Human Neuroscience Hypothesis and Theory Article Two Systems of Non-symbolic Numerical Cognition

Studies of human adults, infants, and non-human animals demonstrate that non-symbolic numerical cognition is supported by at least two distinct cognitive systems: a “parallel individuation system” that encodes the numerical identity of individual items and an “approximate number system” that encodes the approximate numerical magnitude, or numerosity, of a set. The exact nature and role of these systems, however, have been debated for over a 100-years. Some argue that the non-symbolic representation of small numbers (<4) is carried out solely by the parallel individuation system and the non-symbolic representation of large numbers (>4) is carried out solely by the approximate number system. Others argue that all numbers are represented by the approximate number system. This debate has been fueled largely by some studies showing dissociations between small and large number processing and other studies showing similar processing of small and large numbers. Recent work has addressed this debate by showing that the two systems are present and distinct from early infancy, persist despite the acquisition of a symbolic number system, activate distinct cortical networks, and engage differentially based attentional constraints. Based on the recent discoveries, I provide a hypothesis that may explain the puzzling findings and makes testable predictions as to when each system will be engaged. In particular, when items are presented under conditions that allow selection of individuals, they will be represented as distinct mental items through parallel individuation and not as a numerical magnitude. In contrast, when items are presented outside attentional limits (e.g., too many, too close together, under high attentional load), they will be represented as a single mental numerical magnitude and not as distinct mental items. These predictions provide a basis on which researchers can further investigate the role of each system in the development of uniquely human numerical thought.

[1]  Fei Xu,et al.  Linking Visual Attention and Number Processing in the Brain: The Role of the Temporo-parietal Junction in Small and Large Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Number Comparison , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[5]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Subitizing requires attention , 2008 .

[6]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[7]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  A. Anastasi Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Chang Liu,et al.  Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Distinctive Neural Mechanisms Supporting Visual Object Individuation and Identification , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  Determinants of reaction time for digit inequality judgments , 1973 .

[12]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[14]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  Small and large number discrimination in guppies , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[16]  Melanie Palomares,et al.  The Effect of Viewing Eccentricity on Enumeration , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  W. Ma,et al.  A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[18]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  A Candidate for the Attentional Bottleneck: Set-size Specific Modulation of the Right TPJ during Attentive Enumeration , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Susan Carey,et al.  What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge , 1999 .

[21]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[22]  David C Burr,et al.  Adaptation affects both high and low (subitized) numbers under conditions of high attentional load. , 2011, Seeing and perceiving.

[23]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[24]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  R. Church,et al.  Alternative representations of time, number, and rate , 1990, Cognition.

[26]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[27]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Infants’ auditory enumeration: Evidence for analog magnitudes in the small number range , 2009, Cognition.

[28]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[29]  D. Melcher,et al.  Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity , 2011, Cognition.

[30]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A Labeled-Line Code for Small and Large Numerosities in the Monkey Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[32]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of processing nonsymbolic number: An event‐related potential source localization study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Sara Cordes,et al.  Crossing the divide: infants discriminate small from large numerosities. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[34]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Discrimination of small numerosities in young chicks. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[35]  S. Carey,et al.  On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays , 2005, Cognition.

[36]  J. B.,et al.  The Power of Numerical Discrimination , 1871, Nature.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[39]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[40]  S. Carey,et al.  The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes , 2002, Psychological science.

[41]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Multiple Spatially Overlapping Sets Can Be Enumerated in Parallel , 2006, Psychological science.

[42]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[43]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Discrimination of Large and Small Numerosities by Human Infants , 2004 .

[44]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  A Computational Model of Number Comparison , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[45]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Small and large number processing in infants and toddlers with Williams syndrome. , 2008, Developmental science.

[47]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Neural signatures of number processing in human infants: evidence for two core systems underlying numerical cognition. , 2011, Developmental science.

[48]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn (1992) ☆ , 1995 .

[51]  Justin N Wood,et al.  Infants' enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. , 2005, Developmental science.

[52]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[53]  David C Burr,et al.  Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[54]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Imprinted numbers: newborn chicks' sensitivity to number vs. continuous extent of objects they have been reared with. , 2010, Developmental science.

[55]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[56]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Representation of number in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[57]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Individual differences in children’s mathematical competence are related to the intentional but not automatic processing of Arabic numerals , 2011, Cognition.

[58]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  The Mathematical Brain , 1999 .

[59]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  The role of attention in subitizing: Is the magical number 1? , 2008 .

[60]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  Spatial Attention Determines the Nature of Nonverbal Number Representation , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Does Subitizing Reflect Numerical Estimation? , 2022 .

[62]  Susan Carey,et al.  One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles , 2007, Cognition.

[63]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[64]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[66]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain : the role of the right temporo-parietal junction in small and large non-symbolic number comparison , 2007 .

[67]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling , 2010, Cognition.

[68]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention Response Functions Characterizing Brain Areas Using fMRI Activation during Parametric Variations of Attentional Load , 2001, Neuron.

[69]  Lisa Feigenson,et al.  Tracking individuals via object-files: evidence from infants' manual search , 2003 .

[70]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Modulating Attentional Load Affects Numerosity Estimation: Evidence against a Pre-Attentive Subitizing Mechanism , 2008, PloS one.

[71]  Brian J. Scholl Objects and attention , 2002 .

[72]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[73]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[74]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[75]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[76]  E. Vogel,et al.  Neural Measures of Individual Differences in Selecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .