Managing Coopetition in Supplier Networks – A Paradox Perspective

Scholars in the field of supply chain management have started to embrace the idea of simultaneous cooperation and competition (“coopetition”) in supplier networks but have mainly looked at coopetition from a structural perspective. In this article, we complement the structural view with a paradox perspective to investigate the competitive tensions that evolve when buying firms are trying to engage both forces simultaneously in their relations with core suppliers. Our comparative case study of four major carmakers reveals different strategies buying firms use to manage coopetition in their supplier networks, the responses they trigger from their suppliers, and the resulting paradoxical tensions. Our inductive analysis reveals that irrespective of the managing approach chosen, the “coopetition capabilities” of the buying firm determines whether negative tension dynamics can be avoided. At the core of such coopetition capabilities are “evaluative capabilities” allowing the buyer to provide cost improvement suggestions to suppliers for the sake of joint value creation and to control the division of value appropriation through a deeper understanding of the supplier's cost structures. By highlighting the nature of coopetition capabilities as organizational capabilities, we also contribute to paradox research, going beyond its current focus on the individual cognitions of managers.

[1]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Katsuki Aoki,et al.  The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer-Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case , 2017, Organ. Sci..

[3]  M. Bengtsson,et al.  Paradox at an inter-firm level : a coopetition lens , 2017 .

[4]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Creating and Capturing Value in Repeated Exchange Relationships: The Second Paradox of Embeddedness , 2017, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Creating and Capturing Value in Repeated Exchange Relationships: Managing a Second Paradox of Embeddedness , 2017 .

[6]  A. H. van de Ven,et al.  Integrating Dialectical and Paradox Perspectives on Managing Contradictions in Organizations , 2017 .

[7]  Scott Banghart,et al.  Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach† , 2016 .

[8]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward , 2016 .

[9]  Frank L. Montabon,et al.  Making Sustainability Sustainable , 2016 .

[10]  C. Busse Doing Well by Doing Good? The Self-interest of Buying Firms and Sustainable Supply Chain Management , 2016 .

[11]  M. Bastl,et al.  Relationship Determinants of Performance in Service Triads: A Configurational Approach , 2016 .

[12]  M. Bengtsson,et al.  The coopetition paradox and tension: The moderating role of coopetition capability , 2016 .

[13]  L. V. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Coopetition as a Paradox: Integrative Approaches in a Multi-Company, Cross-Sector Partnership , 2016 .

[14]  Gordon Müller-Seitz,et al.  Managing Inter-Organizational Relations , 2016 .

[15]  D. Power,et al.  Building Bridges : Toward Alternative Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management , 2016 .

[16]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Competition or Cooperation? Promoting Supplier Performance with Incentives Under Varying Conditions of Dependence , 2015 .

[17]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Deep, Sticky, Transient, and Gracious: An Expanded Buyer–Supplier Relationship Typology , 2015 .

[18]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Reorienting and Recalibrating Inter-organizational Relationships: Strategies for Achieving Optimal Trust , 2015 .

[19]  Paavo Ritala,et al.  Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: A longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels , 2014 .

[20]  Wendy K. Smith Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .

[21]  Surya D. Pathak,et al.  Toward a structural view of co‐opetition in supply networks , 2014 .

[22]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Renaissance of case research as a scientific method , 2014 .

[23]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Functions of Dysfunction , 2014 .

[24]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Paradox as a Metatheoretical Perspective , 2014 .

[25]  M. Bengtsson,et al.  The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels , 2014 .

[26]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve , 2013 .

[27]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Toward a Theory of Multi-Tier Supply Chain Management , 2013 .

[28]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[29]  Carl Marcus Wallenburg,et al.  Operational Governance in Horizontal Cooperations of Logistics Service Providers: Performance Effects and the Moderating Role of Cooperation Complexity , 2012 .

[30]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  Overcoming Network Overload and Redundancy in Interorganizational Networks: The Roles of Potential and Latent Ties , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Miriam Wilhelm,et al.  Managing coopetition through horizontal supply chain relations: Linking dyadic and network levels of analysis , 2011 .

[32]  L. Argote,et al.  Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration , 2011 .

[33]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management , 2011 .

[34]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆ , 2011 .

[35]  Shyh-Rong Fang,et al.  Dark side of relationships: A tensions-based view , 2011 .

[36]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation , 2011 .

[37]  Mei Li,et al.  Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications , 2011 .

[38]  Violina P. Rindova,et al.  MOVING FROM IDEAS TO A THEORETICAL CONTRIBUTION: COMMENTS ON THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING THEORY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH , 2011 .

[39]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Bright Side and Dark Side of Embedded Ties in Business-to-Business Innovation , 2011 .

[40]  Anne Parmigiani,et al.  Efficiency meets accountability: Performance implications of supply chain configuration, control, and capabilities , 2011 .

[41]  Melanie Windolph,et al.  The effect of relational factors on open-book accounting and inter-organizational cost management in buyer–supplier partnerships , 2011 .

[42]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Coopetitive Buyer-Supplier Relationship: An Investigation of Bargaining Power, Relational Context, and Investment Strategies , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[43]  Yuan Li,et al.  Co-opetition, distributor's entrepreneurial orientation and manufacturer's knowledge acquisition: Evidence from China , 2011 .

[44]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[45]  J. Wincent,et al.  Coopetition : new ideas for a new paradigm , 2010 .

[46]  Frank Figge,et al.  [Editorial] Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it , 2010 .

[47]  Sara Lindblom,et al.  Co Opetition , 2010 .

[48]  P. Ritala,et al.  What's in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition , 2009 .

[49]  W. Mitchell,et al.  The Hollow Corporation Revisited: Can Governance Mechanisms Substitute for Technical Expertise in Managing Buyer-Supplier Relationships? , 2009 .

[50]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China , 2009 .

[51]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  TRIADS IN SUPPLY NETWORKS: THEORIZING BUYER–SUPPLIER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 2009 .

[53]  M. Gibbert,et al.  What passes as a rigorous case study , 2008 .

[54]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  BUYER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: DERIVED VALUE OVER TWO DECADES , 2008 .

[55]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[56]  John Kyle Dorton,et al.  Extreme Toyota : radical contradictions that drive success at the world's best manufacturer , 2008 .

[57]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Competitive and Cooperative Positioning in Supply Chain Logistics Relationships , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[58]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development , 2007 .

[59]  A. Tiwana,et al.  Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances , 2007 .

[60]  Anne Parmigiani,et al.  Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? An Investigation of Concurrent Sourcing , 2007 .

[61]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[62]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Relation‐specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships , 2006 .

[63]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies , 2005 .

[64]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[65]  H. Kulmala,et al.  Open-book accounting in networks Potential achievements and reasons for failures , 2005 .

[66]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[67]  Erin Anderson,et al.  The Dark Side of Close Relationships , 2005 .

[68]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[69]  David A. Johnston,et al.  Effects of supplier trust on performance of cooperative supplier relationships , 2004 .

[70]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[71]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[72]  Marianne W. Lewis Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[73]  M. Bengtsson,et al.  ”Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously , 2000 .

[74]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[75]  T. Das,et al.  Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective , 2000 .

[76]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[77]  武石 彰,et al.  Knowledge partitioning in the inter-firm division of labor : the case of automotive product development , 1999 .

[78]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[79]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships , 1998 .

[80]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  COMPETITION, COOPERATION, AND THE SEARCH FOR ECONOMIC RENTS: A SYNCRETIC MODEL , 1997 .

[81]  Chris Carr,et al.  Total cost control: Nissan and its U.K. supplier partnerships , 1995 .

[82]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[83]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  4 Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry☆ , 1994 .

[84]  M. Sako,et al.  Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Japan. , 1994 .

[85]  James Richardson PARALLEL SOURCING AND SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE IN THE JAPANESE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY , 1993 .

[86]  Max Munday,et al.  Accounting cost data disclosure and buyer-supplier partnerships—a research note , 1992 .

[87]  K. Cameron,et al.  Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .

[88]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[89]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[90]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .

[91]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .