Control Comparison for the Coordinate Transformation of an Asymmetric Dual Three Phase Synchronous Motor in Healthy and Single-Phase Open Fault States

The coordinate transformation method of asymmetric dual three phase synchronous motor (ADTP-SM) is a Double dq transform using two dq-axes and a vector space decomposition (VSD) model method using the orthogonality of ADTP-SM. There are several studies comparing the two methods in a healthy state, but few in a single-phase open fault state. In the healthy, when the VSD model is applied, different harmonic orders of the phase current are projected onto the dq and xy-axes (the axis for controlling harmonics of the phase current), and the two-axes are orthogonal, so it can be controlled stably. In the single-phase open fault state, the same current control logic as in the healthy situation is applied. When applying the Double dq transform, the dq-axis of the fault set fluctuates, and it affects the healthy set, so it cannot be controlled stably. When applying the VSD model, if both the dq-axis and the xy-axis are controlled, the two coordinate systems do not have orthogonality and cannot be stably controlled, due to mutual interference. However, if only the dq-axis is controlled, it can be controlled stably because there is no Cartesian coordinate system other than the dq-axis. In the healthy state and single-phase open fault state, the equation is verified through experiments and simulations, and the control stability according to the coordinate transformation is compared.

[1]  Yan Yan,et al.  Current Harmonic Suppression for Dual Three-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives , 2019, IEEE Access.

[2]  Jimi Tjong,et al.  Open-Phase Fault Modeling and Optimized Fault-Tolerant Control of Dual Three-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[3]  Shoudao Huang,et al.  Six-Phase Space Vector PWM under Stator One-Phase Open-Circuit Fault Condition , 2018, Energies.

[4]  Yang Guijie,et al.  Control strategy for dual three-phase PMSM based on reduced order mathematical model under fault condition due to open phases , 2018 .

[5]  Dong Ting,et al.  Fault-tolerant method for six-phase PMSM by adjusting phase angle , 2017, 2017 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS).

[6]  Yuan Xu,et al.  Control of Dual Three-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor under Open Phase Fault Conditions , 2016, 2016 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC).

[7]  Z. Q. Zhu,et al.  Comparison of two-individual current control and vector space decomposition control for dual three-phase PMSM , 2016, 2016 XXII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM).

[8]  Ogbonnaya Okoro,et al.  Transient Analysis and Modelling of Sixphase Asynchronous Machine , 2015 .

[9]  Fan Wu,et al.  Six-phase fault-tolerant permanent magnet motor drives with reduced switch counts: Topology comparisons and hardware demonstration , 2015, 2015 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC).

[10]  Masoud Karimi-Ghartemani,et al.  A resonant controller with robust features for digital implementations at low sampling frequency , 2012, IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[11]  P. Silventoinen,et al.  Dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous machine supplied by two independent voltage source inverters , 2012, International Symposium on Power Electronics Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion.

[12]  R. Arnold,et al.  Modelling and field orientated current control of a two-star 6-phase IPMSM for gearless wheel drives , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC).

[13]  T.J.E. Miller,et al.  Analysis of multi-phase permanent-magnet synchronous machines , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems.

[14]  Emil Levi,et al.  Multiphase Electric Machines for Variable-Speed Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  M. Liserre,et al.  Multiple harmonics control for three-phase grid converter systems with the use of PI-RES current controller in a rotating frame , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[16]  H. Knudsen,et al.  Extended Park's transformation for 2/spl times/3-phase synchronous machine and converter phasor model with representation of AC harmonics , 1995 .

[17]  Y. Zhao,et al.  Space vector PWM control of dual three phase induction machine using vector space decomposition , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[18]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Disturbance free operation of a multiphase current regulated motor drive with an opened phase , 1993, Conference Record of the 1993 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Twenty-Eighth IAS Annual Meeting.

[19]  V.T. Ranganathan,et al.  Split phase induction motor operation from PWM voltage source inverter , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[20]  H. Knudsen Extended Park's transformation for 2×3-phase synchronous machine and converter phasor model with representation of AC harmonics , 2018 .

[21]  Emil Levi,et al.  Advances in Converter Control and Innovative Exploitation of Additional Degrees of Freedom for Multiphase Machines , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  L. Parsa,et al.  On advantages of multi-phase machines , 2005, 31st Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2005. IECON 2005..

[23]  Seung-Ki Sul,et al.  Synchronous frame current control of multi-phase synchronous motor - part II asymmetric fault condition due to open phases , 2004, Conference Record of the 2004 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, 2004. 39th IAS Annual Meeting..