Employment Nondiscrimination Acts and Corporate Innovation

We show that U.S. state-level Employment Non-Discrimination Acts (ENDAs) — laws that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity — spur innovation. We find a significant increase in patents and patent citations for firms headquartered in states that have passed ENDAs relative to firms headquartered in states that have not. This result is more pronounced for firms that previously have not implemented pro-gay non-discrimination policies, for firms in states with a large homosexual population, and for firms in human capital-intensive industries. Lastly, we provide evidence suggesting that ENDAs affect innovation by matching pro-gay employees, who are generally more creative than anti-gay employees, with innovative firms.

[1]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Innovation and Institutional Ownership , 2013 .

[2]  Xuan Tian,et al.  Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?: Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? , 2014 .

[3]  Ramin P. Baghai,et al.  Wrongful Discharge Laws and Innovation , 2012 .

[4]  Vivian W. Fang,et al.  Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? , 2013 .

[5]  S. McLaren,et al.  Sense of Belonging and Depressive Symptoms Among GLB Adolescents , 2010, Journal of homosexuality.

[6]  Gustavo Manso,et al.  Is Pay-for-Performance Detrimental to Innovation? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[7]  G. Gates.  Same-Sex Couples and the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual Population: New Estimates from the American Community Survey , 2006 .

[8]  G. Gates.  The Impact of Sexual Orientation Anti-discrimination Policies on the Wages of Lesbians and Gay Men , 2009 .

[9]  G. Herek.  Assessing heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. , 1994 .

[10]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship , 2005 .

[11]  Alexander Ljungqvist,et al.  As Certain as Debt and Taxes: Estimating the Tax Sensitivity of Leverage from Exogenous State Tax Changes , 2012 .

[12]  Gustavo Manso.  Motivating Innovation , 2010 .

[13]  R. Bénabou,et al.  Religion and Innovation , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  S. Kanazawa.  INTELLIGENCE AND HOMOSEXUALITY , 2012, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[15]  Alexander Ljungqvist,et al.  As Certain as Debt and Taxes: Estimating the Tax Sensitivity of Leverage from State Tax Changes , 2014 .

[16]  Julian Atanassov.  Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting , 2012 .

[17]  G. Gates,et al.  How Many People are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender? , 2011 .

[18]  Donald R. McCreary,et al.  Differential Reactions to Men and Women's Gender Role Transgressions: Perceptions of Social Status, Sexual Orientation, and Value Dissimilarity , 2004 .

[19]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  AGENCY COSTS AND INNOVATION , 1989 .

[20]  Gregory B. Lewis,et al.  Changing Public Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage: The Case of California , 2008 .

[21]  K. Weston.  Get Thee to a Big City: Sexual Imaginary and the Great Gay Migration , 1995 .

[22]  V. B. Flatt,et al.  The effects of state and local antidiscrimination policies on earnings for gays and lesbians , 1998 .

[23]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Use and Misuse of Patent Data: Issues for Corporate Finance and Beyond , 2017 .

[24]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[25]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Innovation and Institutional Ownership , 2009 .

[26]  C. Raddatz.  Liquidity Needs and Vulnerability to Financial Underdevelopment , 2003 .

[27]  Frederic L. Pryor,et al.  On the geography of hate , 1999 .

[28]  Lowell J. Taylor,et al.  Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources , 2011, Demography.

[29]  Open-Mindedness and Creativity , 1967, Psychological reports.

[30]  Michael J. Rosenfeld,et al.  The Independence of Young Adults and the Rise of Interracial and Same-Sex Unions , 2005 .

[31]  Xuan Tian,et al.  The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: The Case of Innovation , 2013 .

[32]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[33]  Z. Griliches.  Market Value, R&D, and Patents , 1981 .

[34]  Julian Atanassov.  Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting: Takeovers and Innovation , 2013 .

[35]  M. Badgett,et al.  Bias in the Workplace: Consistent Evidence of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination 1998–2008 , 2007 .

[36]  J. Barth,et al.  Are Gay Men and Lesbians in the South the New “Threat”?: Regional Comparisons of the Contact Theory , 2003 .

[37]  R. Coff,et al.  Human Capital, Shared Expertise, and the Likelihood of Impasse in Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[38]  W. Rubenstein.  Do Gay Rights Laws Matter?: An Empirical Assessment , 2002 .

[39]  Toni M. Whited,et al.  Endogeneity in Empirical Corporate Finance1 , 2013 .

[40]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry , 2005 .

[41]  A. Gorman‐Murray.  Reconfiguring Domestic Values: Meanings of Home for Gay Men and Lesbians , 2007 .

[42]  R. Florida.  Cities and the Creative Class , 2003 .

[43]  C. Suárez-Orozco,et al.  Migrating to Opportunities: How Family Migration Motivations Shape Academic Trajectories among Newcomer Immigrant Youth , 2010 .

[44]  Michael E. Martell.  How ENDAs Extend the Workweek: Legal Protection and the Labor Supply of Behaviorally Gay Men , 2014 .

[45]  K. Meier,et al.  Legislative Victory, Electoral Uncertainty: Explaining Outcomes in the Battles over Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights , 2003 .

[46]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[47]  Stijn Claessens,et al.  Financial Development, Property Rights and Growth , 2002 .