Neighbours' talk: interspecific choruses among songbirds
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] David A Luther,et al. Production and perception of communicatory signals in a noisy environment , 2009, Biology Letters.
[2] E. Frankenberg,et al. The Adaptive Significance of Avian Mobbing , 2010 .
[3] Robert D Magrath,et al. Recognition of other species' aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[4] T. Aubin,et al. When to be a dear enemy: flexible acoustic relationships of neighbouring skylarks, Alauda arvensis , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[5] J. Hutchinson. Two explanations of the dawn chorus compared: how monotonically changing light levels favour a short break from singing , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[6] Marc Naguib,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Singing interactions in songbirds: implications for social relations and territorial settlement , 2005 .
[7] J. Tobias,et al. Signal Jamming Mediates Sexual Conflict in a Duetting Bird , 2009, Current Biology.
[8] E. Odum. Fundamentals of ecology , 1972 .
[9] R. W. Ficken,et al. Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds , 1985 .
[10] N. Gotelli,et al. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology , 2015 .
[11] R. Planqué,et al. Spectral overlap in songs and temporal overlap in a Peruvian bird assemblage , 2008 .
[12] E. Temeles. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'? , 1994, Animal Behaviour.
[13] R. Greenberg. Birds of Many Feathers: The Formation and Structure of Mixed Species Flocks of Forest Birds , 2001 .
[14] P. Richerson,et al. The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.
[15] N. Seddon. The structure, context and possible functions of solos, duets and choruses in the subdesert mesite (Monias benschi) , 2002 .
[16] H. Brumm,et al. Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[17] D. Logue. Cooperative Defence in Duet Singing Birds , 2005 .
[18] V. Bretagnolle,et al. Neighbour–stranger discrimination in the little owl, Athene noctua , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[19] Animal Communication: Timing Counts , 2007, Current Biology.
[20] John M. Burt,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Dawn chorus as an interactive communication network , 2005 .
[21] T. Krama,et al. Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[22] M. Jullien,et al. Multi-species territoriality and dynamic of neotropical forest understorey bird flocks , 1998 .
[23] M. Mönkkönen,et al. Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[24] E. Pianka,et al. Organization in Natural Assemblages of Desert Lizards and Tropical Fishes , 1990 .
[25] H. Whitehead,et al. Testing association patterns of social animals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[26] J. Tellería,et al. Fruit tracking between sites and years by birds in Mediterranean wintering grounds , 2008 .
[27] M. Hall. A Review of Vocal Duetting in Birds , 2009 .
[28] Per Berggren,et al. Mixed species groups in mammals , 2003 .
[29] Robert Planqué,et al. Spectral Overlap in Songs and Temporal Avoidance in a Peruvian Bird Assemblage , 2008 .
[30] William A. Searcy,et al. Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.
[31] Valentin Amrhein,et al. Long-term influence of simulated territorial intrusions on dawn and dusk singing in the Winter Wren: spring versus autumn , 2008, Journal of Ornithology.
[32] T. Getty. Dear Enemies and the Prisoner's Dilemma: Why Should Territorial Neighbors Form Defensive Coalitions? , 1987 .
[33] M. Naguib,et al. Vocal Interactions in Birds: The Use of Song as a Model in Communication , 2000 .
[34] E. Curio,et al. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing: I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. , 1978 .
[35] G. Parker,et al. Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.
[36] A. Galston. Fundamentals of Ecology , 1972, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.
[37] P. McGregor,et al. The signal function of overlapping singing in male robins , 1997, Animal Behaviour.
[38] A. C. Rogers,et al. Function of pair duets in the eastern whipbird: cooperative defense or sexual conflict? , 2007 .
[39] T. Krama,et al. Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[40] J. Krebs. Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): Do residents always win? , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[41] E. Pianka,et al. Ecology And Natural History Of Desert Lizards , 1986 .
[42] H. Brumm,et al. Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .
[43] D. McDonald,et al. The development of coordinated singing in cooperatively displaying long-tailed manakins , 2002 .
[44] P. Feldman. Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.
[45] W. Ji,et al. A test of the dear enemy hypothesis in female New Zealand bellbirds (Anthornis melanura): female neighbors as threats , 2008 .
[46] T. Szép,et al. Mixed species flocking of tits (Parus spp.): a field experiment , 1989, Oecologia.
[47] P. L. Wilson,et al. A test of the deceptive mimicry hypothesis in song-sharing song sparrows , 2001, Animal Behaviour.
[48] P. McGregor,et al. Is the signal value of overlapping different from that of alternating during matched singing in Great Tits , 1996 .
[49] R. Godard. Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory songbird , 1991, Nature.
[50] Singing performance, frequency matching and courtship success of long-tailed manakins (Chiroxiphia linearis) , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[51] R. D. Magrath,et al. Temporal coordination signals coalition quality , 2007, Current Biology.
[52] P. Slater,et al. Multiple functions to duet singing: hidden conflicts and apparent cooperation , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[53] Why do songbirds sing intensively at dawn? , 2002, acta ethologica.
[54] R. Macarthur. Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .
[55] W. Wickler. Vocal dueting and the pair bond I. Coyness and partner commitment. A hypothesis , 2010 .
[56] N. Mann,et al. Antiphonal four-part synchronized chorusing in a Neotropical wren , 2006, Biology Letters.
[57] Duettieren als Revieranzeige bei Vögeln , 2010 .
[58] E. Pianka. Ecology and natural history of desert lizards : analyses of the ecological niche and community structure. , 1986 .
[59] Daniel J. Mennill,et al. Frequency matching, overlapping and movement behaviour in diurnal countersinging interactions of black-capped chickadees , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[60] D. Todt,et al. Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B.) , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[61] W. J. Smith. Animal Duets: Forcing a Mate to be Attentive , 1994 .
[62] M. K. Tourtellot,et al. Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[63] David A. Luther,et al. Signaller: receiver coordination and the timing of communication in Amazonian birds , 2008, Biology Letters.
[64] Daniel J. Mennill,et al. Context-Dependent Functions of Avian Duets Revealed by Microphone-Array Recordings and Multispeaker Playback , 2008, Current Biology.
[65] Marc Naguib,et al. Non–territorial nightingales prospect territories during the dawn chorus , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[66] A. Kacelnik. The foraging efficiency of great tits (Parus major L.) in relation to light intensity , 1979, Animal Behaviour.
[67] Anastasia H Dalziell,et al. Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective. , 2007, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.
[68] E. Pianka. The structure of lizard communities , 1973 .
[69] V. Lehsten,et al. Null models for species co-occurrence patterns: assessing bias and minimum iteration number for the sequential swap , 2006 .
[70] P. Marler,et al. Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong , 2004 .
[72] M. Hall. A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[73] I. Booksmythe,et al. Interspecific assistance: fiddler crabs help heterospecific neighbours in territory defence , 2010, Biology Letters.
[74] O. Järvinen. Geographical gradients of stability in European land bird communities , 2004, Oecologia.
[75] M. Naguib,et al. Nightingales respond more strongly to vocal leaders of simulated dyadic interactions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[76] Jeremy Hyman. Seasonal Variation in Response to Neighbors and Strangers by a Territorial Songbird , 2005 .
[77] W. Hamilton,et al. The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.
[78] Marc Naguib,et al. The signal value of birdsong: empirical evidence suggests song overlapping is a signal , 2010, Animal Behaviour.