The effect of "here and now" learning on student engagement and academic achievement

Abstract: Commitment, persistence and effort have long been considered critical components for an individual's academic success. Yet, according to the old proverb, two heads are better than one and collaborative learning may yield greater benefits than what might be achieved by an individual. Because of this, collaborative learning has been labelled a “social imperative” (DuFour & Marzano, ) that has a positive impact on individual learning behaviours, academic outcomes and the overall level of group knowledge. As such, the need for collaborative learning has become an increasingly important factor in instructional design. This is especially so in the modern technologically advanced world, where learning is no longer constrained by time or place. Instead porous boundaries that allow round‐the‐clock, “here and now” learning (Martin & Ertzberger, ) are shifting the locus of control from instructor to student and creating a new breed of active learners. The current study involves a quasi‐experimental, between‐subjects design, where the effects of “here and now” learning on student engagement and academic achievement are examined. The study develops and tests a low‐investment blended learning approach, using Facebook as the asynchronous engagement platform to facilitate collaboration outside the classroom. Findings from the study show “here and now” learning has a positive influence on student learning behaviours, student engagement and academic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  J. Finn.  Withdrawing From School , 1989 .

[2]  A. Astin.  Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. , 1999 .

[3]  Robert Z. Zheng,et al.  Effects of multimedia on cognitive load, self-efficacy, and multiple rule-based problem solving , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Rico Baldegger,et al.  A Global Classroom? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Global Virtual Collaboration as a Teaching Tool in Management Education , 2013 .

[5]  Florence Martin,et al.  Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[7]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[8]  Shouping Hu.  Scholarship Awards, College Choice, and Student Engagement in College Activities: A Study of High-Achieving Low-Income Students of Color , 2010 .

[9]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  A. Hayes.  An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation , 2015, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  Paul D. Umbach,et al.  Faculty do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement , 2005 .

[12]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Seven Affordances of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: How to Support Collaborative Learning? How Can Technologies Help? , 2016 .

[13]  J. Janssen,et al.  Coordinated Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Awareness and Awareness Tools , 2013 .

[14]  E. Watkins.  Constructive and Unconstructive Repetitive Thought , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Satterthwaite Fe.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[16]  F. Fischer,et al.  Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013, Educational psychologist.

[17]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to Introduce Wiki Environments in Blended-Learning Pedagogies: Evidence From a Business Capstone Course , 2012 .

[18]  Hans van der Meij,et al.  Learning from games: Does collaboration help? , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  L. Morris,et al.  Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  An Investigation of Epistemological and Social Dimensions of Teaching in Online Learning Environments , 2006 .

[21]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[22]  J. Reeve.  A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement , 2012 .

[23]  E. Mandinach,et al.  The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation , 1983 .

[24]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students' learning performance in science courses , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[25]  R. Brodie,et al.  Customer Engagement , 2011 .

[26]  Soon Ang,et al.  From Experience to Experiential Learning: Cultural Intelligence as a Learning Capability for Global Leader Development , 2009 .

[27]  Mei Liu,et al.  Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement , 2004 .

[29]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[30]  Judith Ramsay,et al.  The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[31]  Mathew B. Chylinski.  Cash for Comment , 2010 .

[32]  J. Zaichkowsky.  Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[33]  Marc A. Brackett,et al.  Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement , 2012 .

[34]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[35]  Stephen K. Koernig,et al.  Web 2.0 and Marketing Education: Explanations and Experiential Applications , 2011 .

[36]  David S. Ackerman,et al.  Instructor, Student, and Employer Perceptions on Preparing Marketing Students for Changing Business Landscapes , 2003 .

[37]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[38]  Lorena Blasco-Arcas,et al.  Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Gavin Northey,et al.  Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning , 2015 .

[40]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Engagement in Academic Work: The Role of Learning Goals, Future Consequences, Pleasing Others, and Perceived Ability , 1996, Contemporary educational psychology.

[41]  Mary Ainley,et al.  Styles of engagement with learning: multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement , 1993 .

[42]  Francis Gouillart,et al.  Build the co-creative enterprise. , 2010, Harvard business review.

[43]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[44]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[45]  J. Bowden.  The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework , 2009 .

[46]  C. W. Park,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands , 2005 .

[47]  H. Wilson,et al.  Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives , 2010 .