Current situation of Panitumumab, Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab

EGFR overexpression usually correlates with a more advanced disease stage, a poorer prognosis and a worse chemotherapy response. EGFR expression increase has been observed in many tumours. For all the aforementioned reasons, EGFR inhibition can be considered an attractive approach in cancer treatment. One strategy has been receptor inhibition of extracellular domain using monoclonal antibodies. Cetuximab is the most developped one and there is plenty information on the literature about its current status. In this review we focus on other EGFR monoclonal antibodies under clinical development. The more developed one is Panitumumab. Its clinical development is taking place very quickly and it has mainly been studied in colorectal cancer showing pomising results. There are also other interesting drugs such as Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab.

[1]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  An open-label, single-arm study assessing safety and efficacy of panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  P. Harari,et al.  Biology of interactions: antiepidermal growth factor receptor agents. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Berlin,et al.  Panitumumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[4]  S. Bellone,et al.  Overexpression of epidermal growth factor type-1 receptor (EGF-R1) in cervical cancer: implications for Cetuximab-mediated therapy in recurrent/metastatic disease. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  M. Moroni,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and clinical outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Socinski Antibodies to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status of Matuzumab and Panitumumab , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  D. Rimm,et al.  Quantitative measurement of epidermal growth factor receptor is a negative predictive factor for tamoxifen response in hormone receptor positive premenopausal breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Singal,et al.  EGFR targeting of solid tumors. , 2007, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[9]  P. Jänne,et al.  EGFR, HER2 and Kras as predictive factors for cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer , 2007 .

[10]  M. K. Pal,et al.  Feasibility of combining humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody h-R3 (nimotuzumab) with chemotherapy-A study of toxicity profile and tolerance , 2007 .

[11]  E. Mitchell,et al.  Institutional experiences with panitumumab monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) intolerant to cetuximab , 2007 .

[12]  C. Verslype,et al.  KRAS mutations preclude tumor shrinkage of colorectal cancers treated with cetuximab , 2007 .

[13]  J. Berlin,et al.  Safety of panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) across clinical trials , 2007 .

[14]  J. Hecht,et al.  Panitumumab activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) with low or negative tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) levels: An updated analysis , 2007 .

[15]  H. Hurwitz,et al.  Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 706 with panitumumab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX for the treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) , 2007 .

[16]  J. Berlin,et al.  Predictive value of skin toxicity severity for response to panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A pooled analysis of five clinical trials , 2007 .

[17]  F. Lordick,et al.  Cetuximab plus weekly oxaliplatin/5FU/FA (FUFOX) in 1st line metastatic gastric cancer. Final results from a multicenter phase II study of the AIO upper GI study group , 2007 .

[18]  R. Tishler,et al.  Phase I study of panitumumab, chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC): Early results , 2007 .

[19]  U. Bode,et al.  Final report of a phase II trial of nimotuzumab in the treatment of refractory and relapsed high-grade gliomas in children and adolescents , 2007 .

[20]  G. Pond,et al.  A single agent, phase I pharmacodynamic study of nimotuzumab (TheraCIM-h-R3) in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors , 2007 .

[21]  B. Burtness Her signaling in pancreatic cancer , 2007, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[22]  Li Zhang,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III status defines clinically distinct subtypes of glioblastoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Marc Peeters,et al.  Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Lee M Ellis,et al.  Targeted therapy trials: approval strategies, target validation, or helping patients? , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  K. Holen,et al.  Treatment with panitumumab after a severe infusion reaction to cetuximab in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report. , 2007, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[27]  P. Keegan,et al.  FDA drug approval summary: panitumumab (Vectibix). , 2007, The oncologist.

[28]  H. Burris,et al.  A phase II trial of EMD72000 (matuzumab), a humanized anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal malignancies. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[29]  C. Magi-Galluzzi,et al.  The prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a call for standardized methods for immunohistochemical evaluation. , 2007, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[30]  Felix Y. Feng,et al.  Integration of EGFR inhibitors with radiochemotherapy , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[31]  J. Bernier,et al.  Cetuximab in the treatment of head and neck cancer , 2006, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[32]  C. Fenoglio-Preiser,et al.  Phase II trial of erlotinib in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinomas: SWOG 0127. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  J. Hecht,et al.  Panitumumab in colon cancer: a review and summary of ongoing trials , 2006, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[34]  Christine H Chung,et al.  Increased epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  R. Herbst,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Development for the Treatment of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[36]  R. Lilenbaum The Evolving Role of Cetuximab in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[37]  G. Gladish,et al.  Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 706, panitumumab, and carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) for the treatment of patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  P. Parren,et al.  Impact of antibody Fc carbohydrate fucosylation on antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity by HuMax-EGFr -A fully human epidermal growth factor receptor antibody. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  A phase I study of the humanized monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody EMD 72000 (matuzumab) in combination with paclitaxel in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[40]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[41]  F. Rojo,et al.  Phase I study of the humanised anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody matuzumab (EMD 72000) combined with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[42]  A. Lage,et al.  Treatment of high-grade glioma patients with the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody h-R3: Report from a phase I/II trial , 2006, Cancer biology & therapy.

[43]  J. McCune,et al.  Current Status of Cetuximab for the Treatment of Patients with Solid Tumors , 2006, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[44]  J. Bartlett,et al.  The Role of HER1-HER4 and EGFRvIII in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[45]  David G P Allan Nimotuzumab: evidence of clinical benefit without rash. , 2005, The oncologist.

[46]  J. Raizer HER1/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme , 2005, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[47]  A. D. Dei Tos,et al.  Assessing epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumours: what is the value of current test methods? , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[48]  W. M. Smit,et al.  Phase II study to determine response rate, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of treatment with the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody EMD 72000 (matuzumab) in patients with recurrent cervical cancer , 2005 .

[49]  R. Figlin,et al.  Updated results from a dose and schedule study of Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) monotherapy, in patients with advanced solid malignancies , 2005 .

[50]  Silvia Benvenuti,et al.  Gene copy number for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and clinical response to antiEGFR treatment in colorectal cancer: a cohort study. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[51]  H. Sorbye,et al.  Targeted drugs in metastatic colorectal cancer with special emphasis on guidelines for the use of bevacizumab and cetuximab: An Acta Oncologica expert report , 2005, Acta oncologica.

[52]  J. Spicer Technology evaluation: nimotuzumab, the Center of Molecular Immunology/YM BioSciences/Oncoscience. , 2005, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[53]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  R. Hitt,et al.  Prognostic value of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGRF) and p53 in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with induction chemotherapy. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[55]  M. Younes Is immunohistochemistry for epidermal growth factor receptor expression a poor predictor of response to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[56]  R. Berardi,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status in primary colorectal tumors does not correlate with EGFR expression in related metastatic sites: implications for treatment with EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[57]  Richard L Schilsky,et al.  Cetuximab in the treatment of colorectal cancer. , 2004, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[58]  R. Figlin,et al.  Safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of ABX-EGF, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[60]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Activity of cetuximab in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to both irinotecan and oxaliplatin. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[61]  S. Störkel,et al.  Immunohistochemical Detection of EGFR in Paraffin-embedded Tumor Tissues , 2004, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[62]  J. Koropatnick,et al.  Use of the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody h-R3 in combination with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[63]  P. Harari,et al.  Searching for Reliable Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Response Predictors , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[64]  A. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Radiosensitization by Pan ErbB Inhibitor CI-1033 in Vitro and in Vivo , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[65]  J. Baselga,et al.  Phase I study of the humanized antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody EMD72000 in patients with advanced solid tumors that express the epidermal growth factor receptor. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[66]  M. Solano,et al.  Pharmacological Evaluation of Humanized Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, Monoclonal Antibody h-R3, in Patients With Advanced Epithelial-Derived Cancer , 2003, Journal of immunotherapy.

[67]  C. Arteaga The epidermal growth factor receptor: from mutant oncogene in nonhuman cancers to therapeutic target in human neoplasia. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[68]  J. Baselga,et al.  Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor: a clinical reality. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[69]  N. Goldstein,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemical reactivity in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV colon adenocarcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[70]  A. Hölscher,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2-neu mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer Is correlated with survival. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[71]  D. Robinson,et al.  The protein tyrosine kinase family of the human genome , 2000, Oncogene.

[72]  C. Davis,et al.  Eradication of established tumors by a fully human monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor without concomitant chemotherapy. , 1999, Cancer research.

[73]  F Demard,et al.  Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and survival in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[74]  A. Ullrich,et al.  High-affinity epidermal growth factor binding is specifically reduced by a monoclonal antibody, and appears necessary for early responses , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[75]  T. Hunter,et al.  Signal transduction by epidermal growth factor occurs through the subclass of high affinity receptors , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.