Neural responses to relative speed in the primary visual cortex of rhesus monkey

Relative motion information, especially relative speed between different input patterns, is required for solving many complex tasks of the visual system, such as depth perception by motion parallax and motion-induced figure/ground segmentation. However, little is known about the neural substrate for processing relative speed information. To explore the neural mechanisms for relative speed, we recorded single-unit responses to relative motion in the primary visual cortex (area V1) of rhesus monkeys while presenting sets of random-dot arrays moving at different speeds. We found that most V1 neurons were sensitive to the existence of a discontinuity in speed, that is, they showed higher responses when relative motion was presented compared to homogenous field motion. Seventy percent of the neurons in our sample responded predominantly to relative rather than to absolute speed. Relative speed tuning curves were similar at different center–surround velocity combinations. These relative motion-sensitive neurons in macaque area V1 probably contribute to figure/ground segmentation and motion discontinuity detection.

[1]  Theodore H. Bullock,et al.  Unit Responses in the Frog's Tectum to Moving and Nonmoving Visual Stimuli , 1963, Science.

[2]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  G. Mandl Localization of visual patterns by neurons in cerebral cortex of the cat. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  B Bridgeman,et al.  Visual Receptive Fields Sensitive to Absolute and Relative Motion during Tracking , 1972, Science.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Inhibition of visual responses of single units in the cat superior colliculus by the introduction of a second visual stimulus. , 1973, Brain research.

[7]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis , 1974, Perception.

[8]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[9]  G. Poggio,et al.  Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. Mackay,et al.  Modulatory influences of moving textured backgrounds on responsiveness of simple cells in feline striate cortex , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. , 1983, Science.

[13]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Mandl Responses of visual cells in cat superior colliculus to relative pattern movement , 1985, Vision Research.

[15]  William B. Thompson,et al.  Analysis of Accretion and Deletion at Boundaries in Dynamic Scenes , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  H. Ono,et al.  Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  G. Orban,et al.  The suppressive influence of moving textured backgrounds on responses of cat striate neurons to moving bars. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  G. Orban,et al.  Influence of a moving textured background on direction selectivity of cat striate neurons. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  G. Orban,et al.  Modulation by a moving texture of cat area 18 neuron responses to moving bars. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  R A Andersen,et al.  The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Selectivity for relative motion in the monkey superior colliculus. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Henk Spekreijse,et al.  Contour from motion processing occurs in primary visual cortex , 1993, Nature.

[24]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. III. Modeling , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  The direction of retinal motion facilitates binocular steropsis , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Neural correlates of boundary perception , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Andersen,et al.  Center–Surround Antagonism Based on Disparity in Primate Area MT , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth , 1998, Nature.

[32]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[33]  S. Kastner,et al.  Neuronal responses to orientation and motion contrast in cat striate cortex , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  Pieter R Roelfsema,et al.  The role of primary visual cortex (V1) in visual awareness , 2000, Vision Research.

[35]  R. Born Center-surround interactions in the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  An Cao,et al.  Behavioral assessment of motion parallax and stereopsis as depth cues in rhesus monkeys , 2002, Vision Research.

[37]  A. T. Smith,et al.  On the sensitivity of complex cells in feline striate cortex to relative motion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  P. L. Scilley,et al.  Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  R. A. Andersen,et al.  VI responses to transparent and nontransparent motions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  R. Mason,et al.  Responsiveness of cells in the cat's superior colliculus to textured visual stimuli , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  B. J. Frost,et al.  Double-opponent-process mechanism underlying RF-structure of directionally specific cells of cat lateral suprasylvian visual area , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  D. Mackay,et al.  Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.