Friendship networks and social status

In empirical studies of friendship networks, participants are typically asked, in interviews or questionnaires, to identify some or all of their close friends, resulting in a directed network in which friendships can, and often do, run in only one direction between a pair of individuals. Here we analyze a large collection of such networks representing friendships among students at US high and junior-high schools and show that the pattern of unreciprocated friendships is far from random. In every network, without exception, we find that there exists a ranking of participants, from low to high, such that almost all unreciprocated friendships consist of a lower ranked individual claiming friendship with a higher ranked one. We present a maximum-likelihood method for deducing such rankings from observed network data and conjecture that the rankings produced reflect a measure of social status. We note in particular that reciprocated and unreciprocated friendships obey different statistics, suggesting different formation processes, and that rankings are correlated with other characteristics of the participants that are traditionally associated with status, such as age and overall popularity as measured by total number of friends.

[1]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Symmetric-Acyclic Decompositions of Networks , 2000, J. Classif..

[2]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[3]  M. Hallinan,et al.  The Effects of Individual and Structural Characteristics on Intransitivity in Social Networks , 1988 .

[4]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[5]  S. Leinhardt,et al.  The Structure of Positive Interpersonal Relations in Small Groups. , 1967 .

[6]  Raymond T. Stefani,et al.  Survey of the major world sports rating systems , 1997 .

[7]  D. J. Strauss,et al.  Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks , 1990 .

[8]  C. Drews THE CONCEPT AND DEFINITION OF DOMINANCE IN ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR , 1993 .

[9]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Edoardo M. Airoldi,et al.  A Survey of Statistical Network Models , 2009, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[11]  T. Snijders Statistical Models for Social Networks , 2011 .

[12]  D. Offer,et al.  The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and Its Impact on Education. , 1962 .

[13]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  The Bowl Championship Series: A Mathematical Review , 2004, physics/0403049.

[14]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  P. Holland,et al.  An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs , 1981 .

[16]  A RAPOPORT,et al.  A study of a large sociogram. , 2007 .

[17]  Edoardo M. Airoldi,et al.  Confidence sets for network structure , 2011, NIPS.

[18]  Yuchung J. Wang,et al.  Stochastic Blockmodels for Directed Graphs , 1987 .

[19]  René Veenstra,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory and Its Limits: Why Adolescents Hang Out With Popular Peers , 2010 .

[20]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[21]  M. Hallinan,et al.  A Stochastic Model for Change in Group Structure , 1976 .

[22]  Gerhard Reinelt,et al.  The linear ordering problem: algorithms and applications , 1985 .

[23]  W. Cook,et al.  On the Minimum Violations Ranking of a Tournament , 1986 .

[24]  De,et al.  Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review. , 1998, Animal behaviour.