Hiding responses of locusts to approaching objects

Locusts, Locusta migratoria, sitting on a plant stem hide from dark moving or expanding shapes in their environment. The fore- and middle legs perform this avoidance response by making lateral tilting movements, while the hindlegs slide laterally and guide rotation of the posterior body over the stem. During larger turns, the legs take lateral steps when lateral tilting is limited by the joints. Slow hiding movements of less than 300 degrees s-1 of angular velocity are induced by slowly changing (looming) shapes, and interposed stops or slowing of the movement can delay the progress of this hiding manoeuvre. Fast hiding movements with angular velocities between 120 degrees s-1 and 860 degrees s-1 proceed continuously and rapidly in response to rapidly expanding stimuli. Hiding responses to expanding shapes occur only after the expanding image has exceeded a threshold visual angle of 8-9.5 degrees. Hiding response latencies range between 220 ms and 1.2 s for fast hiding and are approximately 1.2 s for most slow hiding responses. Predator-avoidance responses such as freezing, jerking, crouching, walking backwards, dropping or jumping can be used instead of or in conjunction with hiding behaviour. We conclude that the fast hiding behaviour of locusts is a specific goal-directed type of optomotor behaviour requiring positional information from small-field detectors of shape expansion in the interneurone layers of the locust eye.

[1]  P. Kevan,et al.  PREDATOR AVOIDANCE POSTURING OF GRASSHOPPERS (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) FROM THE COLORADO ALPINE AND PLAINS , 1983, The Canadian Entomologist.

[2]  Robertson,et al.  Thermal avoidance during flight in the locust Locusta migratoria , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  R. Chapman,et al.  Tarsal chemoreception in the polyphagous grasshopper Schistocerca americana: behavioural assays, sensilla distributions and electrophysiology , 1990 .

[4]  G Laurent,et al.  Local Control of Leg Movements and Motor Patterns during Grooming in Locusts , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Simmons,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Matheson,et al.  Contralateral coordination and retargeting of limb movements during scratching in the locust , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  G. Varley,et al.  Grasshoppers and Locusts , 1967 .

[8]  M. Burrows,et al.  Receptive fields of motor neurons underlying local tactile reflexes in the locust , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  Hans-Joachim Pflüger,et al.  The Organization of Mechanosensory Neuropiles in Locust Thoracic Ganglia , 1988 .

[10]  W. Jacobs Verhaltensbiologische Studien an Feldheuschrecken , 1953 .

[11]  D. N. Reye,et al.  WING MOVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH COLLISIONAVOIDANCE MANOEUVRES DURING FLIGHT IN THE LOCUST LOCUSTA MIGRATORIA , 1992 .

[12]  G. Laurent,et al.  Elementary Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field Visual Neuron , 1995, Science.

[13]  H. Pflüger The Function of Hair Sensilla on the Locust's Leg: The Role of Tibial Hairs , 1980 .

[14]  L. Chopard La biologie des orthoptères , 1938 .

[15]  R. Hustert,et al.  Motor neuronal receptive fields delimit patterns of motor activity during locomotion of the locust , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Robert THE AUDITORY BEHAVIOUR OF FLYING LOCUSTS , 1989 .