MRI-conditional pacemakers: current perspectives

Use of both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pacing devices has undergone remarkable growth in recent years, and it is estimated that the majority of patients with pacemakers will need an MRI during their lifetime. These investigations will generally be denied due to the potentially dangerous interactions between cardiac devices and the magnetic fields and radio frequency energy used in MRI. Despite the increasing reports of uneventful scanning in selected patients with conventional pacemakers under close surveillance, MRI is still contraindicated in those circumstances and cannot be considered a routine procedure. These limitations prompted a series of modifications in generator and lead engineering, designed to minimize interactions that could compromise device function and patient safety. The resulting MRI-conditional pacemakers were first introduced in 2008 and the clinical experience gathered so far supports their safety in the MRI environment if certain conditions are fulfilled. With this technology, new questions and controversies arise regarding patient selection, clinical impact, and cost-effectiveness. In this review, we discuss the potential risks of MRI in patients with electronic cardiac devices and present updated information regarding the features of MRI-conditional pacemakers and the clinical experience with currently available models. Finally, we provide some guidance on how to scan patients who have these devices and discuss future directions in the field.

[1]  Daniel R. Frisch,et al.  Trends in permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States from 1993 to 2009: increasing complexity of patients and procedures. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  R. Russo,et al.  Determining the risks of magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  F. Romeo,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a new magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pacing system: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional dual-chamber implant outcomes. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[4]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Radiofrequency heating effects around resonant lengths of wire in MRI. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Giovanni Calcagnini,et al.  In vitro investigation of pacemaker lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging: Role of implant geometry , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Robert Fair,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Chung,et al.  Complication Rates Associated With Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacements and Upgrade Procedures: Results From the REPLACE Registry , 2010, Circulation.

[8]  Daniel B Ennis,et al.  Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker‐attached leads at 1.5 tesla MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Werner Jung,et al.  Safe magnetic resonance image scanning of the pacemaker patient: current technologies and future directions. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  Patrick M Colletti,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of "MR Conditional" designs , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[11]  M. Mollerus,et al.  Cardiac Biomarkers in Patients with Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators Undergoing an MRI Scan , 2008, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  J. Gimbel The safety of MRI scanning of pacemakers and ICDs: what are the critical elements of safe scanning? Ask me again at 10,000. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  Saman Nazarian,et al.  Effects of external electrical and magnetic fields on pacemakers and defibrillators: from engineering principles to clinical practice. , 2013, Circulation.

[14]  B. Demirkan,et al.  High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[15]  M. Santini,et al.  Evaluating MRI‐Compatible Pacemakers: Patient Data Now Paves the Way to Widespread Clinical Application? , 2013, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  Simple design changes to wires to substantially reduce MRI-induced heating at 1.5 T: implications for implanted leads. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  E. Kanal,et al.  MR-conditional pacemakers. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J. Gimbel Unexpected asystole during 3T magnetic resonance imaging of a pacemaker-dependent patient with a 'modern' pacemaker. , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  Paul A Bottomley,et al.  Designing passive MRI-safe implantable conducting leads with electrodes. , 2010, Medical physics.

[20]  E. Martin,et al.  MRI in patients with cardiac devices , 2007, Current cardiology reports.

[21]  Robert E. Graham,et al.  MRI of patients with cardiac pacemakers: a review of the medical literature. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Jason T. Su,et al.  Safety and Imaging Quality of MRI in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients with Pacemakers , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[23]  H. Halperin,et al.  Clinical Utility and Safety of a Protocol for Noncardiac and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillators at 1.5 Tesla , 2006, Circulation.

[24]  M. Ladd,et al.  Measuring RF‐induced currents inside implants: Impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  P. Neužil,et al.  Pacemaker and ICD lead extraction with electrosurgical dissection sheaths and standard transvenous extraction systems: results of a randomized trial. , 2007, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[26]  Harold Litt,et al.  Strategy for Safe Performance of Extrathoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla in the Presence of Cardiac Pacemakers in Non–Pacemaker-Dependent Patients: A Prospective Study With 115 Examinations , 2006, Circulation.

[27]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverters/defibrillators at 1.5 T. , 2011, American heart journal.

[28]  Ó. Cano,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T in patients with cardiac rhythm devices. , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[29]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  MRI Conditional Pacemakers , 2014 .

[30]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Pacemaker Reed Switch Behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Units: Are Reed Switches Always Closed in Strong Magnetic Fields? , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[31]  H. Mond,et al.  The 11th World Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators: Calendar Year 2009–A World Society of Arrhythmia's Project , 2011, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[32]  J Gieseke,et al.  MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. , 2000, Radiology.

[33]  H. Litt,et al.  Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? , 2006, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[34]  O. Faris,et al.  Government Viewpoint: U.S. Food & Drug Administration: Pacemakers, ICDs and MRI , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[35]  Ron Kalin,et al.  Current Clinical Issues for MRI Scanning of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Patients , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[36]  Robert J Russo,et al.  Determining the risks of clinically indicated nonthoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design of the MagnaSafe Registry. , 2013, American heart journal.

[37]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Safety of brain 3-T MR imaging with transmit-receive head coil in patients with cardiac pacemakers: pilot prospective study with 51 examinations. , 2008, Radiology.

[38]  E. Kanal,et al.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design , 2008, Trials.

[39]  J. Stockman,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of a Protocol for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Implanted Cardiac Devices , 2013 .

[40]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  ECG Artifacts During Intraoperative High-Field MRI Scanning , 2004, Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology.

[41]  S. Priori,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[42]  Henry R. Halperin,et al.  Modern Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Systems Can Be Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe: In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Safety and Function at 1.5 T , 2004, Circulation.

[43]  D. Bluemke,et al.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2007, Circulation.

[44]  MICHAEL MOLLERUS,et al.  Ectopy in Patients with Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators Undergoing an MRI Scan , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[45]  Gerhard Steinbeck,et al.  Complete Loss of ICD Programmability After Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[46]  H. Mayr,et al.  Monocenter feasibility study of the MRI compatibility of the Evia pacemaker in combination with Safio S pacemaker lead , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[47]  Saman Nazarian,et al.  How to perform magnetic resonance imaging on patients with implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[48]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, European heart journal.

[49]  Mamas Mamas,et al.  Not All Pacemakers Are Created Equal: MRI Conditional Pacemaker and Lead Technology , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[50]  S. Swiryn,et al.  Characterization of the magnetohydrodynamic effect as a signal from the surface electrocardiogram during cardiac magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, 2006 Computers in Cardiology.

[51]  F. Shellock,et al.  MR imaging in patients with pacemakers and other devices: engineering the future. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[52]  S. Globits,et al.  Clinical routine implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker system designed for safe use with MRI , 2011, Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie.

[53]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[54]  P Boesiger,et al.  Force and Torque Effects of a 1.5‐Tesla MRI Scanner on Cardiac Pacemakers and ICDs , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[55]  M. Mollerus,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without specific absorption rate restrictions. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[56]  David L. Hayes,et al.  Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[57]  Terry O Woods,et al.  MR labeling information for implants and devices: explanation of terminology. , 2009, Radiology.

[58]  J Rod Gimbel,et al.  Unexpected pacing inhibition upon exposure to the 3T static magnetic field prior to imaging acquisition: what is the mechanism? , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[59]  S Suave Lobodzinski Recent innovations in the development of magnetic resonance imaging conditional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. , 2012, Cardiology journal.

[60]  F. Shellock,et al.  MR in patients with pacemakers and ICDs: Defining the issues. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[61]  E. Kanal,et al.  ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013 , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[62]  H. Schild,et al.  Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: increased safety for pacemaker patients? , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[63]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: a collaborative clinical approach , 2011, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[64]  Saman Nazarian,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable devices. , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[65]  Ronald D Berger,et al.  Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment. , 2008, Heart rhythm.