Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task

It is difficult to match two images of the same unfamiliar face, even under good conditions. Here, we show that there are large individual differences on unfamiliar face matching. Initially, we tried to predict these using tests of visual short-term memory, cognitive style, and perceptual speed. Moderate correlations were produced by various components of these tests. In three other experiments, we found very strong correlations between face matching and inverted face matching on the same test. Finally, we examined potential associations between familiar and unfamiliar face processing. Strong correlations were found between familiar and unfamiliar face processing, but only when the familiar faces were inverted. We conclude that unfamiliar faces are processed for identity in a qualitatively different way than are familiar faces.

[1]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  S. Messick,et al.  COGNITIVE STYLES AND MEMORY FOR FACES. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  Jerome Kagan,et al.  Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children. , 1965 .

[4]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[5]  H. A. Witkin.  Psychological differentiation; studies of development , 1974 .

[6]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  A perspective on the recognition of other-race faces , 1976 .

[7]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Depth of processing and anxiety in facial recognition. , 1979, British journal of psychology.

[8]  Ruth B. Ekstrom.  Cognitive factors: Their identification and replication. , 1979 .

[9]  Eugene Winograd,et al.  Memory for faces: A social learning analysis , 1979 .

[10]  A D Baddeley,et al.  Individual differences and memory for faces, pictures, and words , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[11]  M. Courtois,et al.  Target and distractor typicality in facial recognition , 1981 .

[12]  H S Levin,et al.  Prosopagnosia: adouble dissociation between the recognition offamiliar andunfamiliar faces , 1982 .

[13]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[14]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features , 1985, Perception.

[16]  R. Flin,et al.  Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[17]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[18]  V. Bruce.  Influences of Familiarity on the Processing of Faces , 1986, Perception.

[19]  T. Valentine.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[20]  J. R. Vokey,et al.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[21]  A. Young,et al.  Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  V. Bruce,et al.  What's Distinctive about a Distinctive Face? , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[25]  J. Feldman,et al.  Prediction of IQ and specific cognitive abilities at 11 years from infancy measures. , 1995 .

[26]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[27]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  G. Pike,et al.  When Seeing should not be Believing: Photographs, Credit Cards and Fraud , 1997 .

[29]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[30]  J T Enns,et al.  Separate influences of orientation and lighting in the inverted-face effect , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Familiarity, Target Set and False Positives in Face Recognition , 1997 .

[32]  Jonathan W. Schooler,et al.  Whom do words hurt? Individual differences in susceptibility to verbal overshadowing , 1998 .

[33]  J R Moeller,et al.  Individual differences in PET activation of object perception and attention systems predict face matching accuracy. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[34]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[35]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[36]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  From Pixels to People: A Model of Familiar Face Recognition , 1999 .

[37]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[38]  B. Gelder,et al.  Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[41]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Matching the faces of robbers captured on video , 2001 .

[42]  G D Pearlson,et al.  Determinants of Benton Facial Recognition Test performance in normal adults. , 2001, Neuropsychology.

[43]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[44]  C. Liu,et al.  Face recognition is robust with incongruent image resolution: relationship to security video images. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[45]  J. Feldman,et al.  Infant visual recognition memory: independent contributions of speed and attention. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[46]  P. Bennett,et al.  Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.