Lightweight design of electric bus roof structure using multi-material topology optimisation

This paper presents a multi-material topology optimisation (MMTO) process for the lightweight design of an electric bus roof structure including the self-weight. The usage of electric buses is increasing owing to environmental issues. However, it is challenging to design a lightweight structure, because the heavy battery pack mounted on the roof increases the deformation and reduces the safety. In a design including the self-weight, the appropriate distribution of multiple materials improves the performance more than that of a single material. The MMTO method has been applied to identify the optimal distribution of multiple materials. However, in the real-engineering problem, only a simple objective function such as compliance and a single constraint function such as the volume of material have been considered, whereas the mass reduction is the most important factor. In this paper, an MMTO process is proposed for the lightweight design of the bus roof structure to consider multiple displacement constraints including the self-weight. To control the complexity of the distribution of multiple materials for improving the manufacturability, the welding surface function is proposed. An optimisation process was constructed that can handle the complex finite-element model and multiple load cases, and it was validated according to the well-known compliance minimisation problem. Mass reduction was achieved via the lightweight optimisation, and the interfacial area between the different materials was reduced by employing the welding surface function.

[1]  Wenjie Zuo,et al.  Variable Cross-Section Rectangular Beam and Sensitivity Analysis for Lightweight Design of Bus Frame , 2018, International Journal of Automotive Technology.

[2]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000 , 2014 .

[3]  Takayuki Yamada,et al.  A topology optimization method based on the level set method incorporating a fictitious interface energy , 2010 .

[4]  Anil Cherukuri Potential Weight Saving in Buses Through Multi Material Approach , 2014 .

[5]  Il Yong Kim,et al.  Multi-material topology optimization for practical lightweight design , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[6]  O. Sigmund Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization , 2007 .

[7]  Kwang-Woo Jeon,et al.  A study on the crashworthiness and rollover characteristics of low-floor bus made of sandwich composites , 2009 .

[8]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  Color level sets: a multi-phase method for structural topology optimization with multiple materials , 2004 .

[9]  Erik Lund,et al.  Discrete material optimization of general composite shell structures , 2005 .

[10]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Automotive applications of topology optimization , 1995 .

[11]  K. Saitou,et al.  Multi-material topology optimization using ordered SIMP interpolation , 2016, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[12]  Takayuki Yamada,et al.  A level set-based topology optimization method for optimal manifold designs with flow uniformity in plate-type microchannel reactors , 2017 .

[13]  Charlie C. L. Wang,et al.  Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing , 2018 .

[14]  Il Yong Kim,et al.  Multi-material topology optimization for automotive design problems , 2018 .

[15]  Weihong Zhang,et al.  CBS-based topology optimization including design-dependent body loads , 2017 .

[16]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization , 1999 .

[17]  P. Duysinx,et al.  Note on topology optimization of continuum structures including self-weight , 2005 .

[18]  Sandeep Sharma,et al.  Development of Methodology for Full Bus Body Optimisation and Strengthening by Numerical Simulation , 2017 .

[19]  Liangjin Gui,et al.  Multi-objective optimization for bus body with strength and rollover safety constraints based on surrogate models , 2011 .

[20]  Xiaolei Yan,et al.  Multi-objective topology optimization of a vehicle door using multiple material tailor-welded blank (TWB) technology , 2018, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[21]  F Lan,et al.  Comparative analysis for bus side structures and lightweight optimization , 2004 .

[22]  Yongsheng Ma,et al.  A new multi-material level set topology optimization method with the length scale control capability , 2018 .

[23]  Shinji Nishiwaki,et al.  Topology optimization of magnetic actuator based on a level-set and a phase-field approach , 2010, Digests of the 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation.

[24]  Andrea Baldini,et al.  High performance automotive chassis design: a topology optimization based approach , 2011 .

[25]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Topology optimization with additive manufacturing consideration for vehicle load path development , 2018 .

[26]  Tong Gao,et al.  A mass constraint formulation for structural topology optimization with multiphase materials , 2011 .

[27]  Stefan Menzel,et al.  Preference-based topology optimization for vehicle concept design with concurrent static and crash load cases , 2017 .

[28]  David J. Munk,et al.  A bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization algorithm for mass minimization with multiple structural constraints , 2018, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[29]  Li Xin,et al.  Lightweight design of bus frames from multi-material topology optimization to cross-sectional size optimization , 2018, Engineering Optimization.

[30]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[31]  Liwen Guan,et al.  Guide-Weight method for topology optimization of continuum structures including body forces , 2013 .

[32]  Wei Zhong,et al.  Multi-objective topology and sizing optimization of bus body frame , 2016 .

[33]  Z. Kang,et al.  A multi-material level set-based topology and shape optimization method , 2015 .

[34]  B. L. Boada,et al.  Torsional stiffness and weight optimization of a real bus structure , 2010 .