Blocking but not conditioned inhibition results when an added stimulus is reinforced in compound with multiple pretrained stimuli.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Kamin. Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .
[2] R. Rescorla. Pavlovian conditioned inhibition , 1969 .
[3] R. Rescorla. Reduction in the effectiveness of reinforcement after prior excitatory conditioning , 1970 .
[4] N. Mackintosh,et al. Blocking as a Function of Novelty of CS and Predictability of UCS , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[5] R. Rescorla. Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[6] A. R. Wagner,et al. CS habituation produces a “latent inhibition effect” but no active “conditioned inhibition” , 1972 .
[7] R. Rescorla,et al. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .
[8] N. Mackintosh,et al. Complete suppression to a compound CS does not block further conditioning to each element. , 1974 .
[9] N. Mackintosh. A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .
[10] E. Kremer. The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[11] J. Pearce,et al. Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[12] Ralph R. Miller,et al. Blocking as a Retrieval Failure: Reactivation of Associations to a Blocked Stimulus , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.
[13] E. Damianopoulos. Necessary and sufficient factors in classical conditioning , 1982, The Pavlovian journal of biological science.