KineAssist: Design and Development of a Robotic Overground Gait and Balance Therapy Device

Abstract Background and Purpose: Balance and mobility training consists of activities that carry a high risk for falling. The purpose of this article is to describe a novel robotic system for allowing challenging, yet safe, balance and mobility training in persons at high risk for falls. Method: With no initial preconceptions of what device we would build, a user-needs analysis led us to focus on increasing the level of challenge to a patient’s ability to maintain balance during gait training and also on maintaining direct involvement of a physical therapist (rather than attempting robotic replacement). The KineAssist® is a robotic device for gait and balance training that has emerged from a unique design process of a start-up product of a small company and a team of therapists, engineers, mechanical design experts, and rehabilitation scientists. Results: The KineAssist® provides partial body weight support and postural control on the torso; allows many axes of motion of the trunk and pelvis; leaves the patient’s legs accessible to a physical therapist’s manipulation during walking; follows a patient’s walking motions overground in forward, rotation, and sidestepping directions; and catches an individual who loses balance and begins to fall. Discussion and Conclusion: Design and development of the KineAssist® proceeded more rapidly in the context of a small company than would have been possible in most institutional research contexts. A prototype KineAssist® has been constructed and has received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classification and institutional review board clearance for initial human studies. The acceptance of KineAssist® will ultimately depend on improved patient outcomes, the use of this new tool by therapists, the ease of use of the system, and the recognition of the unique value it brings to therapeutic recovery.

[1]  D. Ma,et al.  Relationships among walking performance, postural stability, and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. , 1987 .

[2]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  W. J. Beek,et al.  Hemiplegic gait: a kinematic analysis using walking speed as a basis. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  E. Protas,et al.  A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  E. Roth,et al.  Hemiplegic gait. Relationships between walking speed and other temporal parameters. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Perry,et al.  Factors Affecting Balance and Ambulation Following Stroke , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Correlation of knee extensor muscle torque and spasticity with gait speed in patients with stroke. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  B. Dobkin An Overview of Treadmill Locomotor Training with Partial Body Weight Support: A Neurophysiologically Sound Approach Whose Time Has Come for Randomized Clinical Trials , 1999 .

[9]  Y Laufer,et al.  The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation: a randomized study. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  S. Harkema,et al.  Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[11]  V. Reggie Edgerton,et al.  Does Motor Learning Occur in the Spinal Cord? , 1997 .

[12]  B. Sjölund,et al.  Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[13]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[14]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics , 1996 .

[15]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Cobot architecture , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  A. Forster,et al.  Incidence and consequences offalls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry , 1995, BMJ.

[18]  S B Sepic,et al.  Relationships among walking performance, postural stability, and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. , 1987, American journal of physical medicine.

[19]  N. Hogan,et al.  Overview of clinical trials with MIT-MANUS: a robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation facility. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[20]  H Barbeau,et al.  The effects of parallel bars, body weight support and speed on the modulation of the locomotor pattern of spastic paretic gait. A preliminary communication , 1994, Paraplegia.

[21]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Plastic ankle-foot orthoses: evaluation of function. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  M. Reding,et al.  Comparison of Partial Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Gait Training Versus Aggressive Bracing Assisted Walking Post Stroke , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Nature, reliability, and predictive value of muscle performance measures in patients with hemiparesis following stroke. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  B. Knowlton,et al.  Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Design of robot assistance for arm movement therapy following stroke , 2001, Adv. Robotics.

[26]  H. Barbeau,et al.  A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. , 1998, Stroke.

[27]  S. Hesse,et al.  Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[28]  V R Edgerton,et al.  Full weight-bearing hindlimb standing following stand training in the adult spinal cat. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Speed-Dependent Treadmill Training in Ambulatory Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2002, Stroke.

[31]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  L Gransberg,et al.  Influences of muscle stretch reflexes on voluntary, velocity-controlled movements in spastic paraparesis. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  K H Mauritz,et al.  Restoration of gait by combined treadmill training and multichannel electrical stimulation in non-ambulatory hemiparetic patients. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[34]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[36]  V R Edgerton,et al.  Use-dependent plasticity in spinal stepping and standing. , 1997, Advances in neurology.

[37]  R. J. Gregor,et al.  Effects of training on the recovery of full-weight-bearing stepping in the adult spinal cat , 1986, Experimental Neurology.

[38]  H Barbeau,et al.  The Effects of Body Weight Support on the Locomotor Pattern of Spastic Paretic Patients , 1989, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[39]  M W Rogers,et al.  Kinetic analysis of dynamic transitions in stance support accompanying voluntary leg flexion movements in hemiparetic adults. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[40]  J Perry,et al.  The Mechanics of Walking in Hemiplegia , 1969, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design of a series elastic- and Bowden cable-based actuation system for use as torque-actuator in exoskeleton-type training , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[42]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat , 1987, Brain Research.

[43]  C. Gowland,et al.  Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[44]  Suggested Readings,et al.  Suggested readings , 2001, Journal of Primary Prevention.

[45]  M. Maležič,et al.  Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. , 1995, Stroke.

[46]  B. Bobath Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment , 1978 .

[47]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A robotic tool for studying locomotor adaptation and rehabilitation , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[48]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. , 1995, Stroke.

[49]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Description and application of a system for locomotor rehabilitation , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.