A new approach to exploring language emergence as boundedly optimal control in the face of environmental and cognitive constraints

Computational experiments have been used extensively to study language emergence by simulating the evolution of language over generations of interacting agents. Much of this work has focused on understanding the mechanisms of how language might have evolved. We propose a complementary approach helpful in understanding why specific properties of language might have emerged as an adaptive response to joint pressures from the environment and constraints on an agent’s cognitive architecture. The approach suggests that linguistic systems can be described as boundedly optimal policies in multi-agent dynamic control problems defined by specific environments, agent computational structures, and task-oriented (vs. communication oriented) rewards. We illustrate the approach with a set of computational experiments.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Language and Mind , 1973 .

[2]  W. Strange Evolution of language. , 1984, JAMA.

[3]  S. Pinker,et al.  Natural language and natural selection , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Luc Steels,et al.  Synthesising the origins of language and meaning using co-evolution, self-organisation and level formation , 1998 .

[5]  M A Nowak,et al.  An error limit for the evolution of language , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  M A Nowak,et al.  The evolution of language. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  The evolution of syntactic communication , 2000, Nature.

[8]  P. Niyogi,et al.  Computational and evolutionary aspects of language , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[10]  Tao Gong,et al.  Coevolution of lexicon and syntax from a simulation perspective , 2005, Complex..

[11]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[12]  S. Pinker,et al.  The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.

[13]  S. Pinker,et al.  The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) , 2005, Cognition.

[14]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications , 2005, Cognition.

[15]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[16]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[17]  Joachim De Beule THE EMERGENCE OF COMPOSITIONALITY, HIERARCHY AND RECURSION IN PEER-TO-PEER INTERACTIONS , 2008 .

[18]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper , 2009 .

[19]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Evolution of Human Language: Some simple evo devo theses: how true might they be for language? , 2010 .

[20]  Viviane Déprez,et al.  The evolution of human language: Biolinguistic perspectives , 2010 .