The spanish equality law and the gender balance in the evaluation committees: an opportunity for women’s promotion in higher education
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. M. G. Ramos | Olga Pons Peregort | Ana Mª Gonzalez Ramos | Ester Conesa Carpintero | Marta Tura Solvas
[1] C. Wennerås,et al. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.
[2] Linda A. Krefting. Intertwined Discourses of Merit and Gender: Evidence from Academic Employment in the USA , 2003 .
[3] C. Muntaner,et al. How to Resist Austerity: the Case of the Gender Budgeting Strategy in Andalusia , 2017 .
[4] A. M. G. Ramos,et al. Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response , 2017 .
[5] Manuel Bagues,et al. Does Gender Matter for Academic Promotion? Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[6] Y. Benschop,et al. Sisyphus' Sisters: Can Gender Mainstreaming Escape the Genderedness of Organizations? , 2006 .
[7] R. Steinpreis,et al. The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study , 1999 .
[8] Yvonne Benschop,et al. Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs , 2012 .
[9] Alan L. Porter,et al. Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals , 1985 .
[10] K. Knorr Cetina. Epistemic Cultures , 1999 .
[11] Monica Gaughan,et al. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..
[12] H. Ibarra. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .
[13] A. M. G. Ramos,et al. Do men and women perform academic work differently , 2015 .
[14] B. Campbell. Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .
[15] Estonia Dr.biol,et al. The gender challenge in research funding-assessing the European national scenes Sweden , 2008 .
[16] S. Ceci,et al. Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] H. Marsh,et al. Improving the Peer-review Process for Grant Applications , 2022 .
[18] R. Jackson,et al. The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.
[19] M. Ruesta. La evaluación de las políticas de género en España , 2004 .
[20] M.L.M. Brouns,et al. The gendered nature of assessment procedures in scientific research funding. The case of the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research , 2000 .
[21] R. Sealy. Changing perceptions of meritocracy in senior women's careers , 2010 .
[22] Christopher Lee,et al. Peer review of interdisciplinary scientific papers , 2006 .
[23] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences , 2009, 0911.1306.
[24] Patricia Lewis,et al. Revealing and concealing gender : issues of visibility in organizations , 2010 .
[25] Patricia A. Lewis,et al. Kanter Revisited: Gender, Power and (In)Visibility , 2012 .
[26] A. Margulis. Impact of Gender , 2011 .
[27] N. Zinovyeva,et al. Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter? , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[28] O. Benítez. The Fragility of Gender Equality Policies in Spain , 2016 .
[29] Carole Leathwood,et al. Research policy and academic performativity: compliance, contestation and complicity , 2013 .
[30] Jaap Scheerens,et al. Career Competencies for the Modern Career , 2006 .
[31] Patricia Lewis,et al. Revealing and Concealing Gender , 2010 .
[32] L. Bornmann,et al. Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches , 2009 .
[33] M. Brink,et al. Does Excellence have a Gender? A National Research Study on Recruitment and Selection Procedures for Professorial Appointments in the Netherlands , 2006 .
[34] Yvonne Benschop,et al. Transparency in Academic Recruitment: A Problematic Tool for Gender Equality? , 2010 .
[35] P. O’Connor,et al. Excellence in university academic staff evaluation: a problematic reality? , 2016 .
[36] Ted Mouw. Social Capital and Finding a Job: Do Contacts Matter? , 2003, American Sociological Review.
[37] M. Graham,et al. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[38] Ulf Sandström,et al. Persistent nepotism in peer-review , 2008, Scientometrics.
[39] S. Acker. Teachers, Gender and Careers. , 1989 .
[40] Henry Etzkowitz,et al. Gender Dynamics in Science and Technology :: From the "Leaky Pipeline" to the "Vanish Box" , 2011 .
[41] Y. Benschop,et al. Crumbling Ivory Towers: Academic Organizing and its Gender Effects , 2003 .
[42] T. Rees,et al. The Gendered Construction of Scientific Excellence , 2011 .
[43] Y. Benschop,et al. Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment , 2014 .