How to Evaluate Phase Differences between Trial Groups in Ongoing Electrophysiological Signals

A growing number of studies endeavor to reveal periodicities in sensory and cognitive functions, by comparing the distribution of ongoing (pre-stimulus) oscillatory phases between two (or more) trial groups reflecting distinct experimental outcomes. A systematic relation between the phase of spontaneous electrophysiological signals, before a stimulus is even presented, and the eventual result of sensory or cognitive processing for that stimulus, would be indicative of an intrinsic periodicity in the underlying neural process. Prior studies of phase-dependent perception have used a variety of analytical methods to measure and evaluate phase differences, and there is currently no established standard practice in this field. The present report intends to remediate this need, by systematically comparing the statistical power of various measures of “phase opposition” between two trial groups, in a number of real and simulated experimental situations. Seven measures were evaluated: one parametric test (circular Watson-Williams test), and three distinct measures of phase opposition (phase bifurcation index, phase opposition sum and phase opposition product) combined with two procedures for non-parametric statistical testing (permutation, or a combination of z-score and permutation). While these are obviously not the only existing or conceivable measures, they have all been used in recent studies. All tested methods performed adequately on a previously published dataset (Busch, Dubois & VanRullen, 2009). On a variety of artificially constructed datasets, no single measure was found to surpass all others, but instead the suitability of each measure was contingent on several experimental factors: the time, frequency and depth of oscillatory phase modulation; the absolute and relative amplitudes of post-stimulus event-related potentials for the two trial groups; the absolute and relative trial numbers for the two groups; and the number of permutations used for non-parametric testing. The concurrent use of two phase opposition measures, the parametric Watson-Williams test and a non-parametric test based on summing inter-trial coherence values for the two trial groups, appears to provide the most satisfactory outcome in all situations tested. Matlab code is provided to automatically compute these phase opposition measures.

[1]  E. Callaway,et al.  Relationship between Reaction Time and Electroencephalographic Alpha Phase , 1960, Science.

[2]  O. Jensen,et al.  Posterior alpha activity is not phase-reset by visual stimuli. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Modulation of Visually Evoked Cortical fMRI Responses by Phase of Ongoing Occipital Alpha Oscillations , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Benedict Shien Wei Ng,et al.  A Precluding But Not Ensuring Role of Entrained Low-Frequency Oscillations for Auditory Perception , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Attention and Temporal Expectations Modulate Power, Not Phase, of Ongoing Alpha Oscillations , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Tom G. Philippi,et al.  Pre- and post-stimulus EEG patterns associated with the touch-induced illusory flash , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The rhythms of predictive coding: pre-stimulus phase modulates the influence of shape perception on luminance judgments , 2016, bioRxiv.

[8]  Felix Blankenburg,et al.  Subjective Rating of Weak Tactile Stimuli Is Parametrically Encoded in Event-Related Potentials , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Rhythmic Fluctuations in Evidence Accumulation during Decision Making in the Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[10]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  A. Keil,et al.  Neural mechanisms of evoked oscillations: Stability and interaction with transient events , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[12]  N. Weisz,et al.  Prestimulus beta power and phase synchrony influence the sound-induced flash illusion. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Education Division Studies in social psychology in World War II , 1949 .

[14]  S. Stouffer Adjustment during army life , 1977 .

[15]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Cortical brain states and corticospinal synchronization influence TMS-evoked motor potentials. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Who wins the race for consciousness? Ask the phase of ongoing ~7Hz oscillations. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[18]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[19]  H. Bastian Sensation and Perception.—I , 1869, Nature.

[20]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Prestimulus Oscillatory Activity in the Alpha Band Predicts Visual Discrimination Ability , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Fries,et al.  Distributed Attention Is Implemented through Theta-Rhythmic Gamma Modulation , 2015, Current Biology.

[22]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Ongoing EEG Phase as a Trial-by-Trial Predictor of Perceptual and Attentional Variability , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[23]  R. VanRullen,et al.  This Is the Rhythm of Your Eyes: The Phase of Ongoing Electroencephalogram Oscillations Modulates Saccadic Reaction Time , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Joachim Lange,et al.  Beta oscillations define discrete perceptual cycles in the somatosensory domain , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  N. Weisz,et al.  On the variability of the McGurk effect: audiovisual integration depends on prestimulus brain states. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Manuel R. Mercier,et al.  Cortical cross-frequency coupling predicts perceptual outcomes , 2013, NeuroImage.

[27]  O. Jensen,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Serve to Protect Working Memory Maintenance against Anticipated Distracters , 2012, Current Biology.

[28]  R. Barry,et al.  Event-related potentials in the auditory oddball as a function of EEG alpha phase at stimulus onset , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[30]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Alexander Thomas Sack,et al.  Increased Stimulus Expectancy Triggers Low-frequency Phase Reset during Restricted Vigilance , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Iain D. Gilchrist,et al.  The contribution of pre-stimulus neural oscillatory activity to spontaneous response time variability , 2015, NeuroImage.

[33]  C. Koch,et al.  Is perception discrete or continuous? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts the amplitude of peri-saccadic mislocalization , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Conscious updating is a rhythmic process , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Matti S. Hämäläinen,et al.  A fast statistical significance test for baseline correction and comparative analysis in phase locking , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[37]  C. Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in neural responses to heartbeats predict visual detection , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Biao Han,et al.  The rhythms of predictive coding? Pre-stimulus phase modulates the influence of shape perception on luminance judgments , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[39]  C. Schroeder,et al.  The Spectrotemporal Filter Mechanism of Auditory Selective Attention , 2013, Neuron.

[40]  J. M. Stroud THE FINE STRUCTURE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TIME , 1967 .

[41]  J. W. Osselton,et al.  The influence of the EEG alpha rhythm on the perception of visual stimuli. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[42]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Retinal and post-retinal contributions to the quantum efficiency of the human eye revealed by electrical neuroimaging , 2012, Front. Psychol..

[43]  E. John,et al.  Perceptual framing and cortical alpha rhythm , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  A. Nobre,et al.  Oscillatory Brain State Predicts Variability in Working Memory , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  S. Dalal,et al.  Prestimulus Oscillatory Phase at 7 Hz Gates Cortical Information Flow and Visual Perception , 2013, Current Biology.

[48]  G. Buzsáki Rhythms of the brain , 2006 .

[49]  Luc H. Arnal,et al.  Delta-Beta Coupled Oscillations Underlie Temporal Prediction Accuracy. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  The best of both worlds: phase-reset of human EEG alpha activity and additive power contribute to ERP generation. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[51]  Li Han,et al.  Improving N1 classification by grouping EEG trials with phases of pre-stimulus EEG oscillations , 2015, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[52]  Lei Ai,et al.  The phase of prestimulus alpha oscillations affects tactile perception. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Alpha Phase Determines Successful Lexical Decision in Noise , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  E. Miller,et al.  Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations , 2009, Neuron.

[55]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Are event-related potential components generated by phase resetting of brain oscillations? A critical discussion , 2007, Neuroscience.

[56]  T. Ergenoğlu,et al.  Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[57]  Evian Gordon,et al.  Eeg alpha phase at stimulus onset significantly affects the amplitude of the P3 ERP component , 1998 .

[58]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[59]  Rufin van Rullen,et al.  Theta Oscillations Modulate Attentional Search Performance Periodically , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  J. Fell,et al.  Rhythmic Working Memory Activation in the Human Hippocampus. , 2015, Cell reports.

[61]  Guofa Shou,et al.  Detection of EEG Spatial–Spectral–Temporal Signatures of Errors: A Comparative Study of ICA-Based and Channel-Based Methods , 2014, Brain Topography.

[62]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[63]  J. Obleser,et al.  Entrained neural oscillations in multiple frequency bands comodulate behavior , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Markus Siegel,et al.  Phase-dependent neuronal coding of objects in short-term memory , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  P. Heil,et al.  Detection of Near-Threshold Sounds is Independent of EEG Phase in Common Frequency Bands , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[66]  R. E. Dustman,et al.  PHASE OF ALPHA BRAIN WAVES, REACTION TIME AND VISUALLY EVOKED POTENTIALS. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[67]  M. Brandt,et al.  The effect of the phase of prestimulus alpha activity on the averaged visual evoked response. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[68]  D M Rice,et al.  Some Evidence in Support of a Relationship between Human Auditory Signal-Detection Performance and the Phase of the Alpha Cycle , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[69]  A R Haig,et al.  EEG alpha phase at stimulus onset significantly affects the amplitude of the P3 ERP component. , 1998, The International journal of neuroscience.

[70]  R. VanRullen Perceptual Cycles , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Rhythmic Influence of Top–Down Perceptual Priors in the Phase of Prestimulus Occipital Alpha Oscillations , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  Kara A. Dyckman,et al.  Pre-Cue Fronto-Occipital Alpha Phase and Distributed Cortical Oscillations Predict Failures of Cognitive Control , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  O. Jensen,et al.  Posterior α activity is not phase-reset by visual stimuli , 2006 .

[74]  K. Paller,et al.  Phase of Spontaneous Slow Oscillations during Sleep Influences Memory-Related Processing of Auditory Cues , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  Rade Kutil,et al.  Alpha phase, temporal attention, and the generation of early event related potentials , 2014, NeuroImage.

[76]  Martin Vinck,et al.  The pairwise phase consistency: A bias-free measure of rhythmic neuronal synchronization , 2010, NeuroImage.

[77]  B. Postle,et al.  Top-down control of the phase of alpha-band oscillations as a mechanism for temporal prediction , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  H. Quastler Information theory in psychology , 1955 .

[79]  Thomas Grunwald,et al.  Neural Bases of Cognitive ERPs: More than Phase Reset , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The Phase of Ongoing Oscillations Mediates the Causal Relation between Brain Excitation and Visual Perception , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[81]  Marieke K. van Vugt,et al.  Fronto-Central Theta Oscillations Are Related to Oscillations in Saccadic Response Times (SRT): An EEG and Behavioral Data Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[82]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Visual discrimination performance is related to decreased alpha amplitude but increased phase locking , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[83]  Marcelo Bussotti Reyes,et al.  Visual Causality Judgments Correlate with the Phase of Alpha Oscillations , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[84]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Theta–gamma coordination between anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex indexes correct attention shifts , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[85]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .