A 2-tuple integrated DEA-based approach for neuromarketing technology evaluation

Neuromarketing, which is an interdisciplinary area, concentrates on evaluating consumers’ cognitive and emotional reactions to different marketing stimuli. In spite of advantages, neuromarketing still requires development and lacks a strong theoretical framework. Techniques that are used in neuromarketing studies have different superiorities and limitations, and thus, there is a need for the evaluation of the relevance of these techniques. The purpose of this study is to introduce a novel integrated approach for the neuromarketing research area.,The proposed approach combines 2-tuple linguistic representation model and data envelopment analysis to obtain the most efficient neuromarketing technique. It is apt to handle information provided by using both linguistic and numerical scales with multiple information sources. Furthermore, it allows managers to deal with heterogeneous information, without loss of information.,The proposed approach indicates that functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is the best performing neuromarketing technology. Recently, fMRI has been widely used in neuromarketing research. In spite of its high cost, its main superiorities are improved spatial and temporal resolutions. On the other hand, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and positron emission tomography (PET) are ranked at the bottom because of their poor resolutions and lower willingness of participants.,This paper proposes a common weight data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based decision model to cope with heterogeneous information collected by the experts to determine the best performing neuromarketing technology. The decision procedure enables the decision-makers to handle the problems of loss of information and multi-granularity by using the fusion of 2-tuple linguistic representation model and fuzzy information. Moreover, a DEA-based common weight model does not require subjective experts’ opinions to weight the evaluation criteria.

[1]  Elif Dogu,et al.  Construction of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Target Marketing Strategy Decisions , 2017, EUSFLAT/IWIFSGN.

[2]  D. Ariely,et al.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Yager New modes of OWA information fusion , 1998 .

[4]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[5]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[6]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  On finding the most BCC-efficient DMU: A new integrated MIP–DEA model , 2012 .

[7]  Chutima Ruanguttamanun,et al.  Neuromarketing: I Put Myself into a fMRI Scanner and Realized that I love Louis Vuitton Ads☆ , 2014 .

[8]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  The most efficient unit without explicit inputs: An extended MILP-DEA model , 2013 .

[9]  Gui-Wu Wei,et al.  Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[10]  Andrés Camilo,et al.  Evaluación de la eficiencia relativa de los sistemas de producción porcícolas del departamento de Cundinamarca, utilizando análisis envolvente de datos (DEA) , 2020 .

[11]  G. Vecchiato,et al.  The issue of multiple univariate comparisons in the context of neuroelectric brain mapping: An application in a neuromarketing experiment , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Maziar Salahi,et al.  An optimistic robust optimization approach to common set of weights in DEA , 2016 .

[13]  A. Memariani,et al.  Reducing weight flexibility in fuzzy DEA , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[14]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Fusion of fuzzy information with considerations for compatibility, partial aggregation, and reinforcement , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[15]  N. Šerić,et al.  Neuromarketing Potential for Tourist Destination Brand Positioning , 2015 .

[16]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[17]  C. Fisher,et al.  Defining Neuromarketing: Practices and Professional Challenges , 2010, Harvard review of psychiatry.

[18]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[19]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  A Common-Weight MCDM Framework for Decision Problems with Multiple Inputs and Outputs , 2007, ICCSA.

[20]  Cheng-Feng Hu,et al.  Efficiency measures in fuzzy data envelopment analysis with common weights , 2016 .

[21]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A new fuzzy additive model for determining the common set of weights in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[22]  José G. Vargas-Hernández,et al.  Analitical approach to neuromarketing as a business strategy , 2013 .

[23]  Ali Payan Common set of weights approach in fuzzy DEA with an application , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[24]  R. Yager A general approach to the fusion of imprecise information , 1997 .

[25]  Christophe Morin,et al.  Neuromarketing: The New Science of Consumer Behavior , 2011 .

[26]  A. A. Foroughi,et al.  A modified common weight model for maximum discrimination in technology selection , 2012 .

[27]  Cheng-Feng Hu,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis with Common Weights in a Fuzzy Environment , 2017, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  Sohrab Kordrostami,et al.  Evaluating the Multi-period Systems Efficiency in the Presence of Fuzzy Data , 2017 .

[29]  Mehdi Toloo An epsilon-free approach for finding the most efficient unit in DEA , 2014 .

[30]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[31]  Jian Ma,et al.  A method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Ronald Paul Hill,et al.  Neuromarketing and Consumer Free Will , 2008 .

[33]  Leon Zurawicki,et al.  Neuromarketing: Exploring the Brain of the Consumer , 2010 .

[34]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[35]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  An Approach for Combining Linguistic and Numerical Information Based on the 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model in Decision-Making , 2000, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[36]  Laura Chamberlain,et al.  What is "neuromarketing"? A discussion and agenda for future research. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[37]  E. E. Karsak *,et al.  Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection , 2005 .

[38]  Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh,et al.  The allocation of sub-decision making units to parallel fuzzy network systems , 2014, Kybernetes.

[39]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  On the Use of EEG or MEG Brain Imaging Tools in Neuromarketing Research , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..