Peer facilitation and how it contributes to the development of a more social view of learning

Abstract Peer learning involves a new role for the students who facilitate the learning of other students. The role of the peer facilitator, which is focused on learning through supporting the learning of other students, would appear to be more social than the traditional role of learner, which is focused on self-learning. This research used repertory grids to investigate whether taking on the more social role of the peer facilitator was related to changes in what students perceived as important in teaching and in learning. Initially, all students saw constructs relating to expectations of the self as more important in learning than those relating to interaction with others. However, in a later repertory grid, the students who acted as peer facilitators saw interaction with others as a more important element of their learning. There was no comparable change in the perceptions of what was important in learning amongst students who were not involved in peer learning or in the perceptions of what was important in teaching amongst all students. These findings are explained with reference to recent developments in the student-learning literature. Their implications are explored both in terms of helping students to develop a greater understanding of their roles as learners and in offering an additional dimension with which to explore students' learning.

[1]  O. Zuber-Skerritt A repertory grid study of staff and students' personal constructs of educational research , 1987 .

[2]  THE APPLICATION OF REPERTORY GRID TECHNIQUE TO COURSE EVALUATION — A PILOT PROJECT , 1991 .

[3]  Marian E Tidswell The Enquiring Tutor: Exploring the Process of Professional Learning , 1995 .

[4]  L. F. Annis The processes and effects of peer tutoring. , 1983 .

[5]  J. Ryder Person perception in post-school education , 1987 .

[6]  F. Marton,et al.  The University of Learning. Beyond Quality and Competence in Higher Education. , 2013 .

[7]  Keith J. Topping,et al.  Effective peer tutoring in further and higher education , 1996 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[9]  David Arendale,et al.  Supplemental Instruction (SI): Review of Research Concerning the Effectiveness of SI from the University of Missouri-Kansas City and Other Institutions from across the United States. , 1997 .

[10]  P. Ashwin Peer Support: Relations between the context, process and outcomes for the students who are supported , 2003 .

[11]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The anatomy of judgement : an investigation into the processes of perception and reasoning. , 1969 .

[12]  M. Goldschmid,et al.  Peer teaching in higher education: A review , 1976 .

[13]  Ronald E. Riggio,et al.  Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Psychological Adjustment: A Component Analysis. , 1989 .

[14]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[15]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching , 1980 .

[16]  D. Hounsell The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[17]  O. Zuber-Skerritt,et al.  Postgraduate Research: Some Changing Personal Constructs in Higher Education , 1986 .

[18]  F. Marton,et al.  Variatio Est Mater Studiorum , 2000 .

[19]  Sinclair Goodlad,et al.  Peer Tutoring: A Guide to Learning by Teaching , 1989 .

[20]  Deanna C. Martin,et al.  Breaking the Attrition Cycle: The Effects of Supplemental Instruction on Undergraduate Performance and Attrition. , 1983 .

[21]  Carolin Kreber,et al.  How University Teaching Award Winners Conceptualise Academic Work: Some further thoughts on the meaning of scholarship , 2000 .

[22]  Neal Whitman,et al.  Peer Teaching: To Teach Is to Learn Twice , 1988 .