When Terror Hits Home: Identity Fused Americans Who Saw Boston Bombing Victims as “Family” Provided Aid

When tragedy strikes a group, only some group members characteristically rush to the aid of the victims. What motivates the altruism of these exceptional individuals? Here, we provide one set of answers based on data collected before and shortly after the 15 April 2013, Boston Marathon bombings. The results of three studies indicated that Americans who were strongly “fused” with their country were especially inclined to provide various forms of support to the bombing victims. Moreover, the degree to which participants reported perceiving fellow Americans as psychological kin statistically mediated links between fusion and pro-group outcomes. Together, these findings shed new light on relationships between personal and group identity, cognitive representations of group members, and personally costly, pro-group actions.

[1]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes What Makes a Group worth Dying For? Identity Fusion Fosters Perception of Familial Ties, Promoting Self-sacrifice , 2022 .

[2]  G. Downey.  Comments in response to Harvey Whitehouse and Jonathan A. Lanman, 'The ties that bind us: ritual, fusion, and identification' , 2014 .

[3]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Contemplating the ultimate sacrifice: identity fusion channels pro-group affect, cognition, and moral decision making. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Henry G. Gole.  What It Is like to Go to War , 2013 .

[5]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[6]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion. , 2012, Psychological review.

[7]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[8]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[9]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Kinship on the Kibbutz: coresidence duration predicts altruism, personal sexual aversions and moral attitudes among communally reared peers , 2012 .

[10]  W. Swann,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology the Group among Identity-fused Persons Rejected and Excluded Forevermore, but Even More Devoted : Irrevocable Ostracism Intensifies Loyalty to on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[11]  D. Fessler,et al.  Karo Batak Cousin Marriage, Cosocialization, and the Westermarck Hypothesis , 2011, Current Anthropology.

[12]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  On the nature of identity fusion: insights into the construct and a new measure. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Harding.  Talking to the Enemy:: Violent Extremism, Sacred Values and What It Means to Be Human by Scott Atran , 2011 .

[14]  W. Swann,et al.  Identity fusion and self-sacrifice: arousal as a catalyst of pro-group fighting, dying, and helping behavior. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis.  Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace , 2010, XRDS.

[16]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Dying and Killing for One’s Group , 2010, Psychological science.

[17]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[18]  David G. Rand,et al.  The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.

[19]  D. Penn,et al.  Kin recognition: an overview of conceptual issues, mechanisms and evolutionary theory , 2010 .

[20]  A. Damasio.  Self comes to mind : constructing the conscious brain , 2010 .

[21]  Scott Atran,et al.  What Motivates Participation in Violent Political Action , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  W. Swann,et al.  Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Mark Van Vugt,et al.  Psychology of Human Kin Recognition: Heuristic Cues, Erroneous Inferences, and Their Implications , 2008 .

[24]  Mark Schaller,et al.  Is friendship akin to kinship? , 2007, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[25]  J. Henrich,et al.  Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation , 2007 .

[26]  D. Iacobucci,et al.  A Meditation on Mediation: Evidence that Structural Equations Models Perform Better than Regressions , 2007 .

[27]  N. Allen,et al.  Assessing dissimilarity relations under missing data conditions: evidence from computer simulations. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Martin H. Levinson.  Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution , 2006 .

[29]  Tuck Wah Leong,et al.  Randomness as a resource for design , 2006, DIS '06.

[30]  Martin A. Conway,et al.  Memory and the self , 2005 .

[31]  L. DeBruine,et al.  Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  M. Schaller,et al.  Does attitude similarity serve as a heuristic cue for kinship? Evidence of an implicit cognitive association , 2005 .

[33]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[34]  L. DeBruine,et al.  Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same–sex faces more than other–sex faces , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  T. Burke,et al.  Experimental evidence that kin discrimination in the Seychelles warbler is based on association and not on genetic relatedness , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  H. Whitehouse.  Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission , 2004 .

[37]  M. Yuki,et al.  Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. , 2003 .

[38]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[39]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Overlap of Self, Ingroup, and Outgroup: Pictorial Measures of Self-Categorization , 2002 .

[40]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Ingroup Identification as the Inclusion of Ingroup in the Self , 2001 .

[41]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Overlapping Mental Representations of Self and In-Group: Reaction Time Evidence and Its Relationship with Explicit Measures of Group Identification☆ , 2000 .

[42]  D. McAdams,et al.  Personal narratives and the life story. , 1999 .

[43]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[44]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  The "remembered" self. , 1994 .

[45]  Geoff Berridge,et al.  Talking to the Enemy , 1994 .

[46]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[47]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[48]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[49]  J. Bruner.  Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[50]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: moral imperatives or personal decisions? , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[52]  K. G. Bailey.  Psychological kinship: Implications for the helping professions. , 1988 .

[53]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization, interpersonal attraction and group formation , 1983 .

[54]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[55]  R. Lewontin.  ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[56]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[57]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[59]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[60]  F. T. McAndrew.  War , 1870, Nature.