One approach to the classification of business knowledge diagrams: Practical view

Diagrams are an effective and popular tool for visual knowledge structuring. Managers also often use them to acquire and transfer business knowledge. There are many currently available diagrams or visual modeling languages for managerial needs, unfortunately the choice between them is frequently error-prone and inconsistent. This situation raises the next questions. What diagrams/ visual modeling languages are the most suitable for the specific type of business content? What domain-specific diagrams are the most suitable for the visualization of the particular elements of organizational ontology? In order to provide the answers, the paper suggests light-weight specification of diagrams and knowledge content types, which is based on the competency questions and ontology design patterns. The proposed approach provides the classification of qualitative business diagrams.

[1]  J. Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching , 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visual representations in knowledge management: framework and cases , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  Dimitris Karagiannis,et al.  Metamodelling Platforms , 2002, EC-Web.

[4]  Tatiana Gavrilova,et al.  Work in Progress: A Visual Specification of Knowledge Bases , 1998, IEA/AIE.

[5]  Neff Walker,et al.  A classification of visual representations , 1994, CACM.

[6]  Yuri Engelhardt,et al.  A Meta-Taxonomy for Diagram Research , 2002, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning.

[7]  Jörn-Axel Meyer,et al.  The acceptance of visual information in management , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Communicating with diagrams: how intuitive and cross-cultural are business graphics? , 2008 .

[9]  Mari Carmen,et al.  NeOn Methodology for Building Ontology Networks: Ontology Specification , 2008 .

[10]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Visual Knowledge Engineering , 1990, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[11]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[12]  Farhad Arbab,et al.  Towards a language for coherent enterprise architecture descriptions , 2003, Seventh IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  A. Maule,et al.  Causal Cognitive Mapping in the Organizational Strategy Field: A Comparison of Alternative Elicitation Procedures , 2004 .

[14]  Martin Hepp,et al.  Organisational Ontology Framework for Semantic Business Process Management , 2009, BIS.

[15]  Michaël Petit,et al.  Towards a Unified Business Strategy Language: A Meta-model of Strategy Maps , 2010, PoEM.

[16]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Ontology Design Patterns , 2005 .

[17]  Marten van Sinderen,et al.  Ontology-Based Evaluation and Design of Domain-Specific Visual Modeling Languages , 2006 .

[18]  Bernhard Rumpe,et al.  Modeling Languages: Syntax, Semantics and All That Stuff, Part I: The Basic Stuff , 2000 .

[19]  Akrivi Katifori,et al.  Ontology visualization methods—a survey , 2007, CSUR.

[20]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Towards a periodic table of visualization methods of management , 2007 .