Was the Copenhagen Summit doomed from the start? Some insights from Green IS research

At the 2009 Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change, COP15, so many contradictory demands were apparent that it is doubtful whether it produced many useful outcomes. In this paper we question whether it, and summits like it, may be inherently doomed to fall short of expectations. With its experience of the intrinsic contradictions within socio-technical systems, the Information System‟s profession may provide some insights into complex issues such as climate change. IS research has often demonstrated that imposed top-down solutions rarely provide the most promising way to approach highly complex problems. On the other hand, bottom-up emergent processes, though less politically acceptable, may take us in the direction we need to go. This paper reviews and reports Green IS research to make a case for a multifaceted approach to the climate change problem, with the suggestion that the IS experience may inform global approaches to finding bottom-up solutions to climate change.

[1]  Toby Velte,et al.  Green IT: Reduce Your Information System's Environmental Impact While Adding to the Bottom Line , 2008 .

[2]  Geoffrey Dick,et al.  The greening of organisational IT: what makes a difference? , 2010, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  GITAM: A Model for the Adoption of Green IT , 2008 .

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[5]  Jiahua Pan,et al.  China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility , 2008 .

[6]  Lora Oehlberg,et al.  Sustainability Through Meaning Providing Information to Promote Meaningful Products , 2007 .

[7]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[8]  Steve Elliot,et al.  Environmentally Sustainable ICT: Developing Corporate Capabilities and an Industry-Relevant is Research Agenda , 2008, PACIS.

[9]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. , 2002 .

[10]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Takanobu Kosugi,et al.  Internalization of the external costs of global environmental damage in an integrated assessment model , 2009 .

[12]  Sara Ljungblad Everyday Visualization to Support a Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[13]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2009 , 2000 .

[15]  A. J. Brush Did You Leave the Calendar On? Exploring trade-offs between availability and power consumption in the home , 2007 .

[16]  Andrea Caldelli,et al.  Management Information System – A Tool for Corporate Sustainability , 2004 .

[17]  Robert F. Carey,et al.  a heuristics approach to understanding privacy-protecting behaviors in digital social environments , 2009 .

[18]  P. Rao,et al.  Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance , 2005 .

[19]  N. Smith-sebasto,et al.  Designing a likert-type scale to predict environmentally responsible behavior in undergraduate students: A multistep process. , 1995 .

[20]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[21]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  Green IT diffusion: An international comparison , 2009 .

[22]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information systems and ecological sustainability , 2008, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  Perceived E-Readiness Factors in E-Commerce Adoption: An Empirical Investigation in a Developing Country , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[24]  Steve Elliot,et al.  Environmentally Sustainable ICT: A Critical Topic for IS Research? , 2007, PACIS.