The spanish equality law and the gender balance in the evaluation committees: an opportunity for women’s promotion in higher education

Despite advances in gender policy and equality laws in the twenty-first century, women are still a minority in the full professor category in Europe. Some measures establish gender quotas to balance gatekeeper positions, which will supposedly pave the way to make women’s integration into senior higher education positions easier. In Spain, Organic Act 3/20071 of 22 March on effective equality between women and men launched progressive norms governing gender issues, and the Spanish Science and Technology Act (2011) incorporated measures to promote effective equality in academic institutions. This paper evaluates how Spanish evaluation agencies’ compliance with implementing gender balance has affected the composition of evaluation committees and its impact on the advancement of women in science. Findings reveal some positive figures on women’s representation in recent decades, even though gender-balanced committees do not show any clear evidence of causing this effect. There seems to be no correlation between gender-balanced committees and women’s success rates, suggesting intermediate variables affect women’s low participation in competitive submissions. It explores several factors concerning two agencies’ evaluation procedures, such as formality and transparency, direct/multiple gatekeeping processes, the influence of epistemic cultures, cohorts and confidence of female candidates.

[1]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Linda A. Krefting Intertwined Discourses of Merit and Gender: Evidence from Academic Employment in the USA , 2003 .

[3]  C. Muntaner,et al.  How to Resist Austerity: the Case of the Gender Budgeting Strategy in Andalusia , 2017 .

[4]  A. M. G. Ramos,et al.  Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response , 2017 .

[5]  Manuel Bagues,et al.  Does Gender Matter for Academic Promotion? Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  Y. Benschop,et al.  Sisyphus' Sisters: Can Gender Mainstreaming Escape the Genderedness of Organizations? , 2006 .

[7]  R. Steinpreis,et al.  The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study , 1999 .

[8]  Yvonne Benschop,et al.  Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs , 2012 .

[9]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals , 1985 .

[10]  K. Knorr Cetina Epistemic Cultures , 1999 .

[11]  Monica Gaughan,et al.  Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[12]  H. Ibarra Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[13]  A. M. G. Ramos,et al.  Do men and women perform academic work differently , 2015 .

[14]  B. Campbell Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[15]  Estonia Dr.biol,et al.  The gender challenge in research funding-assessing the European national scenes Sweden , 2008 .

[16]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  H. Marsh,et al.  Improving the Peer-review Process for Grant Applications , 2022 .

[18]  R. Jackson,et al.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.

[19]  M. Ruesta La evaluación de las políticas de género en España , 2004 .

[20]  M.L.M. Brouns,et al.  The gendered nature of assessment procedures in scientific research funding. The case of the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research , 2000 .

[21]  R. Sealy Changing perceptions of meritocracy in senior women's careers , 2010 .

[22]  Christopher Lee,et al.  Peer review of interdisciplinary scientific papers , 2006 .

[23]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences , 2009, 0911.1306.

[24]  Patricia Lewis,et al.  Revealing and concealing gender : issues of visibility in organizations , 2010 .

[25]  Patricia A. Lewis,et al.  Kanter Revisited: Gender, Power and (In)Visibility , 2012 .

[26]  A. Margulis Impact of Gender , 2011 .

[27]  N. Zinovyeva,et al.  Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter? , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  O. Benítez The Fragility of Gender Equality Policies in Spain , 2016 .

[29]  Carole Leathwood,et al.  Research policy and academic performativity: compliance, contestation and complicity , 2013 .

[30]  Jaap Scheerens,et al.  Career Competencies for the Modern Career , 2006 .

[31]  Patricia Lewis,et al.  Revealing and Concealing Gender , 2010 .

[32]  L. Bornmann,et al.  Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches , 2009 .

[33]  M. Brink,et al.  Does Excellence have a Gender? A National Research Study on Recruitment and Selection Procedures for Professorial Appointments in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[34]  Yvonne Benschop,et al.  Transparency in Academic Recruitment: A Problematic Tool for Gender Equality? , 2010 .

[35]  P. O’Connor,et al.  Excellence in university academic staff evaluation: a problematic reality? , 2016 .

[36]  Ted Mouw Social Capital and Finding a Job: Do Contacts Matter? , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[37]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Persistent nepotism in peer-review , 2008, Scientometrics.

[39]  S. Acker Teachers, Gender and Careers. , 1989 .

[40]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Gender Dynamics in Science and Technology :: From the "Leaky Pipeline" to the "Vanish Box" , 2011 .

[41]  Y. Benschop,et al.  Crumbling Ivory Towers: Academic Organizing and its Gender Effects , 2003 .

[42]  T. Rees,et al.  The Gendered Construction of Scientific Excellence , 2011 .

[43]  Y. Benschop,et al.  Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment , 2014 .