Protracted Radiation Exposure and Cancer Mortality in the Techa River Cohort

Abstract Krestinina, L. Y., Preston, D. L., Ostroumova, E. V., Degteva, M. O., Ron, E., Vyushkova, O. V., Startsev, N. V., Kossenko, M. M. and Akleyev, A. V. Protracted Radiation Exposure and Cancer Mortality in the Extended Techa River Cohort. Radiat. Res. 164, 602–611 (2005). In the 1950s many thousands of people living in rural villages on the Techa River received protracted internal and external exposures to ionizing radiation from the release of radioactive material from the Mayak plutonium production complex. The Extended Techa River Cohort includes 29,873 people born before 1950 who lived near the river sometime between 1950 and 1960. Vital status and cause of death are known for most cohort members. Individualized dose estimates have been computed using the Techa River Dosimetry System 2000. The analyses provide strong evidence of long-term carcinogenic effects of protracted low-dose-rate exposures; however, the risk estimates must be interpreted with caution because of uncertainties in the dose estimates. We provide preliminary radiation risk estimates for cancer mortality based on 1,842 solid cancer deaths (excluding bone cancer) and 61 deaths from leukemia. The excess relative risk per gray for solid cancer is 0.92 (95% CI 0.2; 1.7), while those for leukemia, including and excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia, are 4.2 (CI 95% 1.2; 13) and 6.5 (CI 95% 1.8; 24), respectively. It is estimated that about 2.5% of the solid cancer deaths and 63% of the leukemia deaths are associated with the radiation exposure.

[1]  P. Hubert,et al.  Risk analysis of leukaemia incidence among people living along the Techa River: a nested case-control study , 2006, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[2]  S H Moolgavkar,et al.  A stochastic two-stage model for cancer risk assessment. I. The hazard function and the probability of tumor. , 1988, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  M. Kossenko.  Cancer mortality among Techa River residents and their offspring. , 1996, Health physics.

[4]  M. Kossenko.  Cancer mortality in the exposed population of the Techa River area. , 1996, World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales.

[5]  D. Pierce,et al.  Age-time patterns of cancer to be anticipated from exposure to general mutagens. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[6]  D. Preston,et al.  Lung Cancer in Mayak Workers , 2004, Radiation research.

[7]  D. Richardson,et al.  Radiation and mortality of workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: positive associations for doses received at older ages. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  T. Thomas,et al.  The Techa River Cohort: Study Design and Follow-up Methods , 2005, Radiation research.

[9]  T. Thomas,et al.  Studies on the extended Techa river cohort: cancer risk estimation , 2002, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[10]  Charles Mw,et al.  Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: Solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997. , 2003 .

[11]  G. Gulis,et al.  Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  M. I. Vorobiova,et al.  On an evaluation of external dose values in the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS) 2000 , 2003, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[13]  Y. Mokrov.  External radiation exposure of residents living close to the Mayak facility: main sources, dose estimates, and comparison with earlier assessments , 2004, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[14]  D. Richardson,et al.  Greater sensitivity to ionizing radiation at older age: follow-up of workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory through 1990. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[15]  B A Napier,et al.  DOSE RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM FOR THE EXPOSED POPULATION LIVING ALONG THE TECHA RIVER , 2000, Health physics.

[16]  D. Preston,et al.  Issues in the comparison of risk estimates for the population in the Techa River region and atomic bomb survivors. , 1997, Radiation research.

[17]  Kossenko Mm.  Cancer mortality in the exposed population of the Techa River area. , 1996 .

[18]  D A Pierce,et al.  Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2000, Radiation research.

[19]  岩崎 民子.  SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[20]  B. Napier,et al.  Preliminary uncertainty analysis for the doses estimated using the Techa River dosimetry system--2000. , 2001, Health physics.

[21]  M. Degteva,et al.  Cancer mortality and radiation risk evaluation for the Techa River population. , 1994, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  B. Napier,et al.  Reconstruction of radionuclide contamination of the Techa River caused by liquid waste discharge from radiochemical production at the Mayak Production Association. , 2000, Health physics.

[23]  N A Koshurnikova,et al.  Cancer Mortality Risk among Workers at the Mayak Nuclear Complex , 2003, Radiation research.

[24]  B. Napier,et al.  The Techa River dosimetry system: methods for the reconstruction of internal dose. , 2000, Health physics.

[25]  D A Pierce,et al.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990. , 1996, Radiation research.

[26]  M. I. Vorobiova,et al.  General approach to dose reconstruction in the population exposed as a result of the release of radioactive wastes into the Techa River. , 1994, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  A. Akleyev,et al.  Environmental and medical effects of nuclear weapon production in the southern Urals. , 1994, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  M. Balonov,et al.  REPORT FROM THE TECHA RIVER DOSIMETRY REVIEW WORKSHOP HELD ON 8–10 DECEMBER 2003 AT THE STATE RESEARCH CENTRE INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS, MOSCOW, RUSSIA , 2006, Health physics.

[29]  M. I. Vorobiova,et al.  Review of historical monitoring data on Techa River contamination. , 1999, Health physics.

[30]  Y. Mokrov.  A reconsideration of the external dose assessment for the Techa river population , 2002, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[31]  M. Degteva,et al.  Simple model for the reconstruction of radionuclide concentrations and radiation exposures along the Techa River. , 1999, Health physics.

[32]  W F Heidenreich,et al.  Some Properties of the Hazard Function of the Two‐Mutation Clonal Expansion Model , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Yukiko Shimizu,et al.  Effect of Recent Changes in Atomic Bomb Survivor Dosimetry on Cancer Mortality Risk Estimates , 2004, Radiation research.

[34]  Y. Mokrov.  Dose assessment for the Metlino and Muslyumovo populations who lived along the Techa river from 1949 to 1954 , 2004, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[35]  D. Pierce,et al.  Age-time distribution of cancer risks to be expected from acute or chronic exposures to general mutagens. , 2000, Radiation research.

[36]  M. I. Vorobiova,et al.  ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE AND FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION-BASED INVESTIGATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL DOSES FOR PERSONS LIVING AT METLINO IN THE UPPER REACHES OF THE TECHA RIVER , 2005, Health physics.