Effects of Infills in the Seismic Performance of an RC Factory Building in Pakistan

Infilled reinforced concrete (IRC) frames are a very common construction typology, not only in developing countries such as Pakistan but also in southern Europe and Western countries, due to their ease of construction and less technical skills required for the construction. Their performance during past earthquakes has been in some cases satisfactory and in other cases inadequate. Significant effort has been made among researchers to improve such performance, but few have highlighted the influence of construction materials used in the infill walls. In some building codes, infills are still considered as non-structural elements, both in the design of new buildings and, sometimes, in the assessment of existing buildings. This is mainly due to some difficulties in modeling their mechanical behavior and also the large variety of typologies, which are difficult to categorize. Some building codes, for example, Eurocode, already address the influence of infill walls in design, but there is still a lack of homogeneity among different codes. For example, the Pakistan building code (PBC) does not address infills, despite being a common construction technique in the country. Past earthquake survey records show that construction materials and infill types significantly affect the seismic response of buildings, thus highlighting the importance of investigating such parameters. This is the object of this work, where a numerical model for infill walls is introduced, which aims at predicting their failure mode, as a function of some essential parameters, such as the friction coefficient between mortar and brick surface and mortar strength, usually disregarded in previous models. A comprehensive case study is presented of a three-story IRC frame located in the city of Mirpur, Pakistan, hit by an earthquake of magnitude 5.9 on 24 September 2019. The results obtained from the numerical model show good agreement with the damage patterns observed in situ, thus highlighting the importance of correctly modeling the infill walls when seismically designing or assessing Pakistani buildings that make use of this technology.

[1]  L. Cavaleri,et al.  Macroelement Model for In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Responses of Masonry Infills in Frame Structures , 2018 .

[2]  Aníbal Costa,et al.  Simplified Macro-Model for Infill Masonry Panels , 2010 .

[3]  M. H. Al Hanoun,et al.  Macromodeling of in- and out-of-plane behavior of unreinforced masonry infill walls , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[4]  B. Smith.  Methods for predicting the lateral stiffness and strength of multi-storey infilled frames , 1967 .

[5]  Honglan Huang,et al.  Classification of in-plane failure modes for reinforced concrete frames with infills using machine learning , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[6]  Gabriele Bertagnoli,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Direct Definition of Stress–Strain Laws for Fiber-Section-Based Macromodeling of Infilled Frames , 2018, Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

[7]  G. Verderame,et al.  Experimental investigation of the influence of slenderness ratio and of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction on the out-of-plane strength of URM infill walls , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[8]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Double-Leaf Infill Masonry Walls Cyclic In-Plane Behaviour: Experimental and Numerical Investigation , 2018 .

[9]  Xiaojie Zhou,et al.  Influence of Infill Wall Configuration on Failure Modes of RC Frames , 2018, Shock and Vibration.

[10]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Prediction of the earthquake response of a three- storey infilled RC structure , 2018 .

[11]  L. Cavaleri,et al.  Definition of a fiber macro-model for nonlinear analysis of infilled frames , 2017 .

[12]  A. Ahmed,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of confined masonry structures by macro-modeling approach , 2020 .

[13]  B. Zengin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF THE BRICKS USED IN MASONRY WALLS ON CHARACTERISTIC PROPERTIES , 2017 .

[14]  R. P. Nanda,et al.  In-plane shear strengthening of brick masonry panel with geogrid reinforcement embedded in bed and bed-head joints mortar , 2021 .

[15]  P. Lourenço,et al.  In-plane behavior of cavity masonry infills and strengthening with textile reinforced mortar , 2018 .

[16]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[17]  N. Ahmad,et al.  Seismic performance of RC frames retrofitted with haunch technique , 2018 .

[18]  Henry V. Burton,et al.  A database of test results from steel and reinforced concrete infilled frame experiments , 2020 .

[19]  Honglan Huang,et al.  Development and Utilization of a Database of Infilled Frame Experiments for Numerical Modeling , 2020 .

[20]  Syed Azmat Ali Shah,et al.  INFLUENCE OF BRICK MASONRY INFILLED WALL ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME , 2020 .

[21]  C. Butenweg,et al.  Experimental results of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills under combined quasi-static in-plane and out-of-plane seismic loading , 2019, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[22]  D. Bournas,et al.  Out-of-Plane Strengthening of Masonry-Infilled RC Frames with Textile-Reinforced Mortar Jackets , 2019, Journal of Composites for Construction.

[23]  Marco Di Ludovico,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability for RC Infilled Frames: Simplified Evaluation for As-Built and Retrofitted Building Typologies , 2018 .

[24]  Camillo Nuti,et al.  Experimental tests and global modeling of masonry infilled frames , 2015 .

[25]  André Furtado,et al.  Recent Findings and Open Issues concerning the Seismic Behaviour of Masonry Infill Walls in RC Buildings , 2020 .

[26]  Daniela Addessi,et al.  Multiscale analysis of out-of-plane masonry elements using different structural models at macro and microscale , 2021 .

[27]  F. Minelli,et al.  Retrofitting RC infills by a glass fiber mesh reinforced overlay and steel dowels: experimental and numerical study , 2020 .