Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation: The Prospects of Achieving Corporate Accountability Through Transparency

This paper argues that social reporting can be an important form of New Governance regulation to achieve stakeholder accountability. Current social reporting practices, however, fall short of achieving stakeholder accountability and actually may work against it. By examining the success and failures of other transparency programs in the United States, we can identify key factors for ensuring the success of social reporting over the long term. These factors include increasing the benefits-to-costs ratios of both the users of the information and the disclosers, and recognizing the importance of the involvement of third-party intermediaries.

[1]  H. Boerstler,et al.  Governmental Incentives for Corporate Self Regulation , 1998 .

[2]  D. Owen,et al.  The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? , 2000 .

[3]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism , 1998 .

[4]  Thomas W. Dunfee,et al.  The Kasky-Nike Threat to Corporate Social Reporting: Implementing a Standard of Optimal Truthful Disclosure as a Solution , 2007 .

[5]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions , 1997 .

[6]  Darren Sinclair,et al.  Self‐Regulation Versus Command and Control? Beyond False Dichotomies , 1997 .

[7]  Neil Gunningham,et al.  Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance , 2002, Law & Social Inquiry.

[8]  Werner Antweiler,et al.  Incentives for pollution abatement: Regulation, regulatory threats, and non‐governmental pressures , 2003 .

[9]  T. Wilthagen,et al.  Reflexive Labour Law:Studies in Industrial Relations and Employment Regulation , 1994 .

[10]  Brandon L. Garrett,et al.  Experimentalist Equal Protection , 2004 .

[11]  B. Karkkainen "New Governance" in legal thought and in the world: Some splitting as antidote to overzealous lumping , 2004 .

[12]  D. O'Rourke,et al.  Reinventing Environmental Regulation from the Grassroots Up: Explaining and Expanding the Success of the Toxics Release Inventory , 2000, Environmental management.

[13]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Does the Market Value Environmental Performance? , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[14]  Reginald Hooghiemstra Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting , 2000 .

[15]  C. Deegan,et al.  An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory , 2002 .

[16]  Paul J. Bolster,et al.  The role of market forces in EPA enforcement activity , 1996 .

[17]  Orly Lobel The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought , 2005 .

[18]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Toxics Release Information: A Policy Tool for Environmental Protection , 1998 .

[19]  G. O'Donovan,et al.  Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory , 2002 .

[20]  Carol A. Adams,et al.  The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap , 2004 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[22]  Peter J. May,et al.  Compliance Motivations: Affirmative and Negative Bases , 2004 .

[23]  M. Latham. Democracy and Infomediaries , 2001 .

[24]  Joseph V. Rees,et al.  Industry Self‐Regulation: An Institutional Perspective , 1997 .

[25]  C. Coglianese,et al.  Management-Based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals , 2003 .

[26]  David Owen,et al.  QUESTIONING THE ROLE OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN SOCIAL AND ETHICAL ACCOUNTING, AUDITING AND REPORTING , 2001 .

[27]  Dave Renton,et al.  Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance , 2005 .

[28]  C. Deegan,et al.  Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?: An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority , 1996 .

[29]  Mark Stephan,et al.  Environmental Information Disclosure Programs: They Work, but Why? , 2002 .

[30]  Susan P. Sturm Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach , 2001 .

[31]  David N. Weil,et al.  The Political Economy of Transparency: What Makes Disclosure Policies Sustainable? , 2004 .

[32]  Tracey A. Swift,et al.  Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders , 2001 .

[33]  Bradley C. Karkkainen,et al.  Information as Environmental Regulation: TRI and Performance Benchmarking, Precursor to a New Paradigm? , 2000, Environmental Law.

[34]  R. Gray Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: what (if anything) have we learnt? , 2001 .

[35]  R. Gray,et al.  External transparency or internal capture? The role of third‐party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports1 , 2000 .

[36]  J. Hamilton Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data , 1995 .

[37]  David Hess,et al.  Social Reporting: A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness , 1999 .

[38]  David Hess Regulating Corporate Social Performance: A New Look at Social Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting , 2001, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[39]  C. Sunstein Paradoxes of the Regulatory State , 1990 .

[40]  C. Deegan Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation , 2002 .

[41]  C. Parker The Open Corporation: Effective Self-regulation and Democracy , 2002 .

[42]  W. Laufer Corporate Liability, Risk Shifting, and the Paradox of Compliance , 1999 .

[43]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[44]  T. Wilthagen,et al.  Moving beyond command-and-control: reflexivity in the regulation of occupational safety and health and the environment. , 1997 .

[45]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  After Backyard Environmentalism , 2000 .

[46]  Empowering Stakeholders: Limits on Collaboration as the Basis for Flexible Regulation , 1999 .

[47]  C. Deegan,et al.  Firms' Disclosure Reactions to Major Social Incidents: Australian Evidence , 2000 .

[48]  W M Sage Regulating through information: disclosure laws and American health care. , 1999, Columbia law review.

[49]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate , 1992 .

[50]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure , 1997 .

[51]  J. Cummings Engaging stakeholders in corporate accountability programmes: A cross‐sectoral analysis of UK and transnational experience , 2001 .

[52]  L. Bui,et al.  Regulation and Capitalization of Environmental Amenities: Evidence from the Toxic Release Inventory in Massachusetts , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.