Small businesses as a research subject: Some reflections on knowledge of small businesses and its effects on economic theory

Most economists agree in their view of small and medium-sized enterprises, or small businesses (SMEs), as a marginal scientific subject. They may go so far as to ignore them, either because they think these economic units do not lend themselves to conventional economic studies — studies which, for instance, take into account the “sacred cow” theory of economies of scale — or because they see them as being not really different from big businesses.However, at least a few economists have recognized, first, the many characteristics differentiating SMEs from big firms, and second, their increasing importance in terms of numbers and job creation within economies. Among these few, Schumpeter was one of the first to show the importance of entrepreneurs and SMEs as the main variable of change in an economy. Simon and Lucas also explained the difference between small and big firms through the differing abilities required by managers to run them. Penrose looked at the question from another point of view by highlighting the interstices taken up by SMEs to fulfil needs that cannot be fulfilled by bigger units. Critics of the theory of economies of scale showed that such economies may be offset by a number of diseconomies, thus justifying the efficiency of many SMEs. More recently, Mills and Schumann suggested that SMEs compensate for their lack of economies of scale by their production flexibility, particularly in today's turbulent economy.The limits of traditional economic theory are clearly demonstrated by the fact that it does not take account of all these theories, concepts and ideas. It thus neglects a number of important economic phenomena, including the persistence and current expansion of SMEs. Consideration of such phenomena may lead to the development of a new economic theory based on the concepts of instability and contingency, together with the behaviour of entrepreneurs and small firms, thus tending to contradict, in particular, the concept of equilibrium in conventional economic theory.

[1]  N. Kaldor The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics , 1972 .

[2]  Robert E. Lucas,et al.  On the Size Distribution of Business Firms , 1978 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Size Distribution of Business Firms , 1958 .

[4]  Walter Y. Oi,et al.  HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS AND THE ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION , 1983 .

[5]  W. Kickert,et al.  The Magic WordFlexibility , 1984 .

[6]  C. Sabel Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy , 1993 .

[7]  R. Reix La flexibilité de l'entreprise , 1979 .

[8]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[9]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[10]  L. Hébert,et al.  LE RYTHME DE PÉNÉTRATION DES NOUVELLES TECHNOLOGIES DANS LES PME MANUFACTURIÈRES QUÉBÉCOISES , 1986 .

[11]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[12]  David E. Mills,et al.  Industry Structure with Fluctuating Demand , 1985 .

[13]  P. Julien,et al.  The small business: as a transaction space , 1990 .

[14]  Jonathan Zeitlin,et al.  Reversing industrial decline? : industrial structure and policy in Britain and her competitors , 1989 .

[15]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  The Development and Use of Machine Tools in Historical Perspective , 1984 .

[16]  B. Gold Changing Perspectives on Size, Scale, and Returns: An Interpretive Survey , 1981 .

[17]  Pierre-André Julien,et al.  Towards the formalization of ‘small is beautiful’: Societal effectiveness versus economic efficiency , 1983 .

[18]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in large and small firms , 1987 .

[19]  T. Scitovsky,et al.  Two Concepts of External Economies , 1954, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  R. Cyert,et al.  Theory of the Firm , 1966 .

[21]  Jean-Luc Gaffard,et al.  La dynamique économique de l'innovation , 1988 .

[22]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  The evolution of manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: An international study , 1989 .

[23]  T. Veblen The Theory of the Leisure Class , 1901 .

[24]  G. Stigler Production and Distribution in the Short Run , 1939, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  P. Julien,et al.  Vers une typologie multicritère des PME , 1990 .

[26]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[27]  Thorstein Veblen,et al.  The theory of the leisure class : an economic study of institutions , 1953 .

[28]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[29]  Henry Mintzberg Mintzberg on management : inside our strange world of organizations , 1991 .

[30]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Composition of R and D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output , 1981 .

[31]  G. Shackle The years of high theory , 1967 .

[32]  P. Julien The Entrepreneur and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[33]  R. Rothwell Small firms, innovation and industrial change , 1989 .

[34]  Fritz Machlup,et al.  THEORIES OF THE FIRM: MARGINALIST, BEHAVIORAL, MANAGERIAL , 1978 .