Neighbours' talk: interspecific choruses among songbirds

In territorial songbirds, duets between mates represent one of the best-known examples of communal display, with the main function being the defence of joint resources. In this study, we found evidence of a coordinated choral display performed by neighbouring heterospecific songbirds. In such choruses, most of the participating species perform a deliberate temporal overlap of songs, thus suggesting agonistic behaviour. However, they then utilize a complex form of behaviour to avoid signal jamming, making the aggressive purpose unlikely. We define these displays as “coordinated interspecific choruses”. We recorded dusk choruses of songbirds living in a mixed turkey oak wood in central Italy, and then carried out a niche overlap analysis using null models that were intended for investigations of concurrent emissions of songs, finding that species tend to sing concurrently instead of using the refractory period of another species. Among the species singing concurrently, about half used the same frequency range, but instead of finding considerable spectral overlap between their vocalizations, the number of real spectral overlaps was lower than would be expected by chance. We propose a tentative explanation for this, where such choruses are the expression of the existence of a neighbourhood of different species that has evolved a communal signal that is similar to that used by mates in a pair, i.e. coordinated vocalizations. As coordination requires experience of each other's songs, we propose that evolution has selected individuals that are more skilled at learning heterospecific songs.

[1]  David A Luther,et al.  Production and perception of communicatory signals in a noisy environment , 2009, Biology Letters.

[2]  E. Frankenberg,et al.  The Adaptive Significance of Avian Mobbing , 2010 .

[3]  Robert D Magrath,et al.  Recognition of other species' aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  T. Aubin,et al.  When to be a dear enemy: flexible acoustic relationships of neighbouring skylarks, Alauda arvensis , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  J. Hutchinson Two explanations of the dawn chorus compared: how monotonically changing light levels favour a short break from singing , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Singing interactions in songbirds: implications for social relations and territorial settlement , 2005 .

[7]  J. Tobias,et al.  Signal Jamming Mediates Sexual Conflict in a Duetting Bird , 2009, Current Biology.

[8]  E. Odum Fundamentals of ecology , 1972 .

[9]  R. W. Ficken,et al.  Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds , 1985 .

[10]  N. Gotelli,et al.  EcoSim: Null models software for ecology , 2015 .

[11]  R. Planqué,et al.  Spectral overlap in songs and temporal overlap in a Peruvian bird assemblage , 2008 .

[12]  E. Temeles The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'? , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  R. Greenberg Birds of Many Feathers: The Formation and Structure of Mixed Species Flocks of Forest Birds , 2001 .

[14]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  N. Seddon The structure, context and possible functions of solos, duets and choruses in the subdesert mesite (Monias benschi) , 2002 .

[16]  H. Brumm,et al.  Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  D. Logue Cooperative Defence in Duet Singing Birds , 2005 .

[18]  V. Bretagnolle,et al.  Neighbour–stranger discrimination in the little owl, Athene noctua , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Animal Communication: Timing Counts , 2007, Current Biology.

[20]  John M. Burt,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Dawn chorus as an interactive communication network , 2005 .

[21]  T. Krama,et al.  Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  M. Jullien,et al.  Multi-species territoriality and dynamic of neotropical forest understorey bird flocks , 1998 .

[23]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  E. Pianka,et al.  Organization in Natural Assemblages of Desert Lizards and Tropical Fishes , 1990 .

[25]  H. Whitehead,et al.  Testing association patterns of social animals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  J. Tellería,et al.  Fruit tracking between sites and years by birds in Mediterranean wintering grounds , 2008 .

[27]  M. Hall A Review of Vocal Duetting in Birds , 2009 .

[28]  Per Berggren,et al.  Mixed species groups in mammals , 2003 .

[29]  Robert Planqué,et al.  Spectral Overlap in Songs and Temporal Avoidance in a Peruvian Bird Assemblage , 2008 .

[30]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  Valentin Amrhein,et al.  Long-term influence of simulated territorial intrusions on dawn and dusk singing in the Winter Wren: spring versus autumn , 2008, Journal of Ornithology.

[32]  T. Getty Dear Enemies and the Prisoner's Dilemma: Why Should Territorial Neighbors Form Defensive Coalitions? , 1987 .

[33]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal Interactions in Birds: The Use of Song as a Model in Communication , 2000 .

[34]  E. Curio,et al.  The adaptive significance of avian mobbing: I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. , 1978 .

[35]  G. Parker,et al.  Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  A. Galston Fundamentals of Ecology , 1972, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[37]  P. McGregor,et al.  The signal function of overlapping singing in male robins , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  A. C. Rogers,et al.  Function of pair duets in the eastern whipbird: cooperative defense or sexual conflict? , 2007 .

[39]  T. Krama,et al.  Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  J. Krebs Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): Do residents always win? , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  E. Pianka,et al.  Ecology And Natural History Of Desert Lizards , 1986 .

[42]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[43]  D. McDonald,et al.  The development of coordinated singing in cooperatively displaying long-tailed manakins , 2002 .

[44]  P. Feldman Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[45]  W. Ji,et al.  A test of the dear enemy hypothesis in female New Zealand bellbirds (Anthornis melanura): female neighbors as threats , 2008 .

[46]  T. Szép,et al.  Mixed species flocking of tits (Parus spp.): a field experiment , 1989, Oecologia.

[47]  P. L. Wilson,et al.  A test of the deceptive mimicry hypothesis in song-sharing song sparrows , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  P. McGregor,et al.  Is the signal value of overlapping different from that of alternating during matched singing in Great Tits , 1996 .

[49]  R. Godard Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory songbird , 1991, Nature.

[50]  Singing performance, frequency matching and courtship success of long-tailed manakins (Chiroxiphia linearis) , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  R. D. Magrath,et al.  Temporal coordination signals coalition quality , 2007, Current Biology.

[52]  P. Slater,et al.  Multiple functions to duet singing: hidden conflicts and apparent cooperation , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  Why do songbirds sing intensively at dawn? , 2002, acta ethologica.

[54]  R. Macarthur Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[55]  W. Wickler Vocal dueting and the pair bond I. Coyness and partner commitment. A hypothesis , 2010 .

[56]  N. Mann,et al.  Antiphonal four-part synchronized chorusing in a Neotropical wren , 2006, Biology Letters.

[57]  Duettieren als Revieranzeige bei Vögeln , 2010 .

[58]  E. Pianka Ecology and natural history of desert lizards : analyses of the ecological niche and community structure. , 1986 .

[59]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Frequency matching, overlapping and movement behaviour in diurnal countersinging interactions of black-capped chickadees , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  D. Todt,et al.  Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B.) , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  W. J. Smith Animal Duets: Forcing a Mate to be Attentive , 1994 .

[62]  M. K. Tourtellot,et al.  Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  David A. Luther,et al.  Signaller: receiver coordination and the timing of communication in Amazonian birds , 2008, Biology Letters.

[64]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Context-Dependent Functions of Avian Duets Revealed by Microphone-Array Recordings and Multispeaker Playback , 2008, Current Biology.

[65]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Non–territorial nightingales prospect territories during the dawn chorus , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  A. Kacelnik The foraging efficiency of great tits (Parus major L.) in relation to light intensity , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  Anastasia H Dalziell,et al.  Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective. , 2007, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[68]  E. Pianka The structure of lizard communities , 1973 .

[69]  V. Lehsten,et al.  Null models for species co-occurrence patterns: assessing bias and minimum iteration number for the sequential swap , 2006 .

[70]  P. Marler,et al.  Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong , 2004 .

[71]  Convergent vocal strategies of males and females are consistent with a cooperative function of duetting in Australian magpie-larks , 2006 .

[72]  M. Hall A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[73]  I. Booksmythe,et al.  Interspecific assistance: fiddler crabs help heterospecific neighbours in territory defence , 2010, Biology Letters.

[74]  O. Järvinen Geographical gradients of stability in European land bird communities , 2004, Oecologia.

[75]  M. Naguib,et al.  Nightingales respond more strongly to vocal leaders of simulated dyadic interactions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  Jeremy Hyman Seasonal Variation in Response to Neighbors and Strangers by a Territorial Songbird , 2005 .

[77]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[78]  Marc Naguib,et al.  The signal value of birdsong: empirical evidence suggests song overlapping is a signal , 2010, Animal Behaviour.