Social organization in caged layers: the peck order revisited.

The dominance hierarchy that exists among free ranging chickens is a peck order. Several researchers have attempted to correlate various production parameters of caged layers with dominance rank, with mixed results. Animal welfare groups have expressed increasing concern over the effects of battery cage housing on the behavior of layers, even though several researchers have shown that the incidence of aggressive pecks decreases in these cages. The studies presented here demonstrate that agonistic interactions occur among most pairs of hens housed in pens but do not occur among most pairs of hens housed in cages. Therefore, peck orders could be constructed for hens housed in pens but not for hens housed in cages. Incidence of agonistic interactions is highest in cage-housed hens immediately following housing of the hens; this peak is matched when group membership is mixed. These results suggest that a social system does form among caged hens even if a peck order does not. A single dominant hen in each cage was involved in and won a large majority of the agonistic encounters in the cages. The lack of evidence of dominance relationships between pairs of hens in cages, other than those between a single dominant hen and its cage mates, supports the hypothesis that despotism, not a peck order, was the prevailing social organization among hens housed in high-density cages.

[1]  J. Craig,et al.  Competitive feeding behavior and social status in multiple-hen cages , 1986 .

[2]  J. Craig,et al.  Behaviour and well-being of hens (Gallus domesticus) in alternative housing environments. , 1984 .

[3]  A. Tienhoven,et al.  Relationship between production factors and dominance in White Leghorn hens in a study on social rank and cage design , 1983 .

[4]  D. Cunningham The Effects of Social Rank and Cage Shape on Selected Behavioral and Performance Traits of White Leghorn Layers , 1981 .

[5]  D. Wood‐Gush,et al.  Agonistic behaviour in domestic hens: The influence of housing method and group size , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  B. O. Hughes The absence of a relationship between egg production and dominance in caged laying hens , 1977 .

[7]  J. Craig,et al.  Agonistic Behavior and Egg Production of Caged Layers: Genetic Strain and Group-Size Effects , 1976 .

[8]  J. Craig,et al.  Agonistic behavior of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird , 1975 .

[9]  G. McBride,et al.  Social Forces Determining Spacing and Head Orientation in a Flock of Domestic Hens , 1963, Nature.

[10]  J. Rushen How peck orders of chickens are measured: A critical review , 1984 .

[11]  A. Van tienhoven,et al.  The effects of management program and social rank on behavior and productivity of white leghorn layers in cages. , 1984, Poultry science.

[12]  M. Baxter Ethology in environmental design for animal production , 1983 .

[13]  W. Gross Chicken—Environment Interactions , 1983 .

[14]  J. Craig,et al.  Behavioral and Genetic Adaptation of Laying Hens to High-Density Environments , 1982 .

[15]  J. Craig,et al.  Inhibition of agonistic acts between domestic hens by a dominant third party , 1980 .