A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research

We present a review and analysis of the rich body of research on the adoption and diffusion of IT-based innovations by individuals and organizations. Our review analyzes 48 empirical studies on individual and 51 studies on organizational IT adoption published between 1992 and 2003. In total, the sample contains 135 independent variables, eight dependent variables, and 505 relationships between independent and dependent variables. Furthermore, our sample includes both quantitative and qualitative studies. We were able to include qualitative studies because of a unique coding scheme, which can easily be replicated in other reviews. We use this sample to assess predictors, linkages, and biases in individual and organizational IT adoption research. The best predictors of individual IT adoption include Perceived Usefulness, Top Management Support, Computer Experience, Behavioral Intention, and User Support. The best predictors of IT adoption by organizations were Top Management Support, External Pressure, Professionalism of the IS Unit, and External Information Sources. At the level of independent variables, Top Management Support stands as the main linkage between individual and organizational IT adoption. But at an aggregate level, two collections of independent variables were good predictors of both individual and organizational IT adoption. These were innovation characteristics and organizational characteristics. Thus, we can consistently say that generic characteristics of the innovation and characteristics of the organization are strong predictors of IT adoption by both individuals and organizations. Based on an assessment of the predictors, linkages, and known biases, we prescribe 10 areas for further exploration.

[1]  Edward G. Cale,et al.  Factors affecting the implementation outcome of a mainframe software package: A longitudinal study , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[2]  V. Grover.  An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems* , 1993 .

[3]  L. Chan,et al.  The adoption of new technology: the case of object-oriented computing in software companies , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[4]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..

[5]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[9]  D. Godschalk,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS IN ADOPTION OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS: A LOCAL GOVERNMENT CASE STUDY , 1996 .

[10]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  A logic programming framework for planning and simulation , 1986 .

[11]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Factors influencing the formation of a user's perceptions and use of a DSS software innovation , 2001, DATB.

[12]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[13]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[14]  He Yan,et al.  Communication: CAD/CAM adoption in US textile and apparel industries , 2002 .

[15]  H. Willmott.  Breaking the Paradigm Mentality , 1993 .

[16]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  Adoption and implementation of digital-imaging technology in the banking and insurance industries , 1997 .

[17]  Mary B. Alexander,et al.  The diffusion of database machines , 1992, DATB.

[18]  LegrisPaul,et al.  Why do people use information technology , 2003 .

[19]  Varun Grover,et al.  The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: The IS executive's perspective , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[20]  T. Astebro,et al.  The effect of management and social interaction on the intra-firm diffusion of electronic mail systems , 1995 .

[21]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  PremkumarG.,et al.  Adoption of computer aided software engineering (CASE) technology , 1995 .

[23]  F. N. Ford,et al.  Intraorganizational Versus Interorganizational Uses and Benefits of Electronic Mail , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[24]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Force of Habit and Information Systems Usage: Theory and Initial Validation , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  J. Thong,et al.  CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses , 1995 .

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[27]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Lyne Bouchard,et al.  Decision Criteria in the Adoption of EDI , 1993, ICIS.

[29]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[31]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan , 2000 .

[32]  B PrescottMary,et al.  Information technology innovations , 1995 .

[33]  Said S. Al-Gahtani,et al.  The Applicability of TAM Outside North America: An Empirical Test in the United Kingdom , 2001, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[34]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers , 1993, MIS Q..

[36]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[38]  Steven R. Gordon,et al.  Organizational hurdles to distributed database management systems (DDBMS) adoption , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[40]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Factors important to expert systems success a field test , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[41]  David Wilemon,et al.  Assimilating information technology innovations: strategies and moderating influences , 1997 .

[42]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  G. Rose,et al.  PREDICTING GENERAL IT USE : APPLYING TAM TO THE ARABIC WORLD , 1998 .

[44]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[45]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[47]  Susan J. Harrington,et al.  Telework: an innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon? , 1995, DATB.

[48]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[49]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  J. Pennings,et al.  The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry , 1992 .

[51]  Vincent S. Lai,et al.  A model of ISDN (integrated services digital network) adoption in U.S. corporations , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[52]  W ChinWynne,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS , 1995 .

[53]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[54]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Relationships among End-User Information Systems Acceptance, Training, and Effectiveness , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  Arun Rai,et al.  An Organizational Context for CASE Innovation , 1993 .

[57]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[58]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry , 1997 .

[59]  Qing Hu,et al.  Research Report: Diffusion of Information Systems Outsourcing: A Reevaluation of Influence Sources , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The impact of case on IS professionals' work and motivation to use case , 1997, ICIS '97.

[61]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[62]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[63]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[64]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[65]  Jong-min Choe,et al.  The Relationships among Performance of Accounting Information Systems, Influence Factors, and Evolution Level of Information Systems , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Assessing Expert Systems Impact on Users' Jobs , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[68]  John Day,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Innovation Characteristics on Intention to Use Groupware , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[69]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[70]  Mark Vandenbosch,et al.  Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions - Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[71]  Varun Grover,et al.  An examination of DBMS adoption and success in American organizations , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[72]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[73]  Sue A. Conger,et al.  INNOVATIONS : A CLASSIFICATION BY IT LOCUS OF IMPACT AND RESEARCH APPROACH , 2002 .

[74]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Engagement of External Expertise in Information Systems Implementation , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Determinants of EIS use: Testing a behavioral model, , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[76]  Marvin V. Zelkowitz,et al.  Software engineering technology infusion within NASA , 1996 .

[77]  Michael Potter,et al.  Adoption of computer aided software engineering (CASE) technology: an innovation adoption perspective , 1995, DATB.

[78]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[79]  Arun Rai,et al.  External information source and channel effectiveness and the diffusion of CASE innovations: an empirical study , 1995 .

[80]  Ritu Agarwal.  Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies , 2000 .

[81]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Organizational Adoption of Microcomputer Technology: The Role of Sector , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[82]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[83]  David Gefen,et al.  The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 1998, DATB.

[84]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[85]  GefenDavid,et al.  Gender differences in the perception and use of E-mail , 1997 .

[86]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[87]  Anand S. Kunnathur,et al.  Expert systems adoption. An analytical study of managerial issues and concerns , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[88]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[90]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring technology incorporation/infusion , 1992 .

[91]  Cynthia P. Ruppel,et al.  Facilitating Innovation Adoption and Diffusion: The Case of Telework , 1998 .

[92]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[93]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[94]  Varun Grover,et al.  Information technology innovations: general diffusion patterns and its relationships to innovation characteristics , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[95]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[96]  Cynthia M. Jackson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System , 1997 .

[97]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[98]  Lawrence Loh,et al.  Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[99]  J GallivanMichael.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations , 2001 .

[100]  S. Clark,et al.  EDI Adoption and Implementation: A Focus on Interorganizational Linkages , 1992 .

[101]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[102]  Jin K. Han,et al.  Managing Intraorganizational Diffusion of Innovations Impact of Buying Center Dynamics and Environments , 2002 .

[103]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Strategies for Implementation Research: Combining Research Methods , 1992, ICIS.

[104]  Soon Ang,et al.  The Adoption of TradeNet by the Trading Community: An Empirical Analysis , 1994, ICIS.

[105]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Swiftness and Intensity of Administrative Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study of TQM in Information Systems , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[106]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[107]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  Middle Managers' Contribution to Implemented Information Technology Innovation , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[108]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[109]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[110]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants and outcomes of electronic data interchange diffusion , 1995 .

[111]  S. Ghoneim,et al.  Drivers and barriers to adopting EDI: a sector analysis of UK industry , 1996 .

[112]  Muhammad A. Al-Khaldi,et al.  The influence of attitudes on personal computer utilization among knowledge workers: the case of Saudi Arabia , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[113]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[114]  Jaak Jurison,et al.  Perceived Value and Technology Adoption Across Four End User Groups , 2000, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[115]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[116]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[117]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[118]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[119]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[120]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems as innovation: A study of the innovation process , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[121]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[122]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[123]  Ken Peffers,et al.  Competitor and vendor influence on the adoption of innovative applications in electronic commerce , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[124]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Innovation Diffusion Theory as a Predictor of Adoption Intention for Financial EDI , 1995, ICIS.

[125]  Varun Grover,et al.  Empirical Evidence on Swanson's Tri-Core Model of Information Systems Innovation , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[126]  Margaret Tan,et al.  The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[127]  I. Benbasat,et al.  Adopting information technology in hospitals: the relationship between attitudes/expectations and behavior. , 1994, Hospital & health services administration.

[128]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[129]  Garth Saloner,et al.  Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Adoption of Technologies Uith Network Effects: an Empirical Examination of the Adoption of Automated Teller Machines , 2022 .

[130]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..