Inhibition of virulent and hypovirulent Cryphonectria parasitica growth in dual culture by fungi commonly isolated from chestnut blight cankers.

Chestnut blight cankers, caused by the fungus Cryphonectria parasitica, are prone to invasion by other microorganisms as the canker ages. This microbial community has the potential to alter canker expansion, which may influence the probability that the canker girdles the infected stem. Hypoviruses infect the pathogen mycelium directly and are known to decrease pathogen virulence (i.e. hypovirulent). These viral infections can slow pathogen growth, decreasing the rate of canker expansion and lowering the probability of girdling. Saprophytic fungi also invade the expanding canker and may antagonize C. parasitica leading to reduced pathogen growth. The combined effects of fungal antagonism and a hypovirulent pathogen could work in combination to reduce the probability of girdling the infected stem. We assessed the ability of different fungal taxa, isolated from low severity cankers, to inhibit the growth of virulent and hypovirulent forms of C. parasitica in dual culture tests on two cultural media. Percent growth inhibition of virulent C. parasitica by potentially antagonistic fungi ranged from 2 % to 34 %, while inhibition of hypovirulent C. parasitica ranged from 18 % to 54 %. Only one isolate, identified as Umbelopsis isabellina (UmbelopsisWS) inhibited the virulent form of the pathogen more than the hypovirulent form. All three Trichoderma isolates caused the greatest growth inhibition of virulent C. parasitica, but they, like all other fungal isolates tested, inhibited the hypovirulent form of the pathogen more than the virulent form. These results suggest that commonly occurring fungi in chestnut blight cankers, including Trichoderma, may inhibit the hypovirulent C. parasitica more than virulent C. parasitica. Thus, the presence of other fungi in cankers may not enhance the effect of hypovirulent C. parasitica to delay cankers from girdling a stem but instead intensify canker development.

[1]  C. S. Thomas,et al.  Chestnut blight and recovering American chestnut trees in Michigan , 1983 .

[2]  Ronald M. Atlas,et al.  Handbook of microbiological media , 1993 .

[3]  G. J. Griffin,et al.  Developmental histopathology of cankers incited by hypovirulent and virulent isolates of Endothia parasitica on susceptible and resistant chestnut trees , 1984 .

[4]  M. Milgroom,et al.  Incidence and Diversity of Double-Stranded RNAs Occurring in the Chestnut Blight Fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica, in China and Japan. , 1998, Phytopathology.

[5]  G. Boland,et al.  Assessment of hypovirulent isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica for potential in biological control of chestnut blight , 1997 .

[6]  D. Linder-Basso,et al.  Genome analysis of Cryphonectria hypovirus 4, the most common hypovirus species in North America. , 2005, Virology.

[7]  Y. Tian,et al.  A North American hypovirulent isolate of the chestnut blight fungus with European isolate-related dsRNA. , 1992, The Journal of general virology.

[8]  A. Arnold,et al.  Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents of Theobroma cacao pathogens , 2008 .

[9]  W. L. MacDonald,et al.  Effect of dsRNA associated with isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica from the Central Appalachians and their relatedness to other dsRNAs from North America and Europe , 1994 .

[10]  A. Jarosz,et al.  Hyperparasites influence population structure of the chestnut blight pathogen, Cryphonectria parasitica. , 2013, Phytopathology.

[11]  N. Luisi,et al.  Antagonistic activity of endophytic fungi towards Diplodia corticola assessed by in vitro and in planta tests , 2007, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[12]  C. Kubicek,et al.  Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting identifies subgroups of Trichoderma viride and other Trichoderma sp. capable of chestnut blight biocontrol. , 1995, FEMS microbiology letters.

[13]  G. J. Griffin,et al.  Survival of american chestnut trees: evaluation of blight resistance and virulence in Endothia parasitica , 1983 .

[14]  P. Cortesi,et al.  Biological control of chestnut blight with hypovirulence: a critical analysis. , 2004, Annual review of phytopathology.

[15]  D. Nuss,et al.  Hypoviruses and chestnut blight: exploiting viruses to understand and modulate fungal pathogenesis. , 2001, Annual review of genetics.

[16]  W. Macdonald,et al.  Fungi associated with hypovirulent cankers of differing ages on American chestnut , 2014 .

[17]  N. Suzuki,et al.  Viruses of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. , 2004, Advances in virus research.

[18]  D. Tilman,et al.  Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Walter,et al.  Targeted selection of antagonistic microorganisms for control of Botrytis cinerea of strawberry in New Zealand , 2009, Australasian Plant Pathology.

[20]  S. Anagnostakis.  Hypovirulence, Vegetative Incompatibility, and the Growth of Cankers of Chestnut Blight , 1981 .

[21]  Gary E. Harman,et al.  Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[22]  F. Paillet,et al.  Replacement of native oak and hickory tree species by the introduced American chestnut (Castanea dentata) in southwestern Wisconsin , 1989 .

[23]  R. Jaynes,et al.  Pathogenicity and canker control by mixtures of hypovirulent strains of Endothia parasitica in American chestnut. , 1980 .

[24]  C. Smart,et al.  Cryphonectria hypovirus 3, a virus species in the family hypoviridae with a single open reading frame. , 1999, Virology.

[25]  S. Anagnostakis,et al.  Hypovirulence conversion in Endothia parasitica. , 1979 .

[26]  Y. Katircioğlu,et al.  Biological control of chestnut canker, caused by Cryphonectria parasitica, by antagonistic organisms and hypovirulent isolates , 2011 .

[27]  D. Nuss,et al.  Engineering super mycovirus donor strains of chestnut blight fungus by systematic disruption of multilocus vic genes , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  S. Prospero,et al.  Saprophytic Activity and Sporulation of Cryphonectria parasitica on Dead Chestnut Wood in Forests with Naturally Established Hypovirulence. , 2006, Phytopathology.

[29]  M. S. Mount,et al.  BIOCONTROL OF THE CHESTNUT BLIGHT FUNGUS CRYPHONECTRIA PARASITICA , 1996 .

[30]  K. Sotirovski,et al.  Informative value of canker morphology on the presence or absence of virus infection in chestnut blight cankers , 2013 .

[31]  Yir-Chung Liu,et al.  Recombination and migration of Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 as inferred from gene genealogies and the coalescent. , 2004, Genetics.

[32]  A. Jarosz,et al.  Demography of American chestnut populations: effects of a pathogen and a hyperparasite , 2004 .