Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom

The objective of the present study was to examine to what extent autonomy in problem-based learning (PBL) results in cognitive engagement with the topic at hand. To that end, a short self-report instrument was devised and validated. Moreover, it was examined how cognitive engagement develops as a function of the learning process and the extent to which cognitive engagement determines subsequent levels of cognitive engagement during a one-day PBL event. Data were analyzed by means of confirmatory factor analysis, repeated measures ANOVA, and path analysis. The results showed that the new measure of situational cognitive engagement is valid and reliable. Furthermore, the results revealed that students’ cognitive engagement significantly increased as a function of the learning event. Implications of these findings for PBL are discussed.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  M. Barrett,et al.  Controlling teaching strategies: Undermining children's self-determination and performance. , 1990 .

[3]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[4]  James J. Appleton,et al.  Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument , 2006 .

[5]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[6]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .

[7]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: toward a motivational model of high school dropout. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  R. Ryan,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Origins and Pawns in the Classroom: Self-Report and Projective Assessments of Individual Differences in Children's Perceptions , 1986 .

[9]  E. Deci,et al.  Handbook of Self-Determination Research , 2002 .

[10]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  One-day, one-problem: An approach to problem-based learning , 2012 .

[11]  Mar ianne Mise,et al.  Children Who Do Well in School : Individual Differences in Perceived Competence and Autonomy in Above-Average Children , 2001 .

[12]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[13]  Jorge J. Wellmann.  The National Survey of Student Engagement , 2010 .

[14]  C. Mariné,et al.  Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Goal Orientation, Cognitive Engagement, and Achievement: A Test of Dweck's Model with Returning to School Adults. , 2005 .

[15]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[16]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[17]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[18]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[19]  H. Schmidt.  Foundations of problem‐based learning: some explanatory notes , 1993, Medical education.

[20]  J. Meece,et al.  Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities , 1988 .

[21]  M. Barrett,et al.  Use of techniques promoting students' self-determination: Effects on students' analytic problem-solving skills , 1993 .

[22]  Simone Volet,et al.  Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students' goals , 1997 .

[23]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[24]  R. Cudeck,et al.  Structural equation models: Present and Future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog. , 2001 .

[25]  Sudhir Mehta,et al.  Higher Education Research & Development , 2022 .

[26]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  Effects of problem-based discussion on studying a subsequent text: A randomized trial among first year medical students , 2001 .

[27]  Jennifer C. Richardson,et al.  The Role of Students' Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning , 2006 .

[28]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Constructivist, Problem-Based Learning Does Work: A Meta-Analysis of Curricular Comparisons Involving a Single Medical School , 2009 .

[29]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement , 2006 .

[30]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Role Of Interest In Learning And Development , 1994 .

[31]  J. Reeve,et al.  Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. , 2002 .

[32]  C. Wolters,et al.  The relation between high school students' motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. , 1999 .

[33]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[34]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Characteristics of the Rewarder and Intrinsic Motivation of the Rewardee , 2005 .

[35]  Toni M. Kempler,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Motivation and Cognitive Engagement in Learning Environments , 2005 .

[36]  E. Deci.  The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. , 1992 .

[37]  S. Hidi,et al.  Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes That Mediate Their Relationship. , 2002 .

[38]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. , 1992 .

[39]  R. Sawyer.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[40]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Influences on cognitive engagement: epistemological beliefs and need for closure. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[41]  E. Mandinach,et al.  The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation , 1983 .

[42]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Increasing Situational Interest in the Classroom , 2001 .

[43]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivation and Creativity: Effects of Motivational Orientation on Creative Writers , 1985 .

[44]  B. Thompson,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLE SIZE, ESTIMATION METHODS, AND MODEL SPECIFICATION ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING FIT INDEXES , 1999 .

[45]  Panagiota Metallidou,et al.  Motivational beliefs, cognitive engagement, and achievement in language and mathematics in elementary school children. , 2007, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[46]  A. Assor,et al.  Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[47]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Effect of Choice on Cognitive and Affective Engagement , 2003 .

[48]  H. Schmidt.  Problem‐based learning: rationale and description , 1983, Medical education.

[49]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Setting limits on children's behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity , 1984 .