Effect of ROI size on the performance of an information-theoretic CAD system in mammography: multi-size fusion analysis

Featureless, knowledge-based CAD systems are an attractive alternative to feature-based CAD because they require no to minimal image preprocessing. Such systems compare images directly using the raw image pixel values rather than relying on low-level image features. Specifically, information-theoretic (IT) measures such as mutual information (MI) have been shown to be an effective, featureless, similarity measure for image comparisons. MI captures the statistical relationship between the gray level values of corresponding image pixels. In a CAD system developed at our laboratory, the above concept has been applied for location-specific detection of mammographic masses. The system is designed to operate on a fixed size region of interest (ROI) extracted around a suspicious mammographic location. Since mass sizes vary substantially, there is a potential drawback. When two ROIs are compared, it is unclear how much the parenchymal background contributes in the calculated MI. This uncertainty could deteriorate CAD performance in the extreme cases, namely when a small mass is present in the ROI or when a large mass extends beyond the fixed size ROI. The present study evaluates the effect of ROI size on the overall CAD performance and proposes multisize analysis for possible improvement. Based on two datasets of ROIs extracted from DDSM mammograms, there was a statistically significant decline of the CAD performance as the ROI size increased. The best size ranged between 512x512 and 256x256 pixels. Multisize fusion analysis using a linear model achieved further improvement in CAD performance for both datasets.

[1]  Rene Vargas-Voracek,et al.  Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information. , 2003, Medical physics.

[2]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  David M Catarious,et al.  Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system. , 2004, Medical physics.

[4]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  A mammographic mass CAD system incorporating features from shape, fractal, and channelized Hotelling observer measurements: preliminary results , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  C. Floyd,et al.  Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  P Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  N. Obuchowski Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[9]  Swatee Singh,et al.  Information-theoretic CAD system in mammography: entropy-based indexing for computational efficiency and robust performance. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.