Online Ethnography Studies in Computer Science: A Systematic Mapping

During the last two decades, online environments became rich grounds for ethnographic studies. In the same period, online communities have become a popular and broadly studied research topic. Along with online environments, the growth of online communities brought by the Computer-Mediated Communications created a solid research field for online ethnography studies. Online ethnography methods, such as virtual ethnography and netnography, are widely adopted for qualitative research. However, it is not clear how Computer Science field is using online ethnography for empirical studies. Thus, the main goal of this study is to present how online ethnographic studies have been performed in Computer Science. To accomplish this goal, we carried out a systematic mapping study regarding empirical studies on online environments. Through the analysis of 36 resulted papers, this systematic mapping provides a broad overview of existing online ethnography studies in Computer Science and by identifying how these studies have been performed considering adopted methods, collected and analyzed data, community characteristics, and researcher participation throughout these empirical studies.

[1]  R. Kozinets The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities , 2002 .

[2]  Jose Teixeira,et al.  Patients Using Open-Source Disease Control Software Developed by Other Patients , 2014, WIS.

[3]  Avi Marciano,et al.  Living the VirtuReal: Negotiating Transgender Identity in Cyberspace , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Konstantinos Chorianopoulos,et al.  Avatars' Appearance and Social Behavior in Online Virtual Worlds , 2009, 2009 13th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics.

[5]  Katie J. Ward,et al.  Cyber-ethnography and the emergence of the virtually new community , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Leesa Costello,et al.  Netnography , 2017 .

[7]  Jeremy Provenzola,et al.  Netnography: Evolution, trends, and implications as a fuzzy front end tool , 2013, 2013 Proceedings of PICMET '13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET).

[8]  Allison Druin,et al.  Extreme ethnography: challenges for research in large scale online environments , 2012, iConference '12.

[9]  Wendy Fisher Digital Ink Technology for e-assessment , 2008 .

[10]  R. Kozinets Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online , 2009 .

[11]  Swaleha Peeroo,et al.  Customer engagement manifestations on Facebook pages of Tesco and Walmart , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS).

[12]  Alexandra Broillet,et al.  The competency building process of human computer interaction in game-based teaching: Adding the flexibility of an asynchronous format , 2013, IEEE International Professonal Communication 2013 Conference.

[13]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  Qualitative Research and Hypermedia: Ethnography for the Digital Age , 2005 .

[14]  Marisa Ponti,et al.  Hei Mookie! Where Do I Start? The Role of Artifacts in an Unmanned MOOC , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Member engagement within digitally enabled social network communities: new methodological considerations , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[16]  Melanie Nind,et al.  A review of the academic impact of three methodological innovations: Netnography, child-led research and creative research methods , 2011 .

[17]  Rebecca Strachan,et al.  Moving between virtual and real worlds: Second language learning through Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Games (MMORPGs) , 2011, 2011 3rd Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC).

[18]  Sanna Malinen,et al.  Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  David Sundaram,et al.  How do online social networks support decision making? A pluralistic research agenda , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[20]  Annamari Martinviita,et al.  Online community and the personal diary: Writing to connect at Open Diary , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Christian Sandström,et al.  Value creation and appropriation in social media - the case of fashion bloggers in Sweden , 2013, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[22]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[23]  Murni Mahmud,et al.  Netnography Approach for UX Research , 2016 .

[24]  Sally Burford,et al.  The impact of mobile tablet devices on human information behaviour , 2014, J. Documentation.

[25]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Characterizing the Dynamics of Open User Experience Design: The Cases of Firefox and OpenOffice.org , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Jessica Lingel,et al.  Ethics and dilemmas of online ethnography , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  Simone Bacellar Leal Ferreira,et al.  Accessibility for People with Cerebral Palsy: The use of Blogs as an Agent of Social Inclusion , 2011, DSAI.

[28]  Camilla Vásquez,et al.  Reconceptualising fieldwork in a netnography of an online community of English language teachers , 2013 .

[29]  Amber Marshall Sensemaking in Second Life , 2014 .

[30]  H. Cherif,et al.  Are Brand Communities Influencing Brands through Co-creation? A Cross-National Example of the Brand AXE: In France and in Tunisia , 2013 .

[31]  Anders I. Mørch,et al.  Teaching Interpersonal Problem Solving Skills Using Roleplay in a 3D Virtual World for Special Education: A Case Study in Second Life , 2015, 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[32]  Kai Petersen,et al.  Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update , 2015, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[33]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  Qualitative Research and Hypermedia , 2005 .

[34]  M. Dubosson,et al.  An Internet based distribution strategy of luxury products and services grounded on qualitative Web discourse analysis , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.

[35]  Mattias Jacobsson,et al.  Play, belief and stories about robots: A case study of a pleo blogging community , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[36]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Mobilization of software developers: the free software movement , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[37]  Maria Chiara Di Guardo,et al.  The Challenge and Opportunities of Crowdsourcing Web Communities: An Italian Case Study , 2013 .

[38]  Eric Horster,et al.  Computer-assisted Webnography , 2012 .

[39]  Kishonna Gray Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Xbox Live , 2012 .

[40]  Andrea Baker,et al.  Mick or Keith: blended identity of online rock fans , 2009 .

[41]  Anders Sigfridsson,et al.  On qualitative methodologies and dispersed communities: Reflections on the process of investigating an open source community , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[42]  Philipp Tuertscher,et al.  Intellectual Property Norms in Online Communities: How User-Organized Intellectual Property Regulation Supports Innovation , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Minna Rollins,et al.  Learning by Blogging: Understanding Salespeople's Learning Experiences on Social Media , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[44]  Derya Kulavuz-Onal,et al.  Using Netnography to Explore the Culture of Online Language Teaching Communities. , 2015 .

[45]  Brad McKenna,et al.  Social media in qualitative research: Challenges and recommendations , 2017, Inf. Organ..

[46]  Hsiu-Chia Ko Why are A‐list bloggers continuously popular? , 2012 .

[47]  A. Feenberg,et al.  Involving the Virtual Subject , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[48]  David Rozas Drupal as a Commons-Based Peer Production community: a sociological perspective , 2014, OpenSym.

[49]  Maria Ioannou,et al.  Online trolling: The case of Madeleine McCann , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..