Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a trend towards a decrease in irradiance without loss of efficacy for a better tolerability

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). The conventional approved PDT protocol in Europe (C-PDT) involves red-light photoactivation at irradiances higher than 60 mW/cm2 , making the treatment painful. Several clinical studies have reported similar efficacy and better tolerability when using red-light photoactivation at lower irradiances. The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is a minimum irradiance threshold for red-light photoactivation above which there is no further improvement in efficacy. A photodiode sensor connected to a power meter was used to measure the irradiance delivered to 114 AKs on the scalp and forehead of 19 patients during C-PDT using the Aktilite CL 128 (Galderma SA, Switzerland). The widely ranging measured irradiances, resulting from the heterogeneous photoactivation over the treatment area provided by the Aktilite CL 128, were cross-referenced with the clinically evaluated complete responses (CR) at 3 months. The 66 AKs in CR at 3 months received an average irradiance of 30.9 mW/cm2 (standard deviation: 16.7 mW/cm2 ) compared to 33.3 mW/cm2 (standard deviation: 17.9 mW/cm2 ) for the 48 AKs in incomplete response. No significant effect of the irradiance on the CR at 3 months was found (odds ratio for a 6 mW/cm2 -unit change, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.10; p=0.53). No minimum irradiance threshold could therefore be determined in the considered irradiance range. A red-light device enabling homogeneous irradiation at a lower irradiance than the Aktilite CL 128 may therefore provide similar efficacy and higher treatment tolerability than C-PDT.

[1]  H. Moseley Light distribution and calibration of commercial PDT LED arrays , 2005, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[2]  A. Sidoroff,et al.  European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy , 2015, European Journal of Dermatology.

[3]  S. R. Wiegell Update on photodynamic treatment for actinic keratosis. , 2015, Current problems in dermatology.

[4]  H. Wulf,et al.  Continuous activation of PpIX by daylight is as effective as and less painful than conventional photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses; a randomized, controlled, single‐blinded study , 2008, The British journal of dermatology.

[5]  A. Enk,et al.  Low irradiance compared with conventional photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratoses , 2018, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.

[6]  C. Berking,et al.  Topical Methyl Aminolevulinate Photodynamic Therapy Using Red Light‐Emitting Diode Light for Multiple Actinic Keratoses: A Randomized Study , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[7]  D. Ioannides,et al.  The impact of different fluence rates on pain and clinical outcome in patients with actinic keratoses treated with photodynamic therapy , 2011, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.

[8]  J. Lang Pain during photodynamic therapy is associated with protoporphyrin IX fluorescence and fluence rate , 2009 .

[9]  R. Geronemus,et al.  Topical methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy using red light-emitting diode light for treatment of multiple actinic keratoses: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[10]  S. Mordon,et al.  The conventional protocol vs. a protocol including illumination with a fabric‐based biophotonic device (the Phosistos protocol) in photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical study , 2019, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  S. Mordon,et al.  Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the forehead and scalp with the Aktilite CL 128: Is there a cut‐off value for PpIX‐weighted irradiance for effective treatment? , 2019, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.