav Zakharov,et al.  Tissue Pattern Recognition Error Rates and Tumor Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer , 2012, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[21]  Yinhai Wang,et al.  Virtual microscopy and digital pathology in training and education , 2012, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[22]  Bruce A Beckwith,et al.  Standards to support information systems integration in anatomic pathology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[23]  J. Kononen,et al.  A high‐throughput strategy for protein profiling in cell microarrays using automated image analysis , 2007, Proteomics.

[24]  Darren Treanor,et al.  Virtual slides: an introduction , 2009 .

[25]  Neal R. Harvey,et al.  Genetic algorithm for combining new and existing image processing tools for multispectral imagery , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[26]  N. Gale,et al.  The Kaiser's cancer revisited: was Virchow totally wrong? , 2011, Virchows Archiv.

[27]  Arvydas Laurinavicius,et al.  Digital Image Analysis in Pathology: Benefits and Obligation , 2011, Analytical cellular pathology.

[28]  Steven J Potts,et al.  Digital pathology in drug discovery and development: multisite integration. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[29]  Toby C. Cornish,et al.  Whole-slide Imaging: Routine Pathologic Diagnosis , 2012, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[30]  L. Pantanowitz Digital images and the future of digital pathology , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[31]  David L Rimm,et al.  Delay to formalin fixation ‘cold ischemia time’: effect on ERBB2 detection by in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry , 2013, Modern Pathology.

[32]  Bryan F. Cox,et al.  Computer-assisted imaging algorithms facilitate histomorphometric quantification of kidney damage in rodent renal failure models , 2012, Journal of pathology informatics.

[33]  Holger Lange Digital Pathology: A Regulatory Overview , 2011 .

[34]  Kristine A. Erps,et al.  Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. , 2009, Human pathology.

[35]  Holger Lange,et al.  Evaluating tumor heterogeneity in immunohistochemistry-stained breast cancer tissue , 2012, Laboratory Investigation.

[36]  Michael C. Montalto,et al.  Autofocus methods of whole slide imaging systems and the introduction of a second-generation independent dual sensor scanning method , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[37]  Joshua D. Webster,et al.  Investigation into diagnostic agreement using automated computer-assisted histopathology pattern recognition image analysis , 2012, Journal of pathology informatics.

[38]  J. Mansfield,et al.  Multispectral Imaging , 2014, Veterinary pathology.

[39]  Thomas Kalinski,et al.  Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) as standard in digital pathology , 2012, Histopathology.

[40]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Anatomic Pathology Laboratory Information Systems: A Review , 2012, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[41]  P. R. Hof,et al.  Design-based stereology in neuroscience , 2005, Neuroscience.