Quantitative ultrasound backscatter parameters in the human cervix

Quantitative ultrasound has been investigated as a tool for monitoring cervical changes that might result in preterm birth. Backscatter parameters, specifically attenuation and the backscattered power loss (BSPL), appear to be two important parameters. Sources of potential variability such as the angle of the beam interrogating the cervix, the region within the cervix, the number of previous births, and the state of ripening, have not been systematically examined, but could contribute to bias and variance in parameter estimates. Results presented here show that attenuation was affected by angle of interrogation, region in the cervix, parity, and ripened state. BSPL in the nonpregnant cervix was affected only by cervical region.

[1]  L. X. Yao,et al.  Backscatter Coefficient Measurements Using a Reference Phantom to Extract Depth-Dependent Instrumentation Factors , 1990, Ultrasonic imaging.

[2]  C. Spong,et al.  Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  T. Hall,et al.  Beyond cervical length: emerging technologies for assessing the pregnant cervix. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Yassin Labyed,et al.  Estimate of the attenuation coefficient using a clinical array transducer for the detection of cervical ripening in human pregnancy. , 2011, Ultrasonics.

[5]  T J Hall,et al.  Identifying acoustic scattering sources in normal renal parenchyma in vivo by varying arterial and ureteral pressures. , 1992, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Anisotropy of the ultrasonic attenuation in soft tissues: measurements in vitro. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Mala Mahendroo,et al.  Cervical remodeling in term and preterm birth: insights from an animal model. , 2012, Reproduction.

[8]  Ana Pilar Betran,et al.  The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[9]  C. R. Hill,et al.  Attenuation of ultrasound in skeletal muscle. , 1979, Ultrasonics.

[10]  T. Hall,et al.  Estimation of shear wave speed in the human uterine cervix , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  Goutam Ghoshal,et al.  Comparison of Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter Estimates in Layered Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms among Three Clinical Scanners , 2012, Ultrasonic imaging.

[12]  H. Ermert,et al.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth , 2008, The Lancet.

[14]  W D O'Brien,et al.  Anisotropy of ultrasonic propagation and scattering properties in fresh rat skeletal muscle in vitro. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Timothy J Hall,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Assessment of Cervical Microstructure , 2010, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  Timothy J. Hall,et al.  Task-Oriented Comparison of Power Spectral Density Estimation Methods for Quantifying Acoustic Attenuation in Diagnostic Ultrasound Using a Reference Phantom Method , 2013, Ultrasonic imaging (Print).