Social network interventions to reduce race disparities in living kidney donation: Design and rationale of the friends and family of kidney transplant patients study (FFKTPS)

INTRODUCTION Racial/ethnic disparities in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) are a persistent challenge. Although nearly all directed donations are from members of patients' social networks, little is known about which social network members take steps toward living kidney donation, which do not, and what mechanisms contribute to racial/ethnic LDKT disparities. METHODS We describe the design and rationale of the Friends and Family of Kidney Transplant Patients Study, a factorial experimental fielding two interventions designed to promote LKD discussions. Participants are kidney transplant candidates at two centers who are interviewed and delivered an intervention by trained center research coordinators. The search intervention advises patients on which social network members are most likely to be LKD contraindication-free; the script intervention advises patients on how to initiate effective LKD discussions. Participants are randomized into four conditions: no intervention, search only, script only, or both search and script. Patients also complete a survey and optionally provide social network member contact information so they can be surveyed directly. This study will seek to enroll 200 transplant candidates. The primary outcome is LDKT receipt. Secondary outcomes include live donor screening and medical evaluations and outcomes. Tertiary outcomes include LDKT self-efficacy, concerns, knowledge, and willingness, measured before and after the interventions. CONCLUSION This study will assess the effectiveness of two interventions to promote LKD and ameliorate Black-White disparities. It will also collect unprecedented information on transplant candidates' social network members, enabling future work to address network member structural barriers to LKD.

[1]  L. Ross,et al.  Gender and race/ethnicity differences in living kidney donor demographics: Preference or disparity? , 2021, Transplantation reviews.

[2]  A. Israni,et al.  OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Kidney , 2021, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[3]  L. Collins Optimization of Behavioral, Biobehavioral, and Biomedical Interventions: The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (Most) , 2018 .

[4]  H. Traino,et al.  Communicating About Choices in Transplantation (COACH) , 2017, Progress in transplantation.

[5]  K. Simpson,et al.  Variations in coping stages for individuals with chronic kidney disease: Results from an exploratory study with patient navigators , 2016, Journal of health psychology.

[6]  Gerhard Tutz,et al.  Modeling Discrete Time-To-Event Data , 2016 .

[7]  J. Schold,et al.  Direct and Indirect Costs Following Living Kidney Donation: Findings From the KDOC Study , 2016, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[8]  E. Marcantonio,et al.  Mistrust, misperceptions, and miscommunication: a qualitative study of preferences about kidney transplantation among African Americans. , 2015, Transplantation proceedings.

[9]  K. Arriola,et al.  Living Donor Transplant Education for African American Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease , 2014, Progress in transplantation.

[10]  Kari A. Baldwin,et al.  Your Path to Transplant: a randomized controlled trial of a tailored computer education intervention to increase living donor kidney transplant , 2014, BMC Nephrology.

[11]  A. Waterman,et al.  Protocol of a cluster randomized trial of an educational intervention to increase knowledge of living donor kidney transplant among potential transplant candidates , 2013, BMC Nephrology.

[12]  N. Powe,et al.  Effectiveness of educational and social worker interventions to activate patients' discussion and pursuit of preemptive living donor kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[13]  P. Ephraim,et al.  Feasibility and acceptability of the TALK social worker intervention to improve live kidney transplantation. , 2012, Health & social work.

[14]  C. Mullins,et al.  Short-term impact of an educational program promoting live donor kidney transplantation in dialysis centers. , 2008 .

[15]  Michael L. Anderson Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects , 2008 .

[16]  K. Chavin,et al.  Racial Disparities in Living Kidney Donation: Is There a Lack of Willing Donors or an Excess of Medically Unsuitable Candidates? , 2006, Transplantation.

[17]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate , 2006 .

[18]  N. Powe,et al.  Preferences, Knowledge, Communication and Patient‐Physician Discussion of Living Kidney Transplantation in African American Families , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[19]  N. Powe,et al.  Determinants of willingness to donate living related and cadaveric organs: identifying opportunities for intervention , 2002, Transplantation.

[20]  jimi adams,et al.  To tell the truth: Measuring concordance in multiply reported network data , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[21]  W. Rogers Regression standard errors in clustered samples , 1994 .