Enhanced multi-fidelity model for flight simulation using global exploration and the Kriging method

Using the global exploration and Kriging-based multi-fidelity analysis methods, this study developed a multi-fidelity aerodynamic database for use in the performance analysis of flight vehicles and for use in flight simulations. Athena vortex lattice, a program based on vortex lattice method, was used as the low-fidelity analysis tool in the multi-fidelity analysis method. The in-house high-fidelity AADL-3D code was based on the Navier–Stokes equations. The AADL-3D code was validated by comparing the data and the analysis results of the Onera M-6 wing and NACA TN 3649. The design of experiment method and the Kriging method were applied to integrate low- and high-fidelity analysis results. General data tendencies were established from the low-fidelity analysis results. The high-fidelity analysis results and the Kriging method were used to generate a surrogate model, from which the low-fidelity analysis results were interpolated. To reduce repeated calculations, three design points were simultaneously added for each calculation. The convergence of three design points was avoided by considering only the peak points as additional design points. The reliability of the final surrogate model was determined by applying the leave-one-out cross-validation method and by obtaining the cross-validation root mean square error. Using the multi-fidelity model developed in this study, a multi-fidelity aerodynamic database was constructed for use in the three degrees of freedom flight simulation of flight vehicles.

[1]  Robert M. Hall,et al.  Historical Review of Uncommanded Lateral-Directional Motions at Transonic Conditions , 2004 .

[2]  Jeanine Weekes Schroer,et al.  The Finite String Newsletter Abstracts of Current Literature Glisp User's Manual , 2022 .

[3]  T. Simpson A concept exploration method for product family design , 1998 .

[4]  Yung-Hwan Byun,et al.  Numerical investigation of the shock interaction effect on the lateral jet controlled missile , 2006 .

[5]  L. C. Wrobel Numerical computation of internal and external flows. Volume 2: Computational methods for inviscid and viscous flows , 1992 .

[6]  Jae-Woo Lee,et al.  Integrated Analysis Program Development for Light Aircraft Preliminary Design Stage , 2013 .

[7]  Viktoria Schmitt,et al.  Pressure distributions on the ONERA M6 wing at transonic Mach numbers , 1979 .

[8]  Ken Badcock,et al.  On the generation of flight dynamics aerodynamic tables by computational fluid dynamics , 2011 .

[9]  Jae-Woo Lee,et al.  A modified variable complexity modeling for efficient multidisciplinary aircraft conceptual design , 2015 .

[10]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[11]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  Understanding Abrupt Wing Stall with Computational Fluid Dynamics. , 2005 .

[12]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[13]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[14]  G. Matheron Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[15]  James R. Forsythe,et al.  Calculation of Static and Dynamic Stability Derivatives of the F/A-18E in Abrupt Wing Stall Using RANS and DES , 2006 .